BMW Takes Its EVs-from-China Plan Off the Burner

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Unlike another German automaker, BMW isn’t jumping into “electromobility” (gag) with both feet. There’s an element of restraint in the automaker’s electrification plans, unlike Volkswagen’s bid to put 1 billion EVs on the moon by next week. Thanks to this cautious blend of profit-mindedness and environmental consideration, we now have high-margin vehicles positioned above the X7 SUV. (Bimmer needs the dough for green things.)

But electric BMW vehicles are already here, and more are on the way. Normal-looking ones, too, like the iX3 crossover — a battery-electric version of the popular X3, due to start rolling out of China next year. At least, Bimmer was due to begin exporting it, until the automaker took the needle off the record.

According to a report in Reuters, the U.S.-China trade dispute has placed the company’s plans for a Chinese EV export hub in limbo.

“We have no basis for taking a decision at the moment. Whether this is financially viable and whether it makes sense needs to be evaluated,” said CEO Harald Krueger on the sidelines of the Geneva Motor Show.

Despite having plants in the U.S. and Europe, the financial benefits of building low- or no-margin EVs in China propelled that locale to the top of BMW’s list. The automaker bought a majority stake in its Chinese joint venture partner last year to pave the way for iX3 exports to foreign markets. The politics of trade intervened.

Last year, the Trump administration imposed tariffs on $250 billion in Chinese products, broken down as 25 percent on $50 billion in goods and 10 percent on the remainder. In the ongoing trade talks between the two nations, the U.S. has threatened to bump up the tariffs on that $200 billion bundle to 25 percent. An electric vehicle headed to the U.S. from that market would either be priced out of its class, or sold at a loss.

As such, BMW is holding its horses, waiting to see if China and the U.S. reach a mutually beneficial deal.

Another electric BMW product’s future is also looking hazy — that of the Mini EV. The automaker has a deal with China’s Great Wall Motors to build the thing, but that might not happen, either.

“That’s probably the most strategic question we discussed over the past two or three years,” said Peter Schwarzenbauer, BMW’s board member responsible for Mini. “With all the uncertainty around tariffs. I wouldn’t be able to give you a good answer of what will happen. The only option is to put yourself in a situation where you can react.”

China looks favorably on locally produced EVs, but BMW isn’t sure whether it’s keen on exporting Minis from that site. If conditions prove less than ideal in The People’s Republic, Schwarzenbauer said, it still has its UK and Netherlands assembly sites to fall back on.

[Image: BMW]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 9 comments
  • Asdf Asdf on Mar 09, 2019

    It is not a good idea to export Chinese-made cars. Who would want to buy cars made in a country with an aversion to making quality products, and who would trust an automaker that tries to sell such cars? BMW dodged a bullet here, just like Ford did when the plan to sell the Chinese-made Focus in the US was dropped.

    • Jatz Jatz on Mar 09, 2019

      I'm sure the employee hours required of a Western partner in a Chinese JV to ride herd on the Chinese tendency for chabuduo are onerous and prohibitive for low-margin vehicles. But I see no reason why that would prevent profitable exporting to the West of Chinese made luxury or virtue signaling cars. The QA would be merely another expensive component to be justified by the sale price. As long as China has the cheapest trainable labor and most corrupt regulatory environment things should be sweet until the Western companies have given up all their IP to the Borg.

  • Amca Amca on Mar 10, 2019

    Wait, that first picture isn't a BMW. It's that made in China Buick CUV thing. I can tell. The shape and the lines are identical.

    • Jatz Jatz on Mar 10, 2019

      No, look especially at the cut line for the hatch in the Envision's D-pillar; it's missing on the BMW. Also, BMW tail light shape is more complex. st.automobilemag.com/uploads/sites/11/2015/08/Buick-Envision-Chinese-Spec-rear-three-quarter.jpg

  • Marc Muskrat only said what he needed to say to make the stock pop. These aren't the droids you're looking for. Move along.
  • SCE to AUX I never believed they cancelled it. That idea was promoted by people who concluded that the stupid robotaxi idea was a replacement for the cheaper car; Tesla never said that.
  • 28-Cars-Later 2018 Toyota Auris: Pads front and back, K&N air filter and four tires @ 30K, US made Goodyears already seem inferior to JDM spec tires it came with. 36K on the clock.2004 Volvo C70: Somewhere between $6,5 to $8 in it all told, car was $3500 but with a wrecked fender, damaged hood, cracked glass headlight, and broken power window motor. Headlight was $80 from a yard, we bought a $100 door literally for the power window assembly, bodywork with fender was roughly a grand, brakes/pads, timing belt/coolant and pre-inspection was a grand. Roof later broke, parts/labor after two repair trips was probably about $1200-1500 my cost. Four 16in Cooper tires $62 apiece in 2022 from Wal Mart of all places, battery in 2021 $200, 6qts tranny fluid @ 20 is $120, maybe $200 in labor last year for tranny fluid change, oil change, and tire install. Car otherwise perfect, 43K on the clock found at 38.5K.1993 Volvo 244: Battery $65, four 15in Cooper tires @ $55 apiece, 4 alum 940 wheels @ roughly $45 apiece with shipping. Fixes for random leaks in power steering and fuel lines, don't remember. Needs rear door and further body work, rear door from yard in Gettysburg was $250 in 2022 (runs and drives fine, looks OK, I'm just a perfectionist). TMU, driven maybe 500 miles since re-acquisition in 2021.
  • 1995 SC I never hated these. Typical GM though. They put the wrong engine in it to start with, fixed it, and then killed it. I say that as a big fan of the aluminum 5.3, but for how they were marketing this it should have gotten the Corvette Motor at the start. Would be a nice cruiser though even with the little motor. The 5.3 without the convertible in a package meant to be used as a truck would have been great in my mind, but I suspect they'd have sold about 7 of them.
  • Rochester I'd rather have a slow-as-mud Plymouth Prowler than this thing. At least the Prowler looked cool.
Next