FCA Chairman: Make No Mistake - We're Still on the Prowl
Thursday night’s falling apart of the proposed Fiat Chrysler-Renault merger was a setback for FCA, but the automaker wants everyone to know it remains on the hunt for a willing partner. Essentially, nothing’s changed from the days when former CEO Sergio Marchionne made eyes at the likes of General Motors and Volkswagen, only to receive the cold shoulder.
Sure, it didn’t work out with the French, Chairman John Elkann wrote to FCA employees, but that doesn’t mean FCA won’t soon find a date for the dance.
The letter, obtained by Reuters, sees Elkann claiming the company withdrew its proposal to Renault to protect FCA employees and stakeholders, adding it took the discussions “as far as they can reasonably go.”
“The decision to engage in these discussions with Groupe Renault was the right one and one we took after much preparation on many fronts,” the Agnelli family scion wrote.
Neither side in the abortive merger has said much about what specific issue or issues caused the talks to fall apart, but FCA’s comment about “political conditions in France” lends credence to rumors of hefty guarantees demanded by the French government. Those included a French headquarters for the combined entity, assurances for French workers, and a special dividend for Renault shareholders. Allegedly, the French government also wanted a representative on the board.
Not deterred by the experience, FCA remains on the hunt for someone to share platforms and development costs with.
“FCA, under Mike Manley’s leadership, is an outstanding business … with a clear strategy for a strong, independent future,” Elkann wrote. “We will continue to be open to opportunities of all kinds that offer the possibility to enhance and accelerate the delivery of that strategy and the creation of value.”
One future possibility is a strengthened partnership with France’s PSA Group, which was the subject of numerous rumors earlier this year.
[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]
More by Steph Willems
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- THX1136 Well, at least these won't cost over $210K like the Revology Mustangs.
- Daniel People are just going to believe what they *want* to believe to fit their narrative. Yes, those who drive more than 200 miles on a regular basis shouldn't get an EV as their main vehicle for now, but for around town and commuting they work great. Go with a lease for now to try one out, trickle charge at home and use the PlugShare app to find public chargers, many of which are free. And that's for those well-off, for those lower middle class, there are tons of rebates for the car AND having level 2 charger installed at home. I am a full-on auto enthusiast for over 35 years since an early teen and I have already been through the death of affordable sporty cars and the manual transmission. So I made sure to test drive them first, was very happy with the power, surprisingly good handling, and the paddle shifters for regen levels are nearly identical to me using the paddle shifters to engine brake in my last ICE car. I'll always love the great ICE vehicles too, but I'm actually saving money driving an even faster EV than my last car with free charging and relatively low electric rates in my area.
- HotRod The Tunnel Turn at the "Tricky Triangle" (Pocono Raceway). I got to push a Nascar-style Dodge Intrepid harder than I ever imagined. I was miserable with shingles at the time, making the experience that much more memorable. But for a handful of laps I didn't feel anything but pure adrenaline.
- Redapple2 That is one busy face. Ford: Too much.
- SCE to AUX The video in the link is pretty damning, but the fix should be a simple mechanical repair. A code patch won't do it.
Comments
Join the conversation
I've always felt the VW Group would be a perfect fit for FCA, and would provide VW with everything they are lacking, especially in the US - light/heavy duty trucks from RAM, rugged off-road vehicles from Jeep, and a minivan platform from Chrysler. The VW Group has been masterful at managing it large cache of brands, and would certainly have the capital leverage needed to breath new life in the Fiat, Alfa-Romeo, and Maserati product portfolios, as well. Make it happen!
And now, on Monday, the investment bankers are still planting stories advocating the divestment of Nissan as that is the only way the Renault/FCA merger could clear US anti-trust scrutiny, so the bankers can collect their multi-million dollar fees. "Exclusive: FCA-Renault revival may hinge on Nissan stake cut - sources" https://finance.yahoo.com/news/exclusive-fca-renault-revival-may-031400971.html While the French government, as a Renault stakeholder, supports the alliance as, long term, Renault realizes more synergies with Nissan. "France's Le Maire says 'essential' to bolster Renault-Nissan alliance" https://www.reuters.com/article/us-renault-m-a-fiat-chrysler-le-maire/frances-le-maire-says-essential-to-bolster-renault-nissan-alliance-idUSKCN1TA0AD So, who will win, the bankers looking to make a quick buck, or the French government, more concerned with the long term viability of Renault, and Renault worker's jobs?