QOTD: A Solution for FCA's Future?

by Corey Lewis

Published: February 12th, 2019

A dated product lineup, questionable fuel economy across the board, a general need for some reworking. These are all issues with Fiat Chrysler’s offerings in North America. Today we’ll try and come up with some solutions.

Today’s topic was generated by news yesterday of the $77 million in penalties FCA paid to the NHTSA, as its vehicles were not efficient enough to comply with fuel economy targets. But that’s not the only issue. Before we get into the weeds, let’s have a look at FCA’s current offerings on North American shores.

Dodge

Challenger
Charger
Durango
Grand Caravan
Journey

Chrysler

300
Pacifica

Ram

Ram trucks
ProMaster

Jeep

Wrangler
Renegade
Cherokee
Grand Cherokee
Compass

Fiat

500
500X
500L
124 Spider

Alfa Romeo

4C
Giulia
Stelvio

Maserati

Ghibli
Quattroporte
Levante
GranTurismo

FCA has more than one brand with an incomplete lineup, and several vehicles which are past due for replacement. Fiat sales have fizzled these past few years, and Chrysler hangs on with just two products on offer — one of which is fairly old. Jeep and Ram are company standouts, both of which are doing well. But that’s not enough. Alfa Romeo and Maserati will never bring the big volume FCA needs, so where do you begin?

Does it make sense to cull a brand or two, consolidating product offerings to save cash? How about refreshing products — do the Journey (successful abroad) and Charger (not) need replacements similar to their current forms? Is it too late for the super-lux Grand Wagoneer to land at Jeep showrooms?

Which route would you take to safeguard FCA’s future?

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

#AlfaRomeo #Cars #Chrysler #Dodge #Fca #Fiat #Jeep #Maserati #NewCars #NewsBlog #QOTD #Ram #Trucks #QuestionOfTheDay

Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 129 comments

Steve203 on Feb 13, 2019

It occurs to me that a lot of the weakness in US Fiat sales is a perception that Fiat will be withdrawn from the US market, and no-one wants an orphan. The best way to fight that perception of a zombie brand would be to introduce new Fiat brand products, in segments that are currently seeing a lot of demand. In Brazil, Fiat makes the Toro crew cab metric ton pickup. Fiat has under development a small 3 row SUV based on the Toro. Both the Toro and new SUV are built on the same platform as the Compass. The Toro would run afoul of the chicken tax due to it's Brazilian production, but if it and the Toro SUV were built for the US market at Toluca, where the US market Compass is built, it would duck the chicken tax. FCA has eliminated the policies that made it so expensive for a CDJR dealer to carry Fiats, so the new pickup and SUV could be carried in the same showroom as the other brands. What to call the Toro in the US? I like Rampage. So the Steve plan would have the Fiat line consisting of the toys: 500 and 124, the 500X and the Rampage pickup and SUV. But, the Fiat brand is poison to a lot of people. If the Rampage was called a Dodge, they would probably sell 10 times as many, but calling it a Dodge would fight the Dodge image of V8 pavement rippers. The Rampage would be perceived as too light duty to be a Ram, and not luxurious enough to be a Chrysler. Which brings us back to calling them Fiats.

Like Reply
DragDog on Feb 14, 2019

FCA is in good shape for drivetrains: GSE, GME I4/I6, (hybrid) Pentastar, (supercharged) Hemi. But most of their platforms are outdated and/or licensed; and they have too many brands struggling to be full-line. - Pull a "revenge of the K-car" and develop a new global subcompact/compact/midsize transverse FWD/AWD platform, for economy of scale. No one does this better than Mopar. - Giorgio continues as "the Alfa platform" - green-light a new sturdy, inexpensive longitudinal RWD/AWD "the Mopar platform" for muscle cars and unibody SUVs - green-light a new Model S-sized BEV platform - Cut the legacy platforms, legacy engines, separate Ram brand, separate SRT brand. reorganize Jeep-Alfa as global premium brands Jeep = global full-line, crossover/SUV-only, offroad-capable. Great potential to make Jeep synonymous with rugged tall ride-height vehicles worldwide. Wrangler/Gladiator continue redesign Renegade, Compass, Cherokee on new transverse platform redesign Grand Cherokee on new Mopar platform rebadge the Fiat emerging market products (Mobi) as Jeeps Alfa = global drivers' cars in between Mazda and BMW, filling the gap left by BMW's softening. They can't out-refine BMW, but they can out-pure-of-heart them. Giulia and Stelvio carry over add roadster, coupe, larger sedan, larger crossover all on Georgio platform redesign MiTo and Giulietta on the new FWD platform only use GME I4 and I6 engines, with Alfa-specific Italian-style exhaust tuning Fiat = by and for Europe redesign the 500, Panda, Punto, Tipo, etc. on the new transverse platform drop the trucks/SUVs, that's now Jeep territory pull out of North America, it just didn't work out Maserati = Italian-style spare-no-expense EVs drop Ghibli redesign GranTurismo, Quattroporte, Levante as Tesla-fighting BEVs partner with some Italian fashion designer on interiors for marketing purposes be content with only 3 models and modest sales reorganize Dodge-Chrysler as North America-specific, shared dealership, full-line between the two of them Dodge = by and for "red state" USA; aggressive trucks and performance cars drop Journey and Caravan (Chrysler territory) Ram trucks merge back into Dodge redesign the Durango, Charger, Challenger, and Demon on new Mopar platform, all with a Hellcat option Dodge Daytona = restyled Alfa Giulietta QV Dodge Cuda sports car = restyled Hemi-powered Giulia coupe Chrysler = by and for "blue state" USA; eco-conscious tech-enabled people movers Pacifica continues Chrysler Journey = cheapest-possible 3-row crossover Cirrus/Aspen are crossovers based on Cherokee/Grand Cherokee with hybrid Pentastar 300 redesigned on new Mopar platform, with hybrid Pentastar or Hemi Fifth Avenue revived as Model S style BEV based on new Maserati Levante use recycled materials for marketing purposes

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.