QOTD: A Massacre of Marques?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

On the way to meet a longtime friend for dinner last night, your author stopped off to gawk at old cars at a local cruise night event — a common occurrence when the snow isn’t flying.

Thank God for retirees with plenty of resources and lots of free time. I fear what will happen to these rides after the old guys lose their license. And, because this is TTAC and not one of those other sites, you’re not about to hear a bitter, angsty screed about Boomers and their undeserved money and opportunity, etc, etc.

Anyhow, one beauty beckoned to me from across the lot. A 1955 sedan with a badge that should prove unfamiliar to American readers urged me to take a closer look, prompting a bit of rumination about modern-day choices.

It was a Monarch. Specifically, a Monarch Lucerne — a mid-range trim of a mid-priced marque, positioned above the Custom but below the tony Richelieu. Monarch, to those unfamiliar with the brand, was a Canadian marque created just after World War 2 by Ford of Canada. Tempting buyers until 1957, and then again from 1959 to 1961 (following the Edsel disaster) the Monarch brand used Mercury as its basis, with Ford’s Canadian arm putting a special stamp on what were essentially Montereys and Montclairs.

This non-Buick Lucerne, the proud owner told me, was built in Windsor, Ontario and carried Ford’s two-speed Ford-O-Matic tranny, plus the automaker’s 292 V8.

The Meteor brand followed the same recipe north of the border, only with Ford cars — eventually moving to Mercurys after Monarch bit the dust. At the time, Canadians could buy Fords and Mercurys as well as Monarchs and Meteors. The Frontenac marque, comprised of a single vehicle (a rebadged Ford Falcon) existed for one year: 1960. Canuck General Motors fans in the 1960s could hop into an Acadian-badged model that was actually a Chevy but looked like a Pontiac.

Wild times.

We currently find ourselves in a time of contraction. The last couple of decades has seen the elimination of the Oldsmobile, Plymouth, Saturn, Hummer, Pontiac, Mercury, and Scion divisions of their respective parent automakers. Before that, it was Geo and Asuna, Imperial and DeSoto. Consolidation and reduced build configurations are the name of the game these days. Reduced choice, as prescribed by OEM beancounters. Sub-brands, on the other hands, are proliferating, with Mercedes-Benz’s EQ, Hyundai’s N, and Buick’s Avenir being just the latest examples of the trend.

While new automakers will inevitable join the landscape, adding new marques to shopping lists, it seems the head count of bonafide brands under existing automakers has long since reached its high-water mark.

Do you see any established automaker, domestic or foreign, adding a new marque under their corporate umbrella in the near future? Keep in mind we’re talking about brands offered here.

[Images: Steph Willems/TTAC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 62 comments
  • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on Jun 14, 2019

    Given how much America is all about consuming itself with remakes and reboots, I don't see a new as in "created from scratch" brand emerging unless it's a Tesla type ego/niche product. I could see the resurrection of an old brand though if it seemed like a good way to target a particular market segment. Edsel notwithstanding, I think most domestic brand names have at worst neutral and at best positive feeling with the public at large. Another exception may be Hummer due to its polarization, but the kind of people who liked to post pictures of them giving Hummer drivers the finger were never going to buy one and those that owned them seem to have near Jeep-like perceptions so the negativity there might be a net plus. I also don't forsee "AMC" being resurrected any time soon. Yes, AMC did a lot with a little and those in the know respect that, but the public at large sees AMC as the Pacer and the Gremlin, not the AMX and Javelin. Bringing back Rambler or Hudson might be a little more likely -- especially as the kids who grew up with Doc Hudson from the Pixar "Cars" franchise become old enough to drive. Sidebar: How would that be for a tie-in with a hypothetical Cars 5? A new 2022 Hudson Hornet from FCA! Depending on how the market evolves I could see VW or Nissan bringing in a brand to slot underneath (eg, Skoda or Datsun) to try to push the mainline brand upmarket a bit.

  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Jun 14, 2019

    Does anyone remember Duesenberg? It was resurrected several times. Then Avanti - also was resurrected, I even saw one on parking lot at work. DeLorean - you can buy one right now. Tacker - we have one in local museum.

  • Formula m For the gas versions I like the Honda CRV. Haven’t driven the hybrids yet.
  • SCE to AUX All that lift makes for an easy rollover of your $70k truck.
  • SCE to AUX My son cross-shopped the RAV4 and Model Y, then bought the Y. To their surprise, they hated the RAV4.
  • SCE to AUX I'm already driving the cheap EV (19 Ioniq EV).$30k MSRP in late 2018, $23k after subsidy at lease (no tax hassle)$549/year insurance$40 in electricity to drive 1000 miles/month66k miles, no range lossAffordable 16" tiresVirtually no maintenance expensesHyundai (for example) has dramatically cut prices on their EVs, so you can get a 361-mile Ioniq 6 in the high 30s right now.But ask me if I'd go to the Subaru brand if one was affordable, and the answer is no.
  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
Next