Report: Cost-conscious Ford to Slash Russian Operations

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The Blue Oval brand stands to seriously pare back its Russian presence, a new report claims, with two of the automaker’s three assembly plants rumored to close. Ford entered into a joint venture in the country in 2011, partnering with Russia’s Sollers. The two recently reached a new agreement, Sollers claims, but details remain scarce.

One person with knowledge of the pact claims Ford will cut its passenger car operations, leaving only its commercial vehicle business. More market share for the resurgent Lada, it seems.

Rumors of looming cuts have swirled since the beginning of the year. Like its European and South American businesses, Ford’s Russia venture was placed under the microscope in the company’s wide-ranging search for savings.

Speaking to Bloomberg, the source said Ford’s global restructuring plan will likely leave the automaker with just one Russian plant. The plants fingered for closure, in St. Petersburg and Tatarstan, assemble Focus, Mondeo, Fiesta and Ecosport models, while a third plant cranks out Ford commercial vehicles and a brace of utility vehicles — the Kuga and Explorer. An official announcement could come Wednesday.

Last month, the Russian industry journal AutoReview (via Wards Auto) reported that Ford’s future production efforts would consist solely of the Transit van. Existing passenger car models would either be imported or discontinued.

Russia’s new car market is on the ascent following a deep recession that cratered demand. Ford, however, hasn’t been a recipient of much of that new consumer spending. Sales never fully rebounded after volume losses of 38.2 percent in 2014 and 41.5 percent in 2015.

In 2018, Ford sales rose 5.7 percent in a market that grew by 12.8 percent, losing market share to better-selling import brands like Nissan, Volkswagen, Toyota, Hyundai, and Kia. The Blue Oval’s take of the Russian new car market was just 3 percent last year, compared to Lada’s 20 percent. The patriotic domestic brand’s sales rose 15.6 percent in 2018 on the success of the Vesta vehicle family, which recently celebrated the arrival of a new crossover.

[Image: Ford]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Mar 26, 2019

    It seems like Ford cannot sell cars anywhere on the globe. How about SUVs? My take is: Ford do not skip on updating existing products - update improve every 5 years. If you sell the same car unchanged for 10 years and then declare it dead of course you will loose market share. When Ford will learn? Wasn't that the reason why AMC is dead?

  • Steve203 Steve203 on Mar 27, 2019

    Considering that Ford is losing money everywhere in the world, other than North America, they can pretty much toss a dart at a world map to decide which loss making operation to wind down next.

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next