A Cheaper Audi EV's on the Way: Report

by Steph Willems

Published: December 18th, 2018

Customers won’t get a chance to buy an Audi E-tron SUV until next year, but, if money’s tight, they might want to hold off for a while. The German brand’s first electric utility vehicle (seen above) arrives in the second quarter of 2019, carrying a base price of $74,800 — at least once the launch editions clear out. More E-trons will follow, including a Sportback version of the SUV and a top-flight GT sports sedan.

Green, but still requiring plenty of green to plunk one in your driveway. Audi apparently has a solution for budget-minded premium EV shoppers, and it plans to make it happen with help from Volkswagen.

The MEB platform found beneath VW’s upcoming line of I.D.-badged electrics will set up shop beneath a new Audi SUV, Autocar reports.

The unnamed SUV will, naturally, be smaller in size than the E-tron, positioned between the overseas-only Q2 and familiar Q3 in terms of footprint. The model’s bound for a reveal in late 2019, the publication states, with a launch occuring the following year. Audi’s newest electric will likely bow as a 2021 model.

As one would expect, the little ute borrows design elements found on the larger E-tron. The model will appear with a similar shoulder line, grille and air intakes, according to Audi design boss Marc Lichte.

By borrowing VW’s architecture, Audi’s smallest EV could boast a pre-credit price as low as the high $30k range, which might not sound like a bargain for some. Audi’s two larger SUVs keep it in-house, using the brand’s modular longitudinal platform, while the upcoming GT is said to ride atop the bones used by the hard-to-pronounce Porsche Taycan.

Once here, the model will face competition from the Jaguar E-Pace in the fledgling (but poised to balloon) premium electric utility vehicle segment.

[Image: Audi]

#Audi #AudoE-tron #E-tron #ElectricVehicles #EVs #Luxury #Platforms #ProductPlanning #SUVs

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

18 of 25 comments

Sportyaccordy on Dec 18, 2018

Weird choice. I imagine this shape will appeal to urbanites. But they don't have anywhere to charge. Model 3 is a sedan and is selling like milk/egg/breads. IMO Audi or VW should bring the e-tron GT's beauty to the masses. A Jetta sized fastback with ~250HP and ~250 miles of range for ~$40-50K would be a killer.

Like Reply
- See 15 previous
- Nels0300 on Dec 18, 2018
  
  "to the masses...$40-$50K.." I want my next car to be electric, but they're going to have to get cheaper than they are now. Let me know when there is something equivalent to my 2017 Elantra Sport for $20K, but with an electric drivetrain, and I'm there. I don't know why they're not there yet being that my Elantra Sport is much more complicated and probably has ten times the mechanical parts as a Tesla Model 3. It's like comparing quartz watches vs automatics. The automatics are more complicated, more finicky, more expensive, and not as accurate.
  
  Like
- Kwong on Dec 18, 2018
  
  @nels0300 My used. We bought our 24K mile old Fiat 500e for $7,300 out the door and have saved over $4K on gasoline over the last 2 years. I would imagine a used Konai/Niro would be about $15K in 3 years.
  
  Like
- Kwong on Dec 18, 2018
  
  @kwong I mean to say Buy used. Not sure why I couldn't edit my typo.
  
  Like
- Sportyaccordy on Dec 18, 2018
  
  @nels0300 MSRP is just one piece of the puzzle. An electric car would be about $1000 less a year to fuel, and be much cheaper to maintain. So I would say a ~$30K electric car would be financially equivalent to your Elantra over ~5 years; especially if gas prices spike again.
  
  Like
- Sportyaccordy on Dec 18, 2018
  
  @kwong Someone has to buy new first.
  
  Like
- Nels0300 on Dec 18, 2018
  
  @sportyaccordy Yeah, the fuel cost savings definitely offset the price difference, but there really isn't any maintenance on the Elantra in the first 5 years besides oil changes which are cheap. Wipers, brakes, tires, etc will obviously still be needed on the electric car. I still think there should be a lot of room for prices to come down. Electric cars should be cheaper than ICE cars. Easier to manufacture, easier to engineer, much less complicated. How many people did Hyundai have to pay to develop the 2.0L Atkinson cycle engine, the 1.6L GDI turbo, the 6 speed hydraulic automatic, the 7 speed DCT, the 6 speed manual, the cooling systems for all of those options..... ....or they could just have two different battery capacities and / or electric motors. Electric cars should already be cheaper than ICE.
  
  Like
- Jkross22 on Dec 18, 2018
  
  @sportyaccordy That's what leasing is for. Buying a new electric vehicle at this point would be a foolish financial decision.
  
  Like
- Jkross22 on Dec 18, 2018
  
  @nels0300 Eventually electrics should be cheaper unless there's a badge to pay for. And until there's wider adoption, carmakers will have to charge (ha) more to recoup development and engineering costs. Just don't forget to plug in every night until wireless charging is available.
  
  Like
- Sportyaccordy on Dec 18, 2018
  
  @nels0300 Well $200/kWh is what it is... so for the ~65kWh pack that seems to be the standard you're talking about $13K. Then you still have the motor, differential and all the associated electronics and wiring. I wouldn't be shocked (ha ha) if a basic EV powertrain cost $20K w/no car attached. The 1.6T and 7DCT were developed long ago so outside of tweaks their development cost is done. A brand new 1.6T costs about $3400, I imagine the transmission may be $2000... even if you bundle in all the peripherals and accessories I doubt you'd crest $10K, and that's with dealer markup. So EVs have a long way to go to close the gap. Even if battery prices drop by half they will still have a slight premium as the motor and electronics will remain flat.
  
  Like
- Nels0300 on Dec 18, 2018
  
  @nels0300 R&D is amortized as intangible assets and the cost is amortized over the period of time that the R&D produces revenue....so Hyundai is still paying for this on their P&L. The batteries wouldn't be so expensive if automakers focused on developing them. Tesla started from scratch, built their own supercharger infrastructure that everyone said was too hard to do, and now they're challenging established automakers in sales while Elon smokes joints on TV. EVs weren't a priority for the big automakers, if they were, batteries would be a lot cheaper and we'd have a much more complete charging station network. They can do it, they just didn't.
  
  Like
- Sportyaccordy on Dec 18, 2018
  
  @nels0300 Well manufacturers are focusing on them now. It takes time.
  
  Like
- Tummy on Dec 18, 2018
  
  @nels0300 Re: Nels0300 "I want my next car to be electric, but they’re going to have to get cheaper than they are now. Let me know when there is something equivalent to my 2017 Elantra Sport for $20K, but with an electric drivetrain, and I’m there." Hyundai Ioniq EV starts at $29k. There is at least a $7,500 federal tax incentive and up to $5,000 state incentives depending where you live. Hyundai Kona EV starts around $36k before incentives with about 250 miles of range. They are also coming out with the Niro and it will have about 300 miles of range for a similar price in 2019. There are many videos on youtube reviewing these cars.
  
  Like
- Whatnext on Dec 18, 2018
  
  @nels0300 Yup, and without all those moving pats they should be a lot more reliable and require a lot less servicing.
  
  Like
- Mcs on Dec 18, 2018
  
  @sportyaccordy: Check out this EV. Who knows if it will actually make to production, but damn, this one is a stunner: https://electrek.co/2018/12/14/mustang-tesla-aviar-motors-electric-muscle-car/
  
  Like
- Nels0300 on Dec 18, 2018
  
  @Tummy $36K, $29K, that's still quite a bit more than comparable gas engine equipped cars, and it's only because of the tax credits that they're remotely close in price. Give me something Elantra sized, not subcompact, full EV, for ~$25K *before* any subsidies. I know, I'll probably be waiting a while.
  
  Like
- Tummy on Dec 19, 2018
  
  @nels0300 The Ioniq sits on the same 106.3-inch wheelbase as the Elantra and and shares a good portion of the Elantra's chassis componentry. I would say it's practically the same car. The average selling price of new cars $36k now. Full size pickup average is $48k. So there is little incentive for manufacturers to make $20k cars. It always takes about 10 years before any new technology trickles down into regular cars. Leaf and Tesla Model S came out around 2011/2012 so we're looking at only a few more years. Full EV will probably be a bit longer than 10 years since it's such a change, but we're getting there.
  
  Like
Nels0300 on Dec 18, 2018

Seriously, a guy who smokes joints on podcasts and can't control himself on Twitter started an EV car company from scratch, and is now challenging companies who literally had a HUNDRED YEAR head start. GM, Ford, VW, Toyota, etc. have NO EXCUSE. Imagine VW, with basically unlimited resources compared to Tesla, had started their EV initiative 15 years ago instead of being bogged down by their idiotic clean diesel shit storm.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.