Ford Explorer ST to Pack a Sizeable Premium

by Steph Willems

Published: February 15th, 2019

ford explorer st to pack a sizeable premium

Ford’s 2020 Explorer dons a new platform and familiar skin when it goes on sale this summer, and buyers looking for peak performance from their midsize SUV had best dig deeper for funds.

Compared to the 2019 Explorer Sport, which carries beneath its hood a 365-horsepower Ecoboost motor, fans of the 2020 Explorer ST stand to shell out an extra eight grand and change for their extra power.

This info comes by way of CarsDirect, which got its mitts on an Explorer order guide. Ford’s promise of a barely-changed entry price was indeed kept, with the base model 2020 Explorer stickering for $33,860 after destination — a $400 climb from 2019’s entry point.

The base model represents a bargain, as not only do buyers gain rear-drive architecture and revamped styling, they also get Ford’s Co-Pilot 360 safety features as standard equipment. Base power comes from a 2.3-liter Ecoboost four-cylinder generating 285 hp, mated to a 10-speed automatic.

But you didn’t come to TTAC to read about value-packed base models. No one ever does that. You came here because your Fiesta hot hatch is getting old and you’re thinking of swapping its ST badging with that of a (much) larger vehicle. While Explorer buyers gain power over 2019’s Explorer Sport, it’s a bit of a climb from the former sporty Explorer’s pricing.

CarsDirect claims the 2020 Explorer ST carries an after-destination price of $55,835, or $8,115 more than this year’s Explorer Sport. For that price, buyers gain a better-handling Explorer with 400 hp and 415 lb-ft of torque from a twin-turbo 3.0-liter V6 — an engine found in more prestigious Lincoln vehicles. The 2019 Explorer Sport’s 3.5-liter Ecoboost is rated at 365 hp and 350 lb-ft.

But that’s not the ceiling for the Explorer, regardless of model year. The top-flight Platinum model, priced at $55,260 for 2019, grows in cost to $59,345 for 2020. That’s a hike of $4,085. Options will take you solidly above the $60k marker.

As Ford attempts to squeeze more profit from its new-generation utilities, the bulk of the buying public will still congregate towards volume trims. With Ford, that means XLT. At $37,770, the 2020 Explorer XLT retails for $2,275 more than the 2019 model. Going the Limited route — a trim positioned below ST — will cost $49,225, or $5,365 more than the present model year.

One wonders how difficult it will be to find a base model Explorer on your local dealer’s lot.

[Images: Ford]

#2020FordExplorer #Explorer #Ford #FordExplorer #FordExplorerST #Pricing #SUVs

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

8 of 74 comments

Jatz on Feb 16, 2019

Aren't big HP engines in daily drivers like having a big schlong on Lesbos? Where you gonna use it?

Like Reply
- See 3 previous
- Hummer on Feb 16, 2019
  
  As far as my SS sedan goes I flirt with redline every time I drive it. A good power train need not go to waste.
  
  Like
- Jatz on Feb 16, 2019
  
  @Hummer "I can't get my car out of second gear."
  
  Like
- Hummer on Feb 16, 2019
  
  @jatz No usually flirt with red on 1st 2nd and 3rd; one time in 4th but only under a perfectly legal circumstance... I don’t see how that makes a difference, I’m using every last HP the engine has, and starting to get the itch to do headers, intake, tune, etc. This crazy idea that you can’t make use of 400-500 HP on the street baffles me now that I have it.
  
  Like
- Jatz on Feb 17, 2019
  
  @Hummer This site is a good place to learn respect for certain people with viewpoints and preferences opposite mine. Except about the absolute need for snow tires in North Flyover; no tolerance there.
  
  Like
Jfb43 on Feb 17, 2019

Too rich for my blood, for sure. But as others have said, it'll sell. This, in my opinion, is the best looking SUV on the market and people will pay for that. I think it now looks better than any Land Rover (which most people think of as the best looking SUV) which is way more expensive. This has the features, it has the proper RWD layout now, and it looks premium. It has the power of the Explorer name behind it. The question is, how close is too close between this and the Aviator? Lincoln needs to differentiate itself with different engines/powertrains, and this new Explorer essentially bridges the gap. I don't think the perception of luxury is enough for Lincoln.

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- EBFlex on Feb 18, 2019
  
  You think this Explorer is good looking? It looks like the last one (which was as boring as cold oatmeal) with a joker face for a grille. Ford has the laziest stylists in the industry.
  
  Like
- Ponchoman49 on Feb 20, 2019
  
  @EBFlex Most people I have shown this new RWD based Explorer said it looked too similar to the previous one. Looking at the above side shot I agree. Despite the price increases this will continue selling because Sport Utility! All joking aside most folks that get these lease them and typically go for the higher trim levels so the sticker matters little to them. For those that purchase this thing they will get a dose of sticker shock.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?
MaintenanceCosts E34 535i may be, for my money, the most desirable BMW ever built. (It's either it or the E34 M5.) Skeptical of these mods but they might be worth undoing.
Arthur Dailey What a load of cow patties from fat cat politicians, swilling at the trough of their rich backers. Business is all for `free markets` when it benefits them. But are very quick to hold their hands out for government tax credits, tax breaks or government contracts. And business executives are unwilling to limit their power over their workers. Business executives are trained to `divide and conquer` by pitting workers against each other for raises or promotions. As for the fat cat politicians what about legislating a living wage, so workers don't have to worry about holding down multiple jobs or begging for raises? And what about actually criminally charging those who hire people who are not legally illegible to work? Remember that it is business interests who regularly lobby for greater immigration. If you are a good and fair employer, your workers will never feel the need to speak to a union. And if you are not a good employer, then hopefully 'you get the union that you deserve'.