Fiat Chrysler Loses the Urge to Merge, Withdraws Proposal to Renault

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Following a whirlwind 10-day courtship, Fiat Chrysler withdrew its marriage proposal to Groupe Renault on Wednesday night, citing irreconcilable differences.

FCA blames France.

The proposed 50:50 merger with the French automaker, floated on Memorial Day, was snatched off the table following an FCA board meeting, the automaker stated in a release, adding that it had “become clear that the political conditions in France do not currently exist for such a combination to proceed successfully.”

Renault’s board was expected to make a decision on Tuesday as to whether to reject the proposal or move into merger talks. That decision was postponed after the French government, which holds a 15 percent stake in Renault — and would see its influence shrink by half in a merger — pressured Renault to delay.

Last week, France reportedly asked FCA for certain assurances to earn its approval, including guarantees of a Paris headquarters for the new entity, the retention of all French workers for a four-year span, and a seat at the boardroom table. These guarantees, cited by sources close to the negotiations, were not confirmed.

FCA believed the new entity emerging from the union would enjoy numerous benefits with regard to platform and technology sharing, with both sides standing to save a combined $5.6 billion through shared development costs and purchasing. FCA Chairman John Elkann even offered a hand to Renault’s nervous alliance partners, Nissan and Mitsubishi.

Besides blaming France, the American automaker’s public statement contains a whiff of “you’ll miss us when we’re gone”-style hard bargaining tactics.

“FCA remains firmly convinced of the compelling, transformational rationale of a proposal that has been widely appreciated since it was submitted, the structure and terms of which were carefully balanced to deliver substantial benefits to all parties,” the company said.

In a statement issued Thursday morning, Groupe Renault expressed its “disappointment not to have the opportunity to continue to pursue the proposal,” calling the offer “timely” and “compelling.”

According to media reports, Nissan said it would not vote on the proposed merger, leaving the French government — which hoped to keep the existing alliance intact (and happy) — with cold feet. A struggling Nissan, like France, would see its influence watered down in such a merger. Reuters reports French finance minister Bruno Le Maire said his government would not approve a merger without the endorsement of Nissan.

However, a source close to FCA claims the Nissan angle is a cover, suggesting French President Emmanuel Macron was seeking a way out of the deal after facing blowback from citizens.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • Rpol35 Rpol35 on Jun 06, 2019

    BTW, love the image..."watch my taillights fade....."

  • Stingray65 Stingray65 on Jun 06, 2019

    Now we will never know the joy of owning a car with the styling the French are known for, the reliability that Italians are known for, the ride and handling that the Japanese are known for, and the brand killing rebates and money on the hood that the Americans are known for. It could have been a marriage made in heaven.

  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
  • Dave Holzman '08 Civic (stick) that I bought used 1/31/12 with 35k on the clock. Now at 159k.It runs as nicely as it did when I bought it. I love the feel of the car. The most expensive replacement was the AC compressor, I think, but something to do with the AC that went at 80k and cost $1300 to replace. It's had more stuff replaced than I expected, but not enough to make me want to ditch a car that I truly enjoy driving.
  • ToolGuy Let's review: I am a poor unsuccessful loser. Any car company which introduced an EV which I could afford would earn my contempt. Of course I would buy it, but I wouldn't respect them. 😉
  • ToolGuy Correct answer is the one that isn't a Honda.
  • 1995 SC Man it isn't even the weekend yet
Next