Rare Rides: A Base Model Nissan Sentra Wagon From 1982
What’s Datsun, Nissan, and Sunny all over? It’s this pristine Nissan Sentra wagon, hailing from 1982.
The Sunny line started back in 1966 as a compact car which touted fuel efficiency and economical motoring as its most important qualities. Intended as a competitor to the Toyota Corolla, it was introduced the very same year.
A second generation launched for 1970, and in export markets was known as the Datsun 1200. This generation came to North America after Datsun made changes to interiors and bumpers to comply with new U.S. government regulations. The 1200 strengthened Datsun’s foothold in North America, with the company shifting about 44,000 units of its 1200 model each year between 1971 and 1973.
The third-generation Sunny was ready for 1974, now known to Americans as the B-210. Datsun kept the original Sunny’s characteristics intact, as the B-210 was one of the cheapest and most fuel-efficient cars American consumers could buy.
In 1978 a new Sunny debuted around the world, wearing a body which gained five inches in length over its predecessor. North America waited a little longer, as a new 210 (no B) was not available until 1979. This generation ran through 1982, when both Datsun and the Sunny had a last-of moment.
As the new model replaced the old in the latter half of 1982, it took with it the Datsun name, rear-drive layout, and the 210 moniker. This new vehicle was now front-drive, and called Sentra. It was sold by Nissan, and made available at your local Datsun-Nissan dealer. Available in coupe, hatch, sedan, and wagon formats, the Sentra had between two and five doors. It was the second model to utilize the no-numbers naming scheme introduced by Nissan in 1981, when it debuted the new Stanza at the New York Auto Show.
Along with front-wheel drive, the Sentra switched to a more modern overhead cam-style engine, rather than the prior 210’s overhead valve arrangement. All engines had four cylinders, of 1.5, 1.6, or 1.7 liters in displacement. Two manual transmissions were available (three- and four-speed), along with a three-speed automatic.
The new Sentra was immediately successful, once again offering low prices and fuel-sipping economy figures. In its first full year of sales for 1983, Sentra moved an impressive 209,889 examples. That figure made it the eighth most popular passenger car in America.
Before long, Nissan found itself preparing for the next generation of Sentra. Production moved to the company’s brand new Smyrna, Tennessee factory in 1985. In that year, the new factory built the old B11 Sentra as it readied itself for the incoming B12 Sentra in 1986. It’s worth mentioning the Rare Rides series has featured a B12 Sentra before, in the form of an imported right-hand and four-wheel drive Sunny sourced from Japan.
Today’s Rare Ride is from the first year of B11 Sentra production, 1982. In wagon format and with an automatic transmission, it’s traveled just over 55,000 miles. It seems to have the base 1.4-liter engine, and few power options to match those basic steel wheels. The ad copy has so many typos I can’t really read it, but eBay says the price is $2,999.
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Art Vandelay Best? PCH from Ventura to somewhere near Lompoc. Most Famous? Route Irish
- GT Ross The black wheel fad cannot die soon enough for me.
- Brett Woods My 4-Runner had a manual with the 4-cylinder. It was acceptable but not really fun. I have thought before that auto with a six cylinder would have been smoother, more comfortable, and need less maintenance. Ditto my 4 banger manual Japanese pick-up. Nowhere near as nice as a GM with auto and six cylinders that I tried a bit later. Drove with a U.S. buddy who got one of the first C8s. He said he didn't even consider a manual. There was an article about how fewer than ten percent of buyers optioned a manual in the U.S. when they were available. Visited my English cousin who lived in a hilly suburb and she had a manual Range Rover and said she never even considered an automatic. That's culture for you. Miata, Boxster, Mustang, Corvette and Camaro; I only want manual but I can see both sides of the argument for a Mustang, Camaro or Challenger. Once you get past a certain size and weight, cruising with automatic is a better dynamic. A dual clutch automatic is smoother, faster, probably more reliable, and still allows you to select and hold a gear. When you get these vehicles with a high performance envelope, dual-clutch automatic is what brings home the numbers.
- ToolGuy 2019 had better comments than 2023 😉
- Inside Looking Out In June 1973, Leonid Brezhnev arrived in Washington for his second summit meeting with President Richard Nixon. Knowing of the Soviet leader’s fondness for luxury automobiles, Nixon gave him a shiny Lincoln Continental. Brezhnev was delighted with the present and insisted on taking a spin around Camp David, speeding through turns while the president nervously asked him to slow down. https://academic.oup.com/dh/article-abstract/42/4/548/5063004
During the 1970s fuel crisis there was an ad for the 1200 about it using one gallon per day (I suppose for a 10-15~ish mile daily commute). (In the fourth-last paragraph, did you mean to write "Stanza" or "Sentra?")
God, what a miserable car. A rubbery shifter to access all one-point-four liters of power, 155mm wide rubber on 13" steel wheels, big rubber bumpers hanging off the ends, rubber flooring inside, rubbery vinyl on the seats...and you up front wishing you'd worn a rubber so you didn't have to trade in your old fun car for this one with its proper rear seat, Japanese reliability, and sensible fuel economy.