Subaru Crosstrek Hybrid To Appear in L.A.

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

The stereotypical Subaru customer has always been overly concerned with Johnny Polar Bear, so it’s been a bit of a surprise that the company hasn’t had a plug-in hybrid offering in their lineup.

That changes next year, with the introduction of the 2019 Crosstrek Hybrid. Subaru must be employing a few wizards in the engineering department because despite the new hybrid producing less power and weighing more (a lot more), the company is claiming the electrified Crosstrek is a full second quicker to sixty than the standard car.

It’s a tough claim to figure out, at least for this decidedly non-engineering minded human. If someone else has a different take, please chime in.

Subaru says the hybrid will make a total system output of 148 horsepower, with the gasoline engine good for 137 horses and 134 lb-ft of torque, peaking at 5,600 and 4,400 rpm respectively. The electrified bits are said to contribute 118 horsepower and 148 lb-ft of twist. Its curb weight bends the earth to the tune of 3,726 lbs.

Compare those stats to the standard car, a unit which weighs as little as 3,113 lbs. Its 2.0-liter fuel-swiller makes 152 horsepower at 6,000 rpm and 145 lb-ft of torque at 4,000 rpm.

Armchair bench racers will point to the inherent ability of an electric motor to provide peak torque at almost zero rpm as the reason why the hybrid version outscoots the gas-powered car. This is certainly true, and Subaru points out in the spec sheet that the motor generators provide all 148 lb-ft of torque from rest to 1,500 rpm. Still, it’s tough to imagine such a marked improvement in acceleration given all that extra weight. We look forward to driving one and experiencing it for ourselves.

Electrification comes from a series-parallel plug-in hybrid system combining gasoline engine and two electric motor generators. The 2.0-L boxer-four remains on board, as does the Lineartronic CVT which integrates the motor generators in this application.The hybrid battery is a 8.8-kWh lithium-ion unit that can be fully charged in a couple of hours using a 240v power source. It’ll take five hours from a standard plug.

Digging into the spec sheet reveals the hybrid has larger rear brake discs than the standard car, 11.2-inch vented units vs 10.8-inch solids, perhaps to handle the extra 500 lbs of largesse. Ground clearance is the same (a remarkable 8.7 inches, the Suburban only has 7.9) but approach and departure angles are slightly affected if you care about that sort of thing. Notably, cargo volume shrink from 20.8 cubic feet to just 16.9 cubes.

Priced at $34,995 plus $975 for destination and delivery, the 2019 Crosstrek Hybrid will arrive at dealers later this year.

Images: [Subaru]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 9 comments
  • Scoutdude Scoutdude on Nov 20, 2018

    The acceleration difference, if it indeed is as they claim in this press release is due to the difference in the area under the curve in engineering speak. Peaks typically don't mean that much though a CVT does increase their importance. Because their peak outputs don't align you get a bit of a double hump curve that has more area under it that the single peak you get out of an ICE by itself. The battery pack's max safe discharge rate also comes into play. The fact that they say that the electric motor has the same torque from 0-1500 rpm indicates that they are limiting the current to the motor until the rpm is high enough that enough back EMF is generated to limit the current.

  • Detroit-Iron Detroit-Iron on Nov 22, 2018

    "The stereotypical Subaru customer has always been overly concerned with Johnny Polar Bear, " Maybe concerned with appearing to care. Until very recently Scoobie mileage was atrocious.

    • HotPotato HotPotato on Nov 24, 2018

      Scoobies get crap mileage compared to other small cars. They get great mileage compared to traditionally available AWD vehicles. So if you're eco-minded but Snowbelt-bound, a Scoobie traditionally was seen as a green but practical choice. That probably doesn't hold up so well now that everyone and their brother has a compact AWD CUV to sell, some of them with hybrid drive, hence this new model.

  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
Next