Tesla Model 3 Mid Range Fades From View

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

First, it faded from the automaker’s ordering page — a disappearance noted on Sunday. Introduced last October as a cheaper stepping stone to the Model 3 lifestyle (and a sort-of apology for the then-undelivered $35,000 Standard Range), Tesla’s Mid Range variant offered 260 miles of driving range, compared to the 310 miles available to Model 3 Long Range drivers.

With the Standard Range now available to order, the Mid Range apparently serves no purpose in the Tesla stable.

Available only with black paint in base trim, the $35,000 Standard Range’s delivery date was recently pushed back from two to four weeks to perhaps eight. For those who longed for the model since the Model 3’s debut three years ago, what’s another few weeks of waiting?

Anyway, the Standard Range version offers a 220-mile driving radius, and the addition of a Standard Range Plus (240 miles) for an extra $2,000 makes the Mid Range model redundant. There’s some debate as to whether the cheapest Tesla is, in fact, profitable. Certainly, there was a clear financial reason for the lengthy delay in getting the model to consumers, not to mention the earlier release of a much pricier performance version of the dual motor model.

The quiet execution of the Model 3 Mid Range comes on the heels of last week’s strangely unenthusiastic launch of the Model Y — a Model 3-based compact crossover designed to mine customers in the juicy $40-$50k SUV segment. That model arrives late next year in two flavors: a Standard Range model with 230 miles of driving range, stickering for $39,000 (before destination), and a $47,000 Long Range model with 300 miles of driving distance packed into its battery.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk said buyers of the cheaper version should expect their vehicles “sometime in 2021.”

Due to an abortive attempt to shutter its retail stores, Tesla plans to raise the recently dropped prices of all vehicles — sans Model 3 Standard Range — later this week by an average of 3 percent.

[Image: Tesla]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 29 comments
  • Moose&Squirrel Moose&Squirrel on Mar 18, 2019

    With t̶h̶e̶ ̶S̶t̶a̶n̶d̶a̶r̶d̶ ̶R̶a̶n̶g̶e̶ ̶n̶o̶w̶ many other more affordable and higher quality EV options already or soon available t̶o̶ ̶o̶r̶d̶e̶r̶, the M̶i̶d̶ ̶R̶a̶n̶g̶e̶ ̶a̶p̶p̶a̶r̶e̶n̶t̶l̶y̶ entire line-up of Tesla vehicles serves no purpose i̶n̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶T̶e̶s̶l̶a̶ ̶s̶t̶a̶b̶l̶e̶. FIFY

    • See 2 previous
    • HotPotato HotPotato on Mar 19, 2019

      @SCE to AUX Yep. So far we have CARB compliance cars, and cars that cost as much as a Tesla but aren't even remotely as desirable. Lots of talk from the established manufacturers, still jack to show at the dealer.

  • SharkDiver SharkDiver on Mar 18, 2019

    Think I'll just hang on to my heavily modified '06 Vette and lifted '99 Tahoe.

  • Fred I would get the Acura RDX, to replace my Honda HR-V. Both it and the CRV seats are uncomfortable on longer trips.
  • RHD Now that the negative Nellies have chimed in...A reasonably priced electric car would be a huge hit. There has to be an easy way to plug it in at home, in addition to the obvious relatively trickle charge via an extension cord. Price it under 30K, preferably under 25K, with a 200 mile range and you have a hit on your hands. This would be perfect for a teenager going to high school or a medium-range commuter. Imagine something like a Kia Soul, Ford Ranger, Honda CR-V, Chevy Malibu or even a Civic that costs a small fraction to fuel up compared to gasoline. Imagine not having to pay your wife's Chevron card bill every month (then try to get her off of Starbuck's and mani-pedi habits). One car is not the solution to every case imaginable. But would it be a market success? Abso-friggin-lutely. And TTAC missed today's announcement of the new Mini Aceman, which, unfortunately, will be sold only in China. It's an EV, so it's relevant to this particular article/question.
  • Ajla It would. Although if future EVs prove relatively indifferent to prior owner habits that makes me more likely to go used.
  • 28-Cars-Later One of the biggest reasons not to purchase an EV that I hear is...that they just all around suck for almost every use case imaginable.
  • Theflyersfan A cheaper EV is likely to have a smaller battery (think Mazda MX-30 and Mitsubishi iMEV), so that makes it less useful for some buyers. Personally, my charging can only take place at work or at a four-charger station at the end of my street in a public lot, so that's a crapshoot. If a cheaper EV was able to capture what it seems like a lot of buyers want - sub-40K, 300+ mile range, up to 80% charging in 20-30 minutes (tops) - then they can possibly be added to some lists. But then the issues of depreciation and resale value come into play if someone wants to keep the car for a while. But since this question is asking person by person, if I had room for a second car to be garaged (off of the street), I would consider an EV for a second car and keep my current one as a weekend toy. But I can't do a 50K+ EV as a primary car with my uncertain charging infrastructure by me, road trips, and as a second car, the higher insurance rates and county taxes. Not yet at least. A plug in hybrid however is perfect.
Next