Short-term Shock: Goldman Sachs Forecasts an Oil Price Spike

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

While the 2019 fuel forecast calls for temperate prices at the pump, Goldman Sachs claims we could be in for a brief surge this spring.

Global oil production is expected to take a sizable hit next month. Saudi Arabia, along with the rest of OPEC, has been limiting production to prop up prices. Meanwhile, Venezuela is having trouble across the board. The nation’s ongoing political crisis has resulted in a steady decline in oil production since 2013, and U.S. sanctions effectively made doing business with Venezuela’s state-owned oil company, PDVSA, an impossibility overnight.

Considering the United States could undermine OPEC members by simply increasing shale drilling, another energy crisis is out of the question. However, that takes time, leaving a window where oil prices could shoot up by as much as 13 percent. Fortunately, Bloomberg reports that the window should be relatively small.

“The oil market will likely continue to tighten significantly this March and April,” Goldman Sachs analyst Jeffrey Currie explained. “While prices could easily trade in a $70-$75 a barrel trading range, we believe such an environment would likely prove fleeting.”

Currently, Brent Crude is sitting at about $65.85 per barrel, while U.S.-sourced oil is around $56.30 a drum.

From Bloomberg:

Saudi Arabia is guiding to March production around 500,000 barrels a day lower than its own quota, Currie said in the Feb. 25 note. At least 100,000 barrels a day of Venezuelan exports have been lost, and this could rise to a daily 200,000 to 300,000 barrels in coming months if there’s no political resolution, he said.

On the demand side, a surge in Chinese credit in January has eased fears of a slowdown in Asia’s biggest economy, the Federal Reserve is tilting dovish and consumption data from India, France and Italy points to stronger growth, Goldman said.

You’ll likely notice a modest bump at the pump and plenty of heated rhetoric emanating from politicians. Donald Trump took to Twitter earlier today to express his annoyance with the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries. “Oil prices getting too high,” the president said. “OPEC, please relax and take it easy. World cannot take a price hike — fragile!”

The world may not take it easy, but the United States should be able to weather this storm without too much trouble. Last week, the Energy Information Administration reported a 3.67 million barrel increase in U.S. oil supplies — far more than analysts expected. Earlier in the month, it also noted that U.S. shale output should rise by around 84,000 barrels a day through March of 2019, resulting in a record 8.4 million barrels per day. And all of this is happening as companies plan major investments in Texas and New Mexico to further raise crude production later this year.

That still means a lean supply for spring, but American motorists should come out on the other side relatively unscathed.

[Image: CC7/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 40 comments
  • Vulpine Vulpine on Feb 25, 2019

    The only surprise I feel is that it has taken so long in coming. Do not be surprised if over the next couple of years, fuel prices continue to rise to that $4+ region we visited about 8 years ago.

    • See 3 previous
    • Syncro87 Syncro87 on Feb 26, 2019

      I think the chance of that happening is fairly low, barring some sort of pretty major war / conflict.

  • Voyager Voyager on Feb 26, 2019

    No better way to get oil prices down, than to have more renewable energy and electric cars! THERE's where ALL car owners meet each other, have a mutual interest.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
  • BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
  • Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?
  • MaintenanceCosts E34 535i may be, for my money, the most desirable BMW ever built. (It's either it or the E34 M5.) Skeptical of these mods but they might be worth undoing.
  • Arthur Dailey What a load of cow patties from fat cat politicians, swilling at the trough of their rich backers. Business is all for `free markets` when it benefits them. But are very quick to hold their hands out for government tax credits, tax breaks or government contracts. And business executives are unwilling to limit their power over their workers. Business executives are trained to `divide and conquer` by pitting workers against each other for raises or promotions. As for the fat cat politicians what about legislating a living wage, so workers don't have to worry about holding down multiple jobs or begging for raises? And what about actually criminally charging those who hire people who are not legally illegible to work? Remember that it is business interests who regularly lobby for greater immigration. If you are a good and fair employer, your workers will never feel the need to speak to a union. And if you are not a good employer, then hopefully 'you get the union that you deserve'.
Next