What Will Lincoln Look Like in 2020?

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Lincoln, eager to avoid the fate of Mercury, has spent years attempting to turn itself around. It’s a slow-and-steady kind of race. Rather than try to dazzle the public with a slick marketing campaign (confusing, perhaps – Ed.), Lincoln’s sticking to the fundamentals. Bludgeoned by the Great Recession, Lincoln’s sales actually began their steady decline in 2004, though by that time it had been losing market share for almost a decade.

Fortunately, things improved. While still far removed from its former strength, Lincoln’s annual domestic volume has stabilized at just above 100,000 units. Chasing sales will always be important for an automaker, but it’s not the main focus for Ford’s luxury nameplate. The brand believes that, if it can improve as a premium marque, volume will follow.

Even if you’re not a fan of its products, you have to admit that its newest models are a breath of fresh air. The Aviator (below) may not have the powertrain options of the MKT (above), but it’s better in every other conceivable way. You don’t even need to drive them; one can simply look at them side by side and sense there’s more going on with the Aviator.

The Corsair seems as though it will be a similar story. Replacing the MKC, the new crossover emits a sense of class its predecessor lacked. While examining the compact newcomer at the New York Auto Show, a Lincoln rep almost shuddered when we referenced the MKC — almost as if the brand was ashamed of it. However, those older vehicles were still quiet and comfortable automobiles, two qualities the brand isn’t willing to toss into the garbage for the sake of added performance. Comfort is king at Lincoln, and the brand wants to emphasize its strengths.

“It appears they’ve accepted who they are,” Jeff Schuster, president of global forecasting at LMC Automotive, said in a recent interview with Automotive News. “They’re not a volume premium brand that’s going to be everything for everyone. That’s OK; you don’t have to be everything to everyone to still be successful.”

Lincoln’s own design director, David Woodhouse, did nothing to refute that assertion. “It’s more about seduction than attack,” he said.

The brand’s new aviation/nautical theme is meant to remind customers of quiet and comfortable modes of upscale travel. But it also allows the company to abandon its failed alphanumeric naming strategy, which we always assumed was a foolish attempt to make it seem more German or Japanese. We couldn’t be happier with the change.

Lincoln chief Joy Falotico, who also broke things down for Automotive News, believes that the path ahead won’t include shortcuts or an emphasis on fleet sales. Falotico suggests that Lincoln should serve as a boutique brand, rather than a “luxury shopping mall” (poor Mark Fields), while admitting that volume is important. As the brand struggles to put down roots in China, Falotico claims the current strategy involves encouraging market growth “in a healthy way.”

By the end of this year, Lincoln will have four new utility vehicles on the market wearing updated (and much improved) sheet metal. Beyond that, Falotico said the brand will focus on gradually electrifying the lineup and ensuring customers don’t lose interest. “We’ve had to redo our whole philosophy of the cycle plan and add in an experience and service cycle plan and smaller packages that give you something new to show the customer,” she said. “They’re very sensitive to the freshness of the product.”

While most of what that means in terms of product is supposed to remain a mystery, Falotico did say the brand will provide extra performance packages and special editions. We also know that hybridization will begin creeping in as an option for most models (a plug-in Corsair follows the model’s launch by a year or less, with a potential EV on the horizon) and extra-premium variants are at least under development. It’s impossible to say if the strategy will pan out as desired, though it does look like the right play: a gentle rebranding aimed at gaining — and retaining — customers willing to splurge on higher-margin vehicles, coupled with improvements to its entire product line.

“We have a vehicle in every segment, except the luxury performance segment, so we feel we have roughly the right number of vehicles,” she said. “We’re not like some other manufacturers who don’t have mass-market brands, so you see them continue to extend their lineup. That’s not us. Having said that, we’re looking at derivatives that make sense.”

[Images: Ford Motor Co.]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 49 comments
  • Rocket Rocket on Apr 24, 2019

    What will they look like? If the Zephyr is the car I anticipate, they'll be just a flagship short of the brand Cadillac should be. I don't know if the stock market will care, but customers are already taking notice.

  • Cpmanx Cpmanx on Apr 25, 2019

    Well, SUVs make up the bulk of sales for Mercedes, BMW, Audi, Lexus, Porsche, Jaguar. Acura, etc. The MKZ and Continental barely sell. I think that's your answer.

    • Bd2 Bd2 on Apr 28, 2019

      That's true more so for also-rans in the lux sedan/car race (Acura, Audi, etc.) than for MB and BMW which still sell plenty of sedans/cars (albeit, even they aren't immune to the switch to CUVs). Even Lexus is struggling to sell its (RWD) sedans, aside from the FWD ES.

  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could be made in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next