Ghosn Tries to Speak With Alliance Board Over Big Changes, Blocked by Court

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Rather than focus entirely on his upcoming court case, Carlos Ghosn, the former chairman of the Renault–Nissan–Mitsubishi Alliance, attempted to gain access to a meeting at Nissan Motor Co. to explain himself to the board.

Unfortunately for the fallen industry titan, the Tokyo District Court said such a meeting would violate the terms of his bail by placing him in direct contact with individuals involved in the charges brought against him.

It makes sense why Ghosn wanted an audience. As the architect of the automotive alliance, he had hoped to solidify the union between Nissan and Renault through a merger. But the meeting was rumored to be aimed at developing a new board to oversee the alliance that would effectively replace the Amsterdam-based entities (Renault-Nissan BV and Nissan-Mitsubishi BV) that currently control it.

One reason to dismantle the existing structure deals directly with Ghosn’s legal battle. Internal investigations provided evidence that Ghosn may have funneled money through the Dutch units. However, Ghosn has repeatedly indicated that he believes the claimed misuse of funds were a distortion of reality on the part of Nissan, claiming he was set up after the company caught wind of him trying to oust its CEO and further consolidate the alliance.

According to Bloomberg, neither Nissan and Mitsubishi decided to comment on the reported new structure that will be discussed on Tuesday. The companies have scheduled a joint press conference at Nissan’s headquarters in Yokohama immediately afterward. The plan, as indicated by inside sources, is targeted at creating a more balanced decision-making structure between the three firms. Renault Chairman Jean-Dominique Senard, Nissan Chief Executive Officer Hiroto Saikawa and Mitsubishi Motors CEO Osamu Masuko, are all under consideration to chair the new committee — with Senard being the most likely candidate.

From Bloomberg:

Junichiro Hironaka, Ghosn’s lead attorney, said the car titan agreed to “severe” bail conditions — including staying in Japan, paying 1 billion yen in bail ($9 million), having cameras installed at the entrance and exit of his home, restrictions to using his mobile phone and having no access to the internet. Ghosn, as well as Greg Kelly, another Nissan executive arrested in the case, aren’t allowed to contact those involved with the investigations at Nissan, Renault and other entities.

Although Ghosn was stripped of his titles, he remains a director at Nissan and Renault. A meeting of Nissan shareholders set for April 8 will vote on whether to remove him from the board.

The bigger question is whether a planned merger between Nissan, Renault and Mitsubishi will happen. Although Nissan is said to have sought a review of the pact’s lopsided power structure that favored Renault, the two have pledged their allegiance to each other with plans to extend a two-decade accord.

Most are under the assumption that the alliance will forego the possibility of a full merger without Ghosn. Nissan and its shareholders have been categorically opposed to the idea. However, even if the court had allowed him to participate in the meeting, it’s doubtful anything would have changed.

“I don’t see how turning up at Nissan’s board meeting is going to change anything,” Janet Lewis, an analyst for Macquarie Capital Securities Ltd. in Tokyo, explained. “The alliance is working on how to improve its governance and how the new Renault leadership team can best work with Nissan and Mitsubishi. The Ghosn court case is a sideshow that should not impact the future direction of the alliance.”

[Image: Memory Stockphoto/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 5 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Mar 11, 2019

    It is a mad, mad, mad, mad Kafkaesque world. Will make Oscar winning movie. I know one British actor who would perfectly depict Ghosn.

  • EGSE EGSE on Mar 11, 2019

    Ghosn needs to realize his ties to the three companies are over and focus solely on his legal problems. How he comports himself could have a major influence on the outcome. If the French wanted him sprung and were willing to swallow their national pride to loosen their grip on Nissan/Mitsu, a back-channel understanding at the diplomatic level could work in his favor. Given their history with national pride, that seems improbable. Of course I only know what has been in the news and this is speculation on my part, so caveat emptor.

  • CanadaCraig I would like for this anniversary special to be a bare-bones Plain-Jane model offered in Dynasty Green and Vintage Burgundy.
  • ToolGuy Ford is good at drifting all right... 😉
  • Dave Holzman A design award for the Prius?!!! Yes, the Prius is a great looking car, but the visibility is terrible from what I've read, notably Consumer Reports. Bad visibility is a dangerous, and very annoying design flaw.
  • Wjtinfwb I've owned multiple Mustang's, none perfect, all an absolute riot. My '85 GT with a big Holley 4 barrel and factory tube header manifolds was a screaming deal in its day and loved to rev. I replaced it with an '88 5.0 Convertible and added a Supercharger. Speed for days, handling... present. Brakes, ummm. But I couldn't kill it and it embarrassed a lot of much more expensive machinery. A '13 Boss 302 in Gotta Have It Green was a subtle as a sledgehammer, open up the exhaust cut outs and every day was Days of Thunder. I miss them all. They've gotten too expensive and too plush, I think, wish they'd go back to a LX version, ditch all the digital crap, cloth interior and just the Handling package as an add on. Keep it under 40k and give todays kids an alternative to a Civic or WRX.
  • Jpolicke In a communist dictatorship, there isn't much export activity that the government isn't aware of. That being the case, if the PRC wanted to, they could cut the flow of fentanyl down to a trickle. Since that isn't happening, I therefore assume Xi Jinping doesn't want it cut. China needs to feel the consequences for knowingly poisoning other countries' citizens.
Next