Ford Again Shifts Into Recall Mode, Citing Rollaway Risk

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Recalls to prevent cars from rolling away from their owners have become commonplace, and Ford is no stranger to the phenomenon. Last year, the automaker recalled 550,000 Fusions and Escapes to replace vulnerable automatic transmission shift cables that could leave the car in the wrong gear, regardless of where the driver positions the shift lever.

On Wednesday, Ford announced a recall for the exact same problem, plus a second one for a similar issue. While the Fusion makes up the bulk of the affected vehicles, the brand new Ranger pickup also finds itself on the receiving end of some unwanted PR.

The recall covers 2013-2016 Fusions equipped with the base 2.5-liter inline-four, built at both the Flat Rock assembly plant in Michigan and Ford’s Hermosillo, Mexico facility. That model year range is the same last last year’s recall, though these vehicles weren’t included in the earlier call-back.

In total, some 270,000 Fusions in North America are under recall for a shift cable bushing that can degrade, causing the cable to detach from the transmission. Should this happen, a vehicle can remain in a drive gear even after the owner shifts into park. The automaker claims it has three reports of property damage and one injury on file as a probably result of the problem.

Of the total, just over 10,000 afflicted vehicles were sold in Canada, with another 3,000 found in Mexico.

A second, separate recall impacts owners of the 2019 Ranger. Ford wants about 2,500 U.S. examples of the pickup back in the shop to check fasteners that secure the transmission shift cable bracket. If not torqued to proper specs, the fasteners could let go, leading to the same outcome as in the Fusion recall. Some 260 Rangers are under recall in Canada.

“Dealers will properly torque the two fasteners and verify the proper operation of the transmission selector assembly according to established workshop manual procedure,” the company stated.

Owners of both sets of vehicles are advised to make good use of their parking brake.

Last month, Fiat Chrysler recalled a slew of Darts that could become wayward after their shift cables detach. This recall, like the others, follow a period in which automakers, most notably Fiat Chrysler, rushed to deal with problems resulting from unorthodox shift levers placed in automatic-equipped vehicles. Dials and “return to center” monostable shifters led to customer confusion, forcing automakers to install auto-park features to prevent accidental runaways. For Ford, the feature was worth bragging about.

[Image: Chris Tonn/TTAC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • Carrera Carrera on May 15, 2019

    Don't see too many of these on the roads. Seen two so far. Either they don't sell or they are not fully out in force yet

  • Schmitt trigger Schmitt trigger on May 15, 2019

    Ford, or the automotive companies are not alone on this behavior. If one reads the multiple accounts from many news outlets regarding the 737MAX fiasco, they seem to agree that the failure was related to what has euphemistically been called "stock-market capitalism". Which simply means: the corporations have to meet the market's financial expectations, such that stock price will continue to rise, and damn the torpedoes! All of them.

  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
  • Dave Holzman '08 Civic (stick) that I bought used 1/31/12 with 35k on the clock. Now at 159k.It runs as nicely as it did when I bought it. I love the feel of the car. The most expensive replacement was the AC compressor, I think, but something to do with the AC that went at 80k and cost $1300 to replace. It's had more stuff replaced than I expected, but not enough to make me want to ditch a car that I truly enjoy driving.
  • ToolGuy Let's review: I am a poor unsuccessful loser. Any car company which introduced an EV which I could afford would earn my contempt. Of course I would buy it, but I wouldn't respect them. 😉
  • ToolGuy Correct answer is the one that isn't a Honda.
  • 1995 SC Man it isn't even the weekend yet
Next