QOTD: Making Progress at the Pump?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The EPA’s annual fuel economy report showed a continued slow climb in the number of miles an average vehicle can travel on a gallon of gas, with 2018’s fleetwide figure expected to come in at 25.4 mpg. Weighted for sales, the picture might not be as rosy, as moar light trucks and fewer cars conspire to ensure real-world stasis.

But one man’s stable is not a fleet, so let’s judge our actions on an individual basis. How efficient is your current vehicle compared to your first?

Yours truly will go first, so prepare yourselves for some staid economy action. My first vehicle was the oft-mentioned base 2.2-liter Sundance with a gigantic fuel gauge standing in place of a tachometer. That gauge, ahem, wouldn’t have served much use.

The grandfather clock-sized fuel indicator did, however, alert young Steph to the fact that his small green coupe rarely achieved its EPA ambitions, regardless of driving style. For some time, sticky valves and a catalytic convertor that longed to star in The China Syndrome kept average gas mileage in the sub-20 mpg range. Combined EPA rating for a base, stick-shift ’93 model? 26 mpg. After fixing the aforementioned issues and achieving the promised economy, I pawned it off on a coworker and swore off Chrysler Corp for good. The fuel pump died a week later.

Should’ve saved up for a Duster!

Fast-forward 19 years and Cruze, Version 2.0 sits in the driveway. Too bad it’s not a Ram Rebel. Oh well. Anyhoo, a stick-shift 2018 Cruze rates a 32 mpg combined figure, meaning I’ve achieved an on-paper increase of 8 mpg between first car and last. Along the way, this writer’s cheap economy car added 60 hp and 55 lb-ft of torque. Curb weight rose from 2,608 pounds to 2,842 pounds.

That’s my entry-level story — what’s yours?

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 103 comments
  • Dividebytube Dividebytube on Mar 11, 2019

    First car I drove a lot was a 1984 Nissan truck, king cab with the 2.4L 4-banger. Mileage? I have no idea but it wasn't anything great. High teens in the city, low-20s highway would be my best guess. It was a 3-speed automatic and it was also the 55-stay-alive days. The first car that I owned, at the tender age of 17, was a 1968 Firebird with a 2-speed Powerglide (!) and a 400cid Pontiac engine. IIRC 12mpg was my average; which consumed most of my earnings of $3.50 an hour at 20 hours a week. I really didn't track MPG back then, just filled up as needed. Current car is a 2014 Mustang V6 - I average 15 to 16mpg in the city, can easily knock over 25mpg on the highway.

  • THX1136 THX1136 on Mar 11, 2019

    '72 Charger w/318 - 22 mpg highway. '98 Stratus w/2.4L - 34 mpg highway. Both figures from actual road trips of more than 100 miles. The '84 Shelby Charger I had got right at 35 mpg highway with the 2.2L.

  • Lorenzo They won't be sold just in Beverly Hills - there's a Nieman-Marcus in nearly every big city. When they're finally junked, the transfer case will be first to be salvaged, since it'll be unused.
  • Ltcmgm78 Just what we need to do: add more EVs that require a charging station! We own a Volt. We charge at home. We bought the Volt off-lease. We're retired and can do all our daily errands without burning any gasoline. For us this works, but we no longer have a work commute.
  • Michael S6 Given the choice between the Hornet R/T and the Alfa, I'd pick an Uber.
  • Michael S6 Nissan seems to be doing well at the low end of the market with their small cars and cuv. Competitiveness evaporates as you move up to larger size cars and suvs.
  • Cprescott As long as they infest their products with CVT's, there is no reason to buy their products. Nissan's execution of CVT's is lackluster on a good day - not dependable and bad in experience of use. The brand has become like Mitsubishi - will sell to anyone with a pulse to get financed.
Next