Problem Solved? 2020 Chevrolet Camaro SS Dons New Face, Placating an Outraged Public

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It was something we bitched and moaned about to no end in these digital pages. While most iterations of the refreshed 2019 Chevrolet Camaro looked, well, fresh, the popular SS model clearly fell on its face sometime before leaving the factory.

By blacking out the grille’s thick horizontal crossbar and migrating the bowtie emblem from the upper opening to a central position, Chevy designers greatly increased the face’s visual height. The resulting Camaro SS looked somewhat ill; its chiselled, Brad Pitt-like visage contorted into a Karl Malden-esque countenance.

It looks like rumors of an emergency refresh were 100 percent true, as the 2020 model, seen above, has emerged from under the knife with a new nose. For the upcoming model year, Chevy also wants to get you into a V8 for less cash.

Both your author and Matthew Guy griped about the SS’s “derpy” face (his words, not mine), which looked awful next to the clean look of, say, the 1LE. (See the 2019 SS below.) The SEMA show car revealed shortly after the 2019 model’s introduction, as well as Chevy’s NASCAR Xfinity Series entry, hinted that the automaker was having sudden second thoughts about the model’s appearance.

Mr. Guy suggested his own fix, which placed the Chevy emblem back up where it belongs. The company went one further, making the fat crossbar body-colored, further reducing visual height.

Indeed, Chevrolet is willing to (tacitly) admit it made a mistake.

“Customers spoke, and we listened,” said Steve Majoros, director of Chevrolet passenger car and crossover marketing, in a statement. “The overwhelmingly positive reaction to the Shock’s stylized design helped prompt its transition from concept to production.”

Changes to the Camaro line don’t end with the SS, as there’s a sales slide to arrest. For the upcoming model year, Chevy is adding an LT1 trim to the roster, which can only indicate the presence of a GM V8 engine. In this case, a 455-horsepower, 6.2-liter eight-cylinder borrowed from the SS and dropped into a model positioned between the LT and SS.

After-destination sticker price for the LT1 is $34,995, three grand below a base 2019 SS, with buyers offered a choice of six-speed manual or 10-speed automatic transmission. Coupe and convertible bodystyles are available.

Elsewhere, content changes abound, with the V6-powered LT models gaining a 10-speed auto (tailored for V6 performance, Chevy claims). All models can be had with Rally Green paint, red seatbelts and kneepads, and alloy pedals, while LS and LT models can be optioned out with rear spoilers and tinted tail lamps. Twenty-inch wheels and a choice of red or orange brake calipers appear on the LT, LT1, and SS option lists. Recaro performance seats migrate from the 1LE to the LT, as well.

The (V6) 3LT trim added for 2019 can now be had with the 2.0-liter turbo four and Chevy’s Convenience and Lighting package.

All of these changes come as General Motors attempt to reverse the pony car’s falling sales. Last year saw Camaro sales fall 25 percent, though the first quarter of 2019 showed the model up 2.5 percent. Offering more for less is a time-honored ploy to populate showrooms, and so is undercutting your competition. A base 2019 Ford Mustang GT coupe stickers for $36,350 after destination, placing the cheaper Camaro V8 in good standing. However, an existing cash incentive pushes the base Mustang V8’s price $45 lower than that of the 2020 Camaro LT1.

Pricing for the full Camaro line should come into focus before the 2020 model goes on sale this fall.

[Images: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 32 comments
  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
  • Dave Holzman '08 Civic (stick) that I bought used 1/31/12 with 35k on the clock. Now at 159k.It runs as nicely as it did when I bought it. I love the feel of the car. The most expensive replacement was the AC compressor, I think, but something to do with the AC that went at 80k and cost $1300 to replace. It's had more stuff replaced than I expected, but not enough to make me want to ditch a car that I truly enjoy driving.
  • ToolGuy Let's review: I am a poor unsuccessful loser. Any car company which introduced an EV which I could afford would earn my contempt. Of course I would buy it, but I wouldn't respect them. 😉
  • ToolGuy Correct answer is the one that isn't a Honda.
  • 1995 SC Man it isn't even the weekend yet
Next