QOTD: A Shock Cure?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Unlike other Questions of the Day, in which we tap your collective brain for the purposes of solving the world’s most pressing problems, today we focus all of that energy to benefit one man: your author — and by extension, the father of his godsons.

It’s advice time, and your subject is a quirky, low-volume SUV.

As you’ve already guessed, this friend is the same one who managed to get his hands on a 1999 Isuzu VehiCROSS Vehicross. The Trooper-derived Vehicross, which sold around 5,900 copies in the U.S. and Japan for three model years apiece, lately finds itself the subject of renewed collector interest.

It’s rugged, decently powerful, and unmistakably distinctive. No one misses your entrance. However, its on-road mannerisms bear no resemblance to that of the comfortable, car-based CUVs littering today’s highways. The Vehicross’ short wheelbase, solid rear axle, and ultra-stiff, rally-minded suspension means you’ll feel every imperfection, large and small. It came from the factory with monotube shocks outfitted with external reservoirs — great for blasting across the desert in Dakar, but less than ideal for sedate daily driving.

Having nearly cracked my teeth while riding over speed bumps at a walking pace in this thing, its reputation is well earned. However, that was two years ago, and my friend’s Vehicross has seen plenty of washboard country roads and crumbling city streets in the ensuing months. Its legs are tired; the fancy shocks are now toast, especially in the rear. With crashy-crashy now replaced by bouncy-bouncy, said friend wants to put an end to his trampoline-like existence.

He faces a choice: Outfit the Vehicross in as similar a manner as before, or find a middle ground that offers a balance, however lopsided, of off-road ability and on-road tranquility. Day to day liveability will surely win out.

As yours truly pilots a non-trail rated Cruze, I’ll leave it up to you to lend my friend advice. We’re talking specific shock (and perhaps spring) suggestions here; weigh in with your choices in the comments.

[Images: Steph Willems/TTAC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 19 comments
  • Slavuta Slavuta on Feb 13, 2019

    If you want my suggestion, I say, place is downrange. It will make a fine target

  • Qwer38456 Qwer38456 on Feb 13, 2019

    I have been driving a 95 Trooper since 98. With daily driving I would go through a set of shocks in less than 2 years. This includes Monroe, Rancho 5000 and a few store brands. The Bilsteins are the only ones I have found that have lasted any longer. I have stopped daily drive it but they did last more than two years when it became my families offroad and camping tank.

  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could be made in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next