UAW Sues General Motors Over Temporary Workforce

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Last week a lawsuit was filed with the U.S. District Court in Youngstown claiming that General Motors is in violation of a “memorandum of understanding” with the United Automobile Workers by allowing temporary employees to support the launch of some new product from Fort Wayne Assembly Plant. The facility, which is responsible for manufacturing the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra pickups, is alleged to have brought on temporary workers from May to August of 2018 instead of using its laid-off full-time workers. The UAW claims this is decision represents a breach of contract.

The union says there are nearly 700 workers laid off from the “nearby” Lordstown, Ohio Assembly Plant — many of whom have applied to transfer to the Fort Wayne as is their right under the current contract with GM.

According to the lawsuit, GM continued the use the temporary workers even though the union rejected its request to extend temporary employment until the end of this coming February. However, the UAW said it did offer to allow the temps to work until the end of December, so long as GM could agree to submit a plan to eliminate the temporary group by then and transfer senior union members over to the facility in Fort Wayne.

“There are approximately 1,000 employees with contractual seniority rights currently on layoff nationwide who have Appendix A rights, including 690 seniority employees laid off at Lordstown Assembly, many of whom have applied to transfer to openings at Fort Wayne Assembly,” the lawsuit contends. “The Company, however, is circumventing the parties’ agreement on employee placement by employing temporary employees at Fort Wayne Assembly rather than transferring laid-off seniority employees under the provisions of Appendix A – Memorandum of Understanding Employee Placement.”

The lawsuit was filed on January 2nd and General Motors has had sufficient time to respond since then.

“Late last year, GM started the process to bring about 50 Lordstown employees to Ft. Wayne to fill some of the positions that had been covered by temporary employees,” the automaker told Michigan Radio in a statement on January 3rd. “In fact, about 35 Lordstown UAW members will be in place by the end of January. We have ongoing discussions with the UAW regarding our staffing needs in Ft. Wayne, but have no further comments on the lawsuit.”

Alleging a breach of contract, the UAW is requesting the court to force General Motors to stop using the temps in Fort Wayne and transfer union members to the plant. General Motors has already removed two shifts at its Lordstown facility and announced last year that it would stop making the Chevy Cruze at the plant in March. There has been no plans to replace the Cruze with another model, likely resulting in the factory being shuttered for the foreseeable future.

Our best guess is that GM knew it had to make an unpopular decision and would be involved with a prolonged fracas with the UAW as its deeply loathed restructuring plan warmed up anyway. Fort Wayne is nearly four hours away from Lordstown, resulting in a few troublesome and costly transfers for jobs that could have been sourced locally. That’s not going to help those that have already been laid off but that doesn’t seem to be an issue GM is all that interested in solving at this stage of its cost-cutting measures. Though, again, we’re just spitballing here.

[Image: GM]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Bullnuke Bullnuke on Jan 06, 2019

    This appears similar to Navistar International when the plant closed in Fort Wayne. There was trailer park community that built up north of the Springfield, Ohio, plant for the senior Fort Wayne employees to reside when transferring to Springfield for work there. There was a routine bus service for employees to move to and from their homes in Fort Wayne at the end of the work week over a distance of around 140 miles each way. This arrangement caused by the plant closing/work transfer lasted for ten or more years gradually disappearing with retirements/resignations in the work force. It's happened before and, as an aside, GM is building Chevrolet medium-duty trucks at the Springfield Navistar International plant today - the drive-off lots outside the plant were full of 'em last Wednesday.

  • Buickman Buickman on Jan 07, 2019

    bullshit. shut 'em down. there is no solidarity, no balls.

  • Doug brockman There will be many many people living in apartments without dedicated charging facilities in future who will need personal vehicles to get to work and school and for whom mass transit will be an annoying inconvenience
  • Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
  • Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
  • 28-Cars-Later " Electrek recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue. "Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
  • AMcA My theory is that that when the Big 3 gave away the store to the UAW in the last contract, there was a side deal in which the UAW promised to go after the non-organized transplant plants. Even the UAW understands that if the wage differential gets too high it's gonna kill the golden goose.
Next