Smaller Trucks, Bigger Loyalty: VW Sees a Place for Truly Compact Pickups

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Volkswagen has been flagrantly displaying new pickups at trade shows for a couple of years now, and with good reason. Domestic trucks have grown very large. In 1993, you could still purchase the Ford F-Series in a format where its maximum length did not exceed 197 inches. Today, the F-150 gets no smaller than 209 inches with a standard cab. Meanwhile, the now mid-sized Ranger, sold only in SuperCab and SuperCrew guise, grew from to 181 inches in overall length to a whopping 211 inches within the same timeframe.

The supersizing of the North American pickup created an interesting opportunity for manufacturers, and Volkswagen took notice.

“As [midsize] pickups get bigger — to the stage where they are as big as full-size pickups were not so long ago – and more expensive and less fuel-efficient, we are trying to see if there is space for a vehicle with a smaller footprint that potentially is more affordable and gets better gas mileage,” VW’s senior vice president for product marketing, Hein Schafer, explained to The Detroit News this week.

Despite the continued existence of the overseas Amarok, Volkswagen has shown two new pickups at American trade shows over the last two years. In 2018, the Atlas-based Tanoak concept showed up at the New York Auto Show to show the automaker was serious about exploring the truck market. That concept, however, was sized extremely close to existing mid-size mainstays and was actually a little larger than Ford’s Ranger.

The following year, the much smaller (at 193.5 inches) Tarok arrived. Assuming Volkswagen sells it in the United States, the pickup would be the smallest thing with a bed currently available. It’s also more congruous with the public presumption that VW does small vehicles well. That’s unlikely to be disputed by early adopters, who will notice that the Tarok’s modern, car-like interior is loaded with the latest technologies.

It’s also the better vehicle to break into the truck market with, according to Autotrader senior auto analyst Michelle Krebs. “Our research shows there is little brand loyalty in smaller trucks,” she said. “Full-size buyers are the most loyal in the industry; smaller-truck buyers are the least. So the newest player likely has a good chance of conquesting [sic] buyers.”

A small truck would also have more global appeal. While individuals with a penchant for oversized ladder-frame pickups exist across the globe, most places aren’t interested in importing what would likely be considered an extravagant and ridiculously proportioned work vehicle. Something smaller is likely the better fit, which is why Volkswagen has already started assembly of the Tarok in Brazil. The automaker would need to shift production to North America to avoid the dreaded chicken tax.

To accomplish this, VW claims it can probably move some assembly north (likely to Mexico, alongside its MQB-based relatives) without much trouble. There, the little pickup would receive a more robust powerplant than the 1.4-liter TSI four-cylinder offered to Brazilian buyers.

“Obviously there is a market here for small pickups for young people who don’t want to spend $40,000 and want a lifestyle vehicle to haul their bikes or kayak,” says Joe Phillippi, analyst at AutoTrends Consulting. “But it’s a finite number of sales and manufacturers need to make sense of the numbers.”

Phillippi estimates that the hypothetical U.S.-spec Tarok would start in the low $20,000 range and fall short of $30,000 when fully loaded. That’s considerable different ground than a typical American full-size pickup, which usually starts above $25,000 and can be kitted out to a point where it costs multiple times the base model’s MSRP.

If Volkswagen is serious about getting back into the pickup game, it’ll have to strike while the iron is hot, at the same time realizing that this likely won’t be a segment with a never-ending consumer base. VW has the first aspect covered and may find additional support through its current partnership with Ford. But the second could be upended if a gaggle of rival manufacturer decide to start delivering smaller lifestyle trucks to Americans.

[Images: Volkswagen]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 42 comments
  • Namstrap Namstrap on Jun 05, 2019

    Last time I was in the UK, I saw lots of what I thought were smaller Japanese pickups. They were sized kind of like the ones from the 90s and 2000s. On closer inspection, they were labelled "Great Wall", so the Chinese are filling that need over there.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Jun 06, 2019

    That doesn't surprise me, there is a need for a smaller truck.

  • 3-On-The-Tree Besides for the sake of emissions I don’t understand why the OEM’s went with small displacement twin turbo engines in heavy trucks. Like you guys stated above there really isn’t a MPG advantage. Plus that engine is under stress pulling that truck around then you hit it with turbos, more rpm’s , air, fuel, heat. My F-150 Ecoboost 3.5 went through one turbo replacement and the other was leaking. l’ll stick with my 2021 V8 Tundra.
  • Syke What I'll never understand about economics reporting: $1.1 billion net income is a mark of failure? Anyone with half a brain recognizes that Tesla is slowly settling in to becoming just another EV manufacturer, now that the legacy manufacturers have gained a sense of reality and quit tripping over their own feet in converting their product lines. Who is stupid enough to believe that Tesla is going to remain 90% of the EV market for the next ten years?Or is it just cheap headlines to highlight another Tesla "problem"?
  • Rna65689660 I had an AMG G-Wagon roar past me at night doing 90 - 100. What a glorious sound. This won’t get the same vibe.
  • Marc Muskrat only said what he needed to say to make the stock pop. These aren't the droids you're looking for. Move along.
  • SCE to AUX I never believed they cancelled it. That idea was promoted by people who concluded that the stupid robotaxi idea was a replacement for the cheaper car; Tesla never said that.
Next