Unifor Official: Expect an All-Wheel Drive Chrysler Pacifica

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

More voices are piping up, alerting minivan-loving North Americans to a future offering from Fiat Chrysler. With the segment shrinking in the face of overwhelming competition from spacious, pleasant-riding crossovers, the possibility of an all-wheel drive Chrysler Pacifica is big news, and one Canadian union official claims it’s on the way.

In the minivan market, it looks like Toyota’s Sienna won’t stand alone as the only AWD offering for long.

According to Automotive News, Dave Cassidy, president of Unifor Local 444, FCA claims will begin retooling its Windsor, Ontario assembly plant this summer to add the AWD version to the minivan mix. This move, Cassidy said, could lengthen the plant’s planned July shutdown for an additional three weeks.

FCA hasn’t confirmed the AWD Pacifica or the extended downtime, which would push Windsor’s downtime to five weeks.

Earlier this month, another report, drawing on a number of sources, claimed FCA indeed plans to offer a more capable Pacifica, after passing on the idea at the time of the model’s launch. In that piece, another Unifor official said FCA was exploring the possibility of an AWD Pacifica. Joe McCabe, CEO of AutoForecast Solutions, said his sources pointed to a second-quarter 2020 launch of the grippier minivan, adding that the move would bring “relevance” to the model.

Certainly, adding AWD would cause more than a few Pacifica fence-sitters to switch their outlook from “maybe” to “buy” — especially those living in inclimate regions of the continent. Toyota Canada claims 58 percent of the Siennas it sold last year were AWD models.

Windsor Assembly saw a number of shutdowns this past winter. A two-week January idle period sought to pare down inventories of the Pacifica and Dodge Grand Caravan, while a parts shortage in February saw the plant go dark for a week. Over the first two months of 2019, Pacifica sales fell 24 percent in the United States, with the Grand Caravan falling 27 percent. Last year, Pacifica sales rose 21 percent over the previous year’s tally, with Pacifica sales staying static.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 44 comments
  • Tele Vision Tele Vision on Mar 25, 2019

    As a kid growing up in the country my first two cars were station wagons. Studded snow tires were mandatory in order to reliably get down to the highway - even down the driveway, sometimes. My next car was a Ford Tempo. It had the hilarious 5-speed and the crap 4-holer. Crucially, with 98% of its weight on the front suspension, it also had front-wheel drive. I quickly secured a set of chains for the front tires and, thusly-equipped, that thing would go places in the snow that would make an M1A1 Abrams take pause. Do I want that scene in my life again? Negative. AWD/4WD being common is an excellent thing. My only complaint now is that, while pricing out a new F-150 on the online, 4X4 added something like CDN$4000 to the cost. I'll keep buying used, in that case. I can fix it.

  • Kosmo Kosmo on Mar 26, 2019

    Maybe this will give Toyota a kick in the pants. There isn't much difference between my 2011 AWD Sienna and the 2019 version.

    • See 2 previous
    • Jalop1991 Jalop1991 on Mar 26, 2019

      @SpinnyD I call BS. Toyota will let it ride like Dodge has let the Grand Caravan ride. Minivans reached peak whatever a few years ago; as long as it's cheap to manufacture while meeting federal regulations, why change anything.

  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. Will be watching this with interest. 😉
  • Carson D I'd go with the RAV4. It will last forever, and someone will pay you for it if you ever lose your survival instincts.
  • THX1136 A less expensive EV would make it more attractive. For the record, I've never purchased a brand new vehicle as I have never been able to afford anything but used. I think the same would apply to an EV. I also tend to keep a vehicle way longer than most folks do - 10+ years. If there was a more affordable one right now then other things come to bear. There are currently no chargers in my immediate area (town of 16K). I don't know if I can afford to install the necessary electrical service to put one in my car port right now either. Other than all that, I would want to buy what I like from a cosmetic standpoint. That would be a Charger EV which, right now, doesn't exist and I couldn't afford anyway. I would not buy an EV just to be buying an EV. Nothing against them either. Most of my constraints are purely financial being 71 with a disabled wife and on a fixed income.
  • ToolGuy Two more thoughts, ok three:a) Will this affordable EV have expressive C/D pillars, detailing on the rocker panels and many many things happening around the headlamps? Asking for a friend.b) Will this affordable EV have interior soft touch plastics and materials lifted directly from a European luxury sedan? Because if it does not, the automotive journalists are going to mention it and that will definitely spoil my purchase decision.c) Whatever the nominal range is, I need it to be 2 miles more, otherwise no deal. (+2 rule is iterative)
  • Zerofoo No.My wife has worked from home for a decade and I have worked from home post-covid. My commute is a drive back and forth to the airport a few times a year. My every-day predictable commute has gone away and so has my need for a charge at home commuter car.During my most recent trip I rented a PHEV. Avis didn't bother to charge it, and my newly renovated hotel does not have chargers on the property. I'm not sure why rental fleet buyers buy plug-in vehicles.Charging infrastructure is a chicken and egg problem that will not be solved any time soon.
Next