QOTD: Would Hummer Sell Today?

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Here’s the thing: as readers and writers – and not CEOs held responsible for a raft of employees and shareholders – we can play armchair quarterback about product planning to our heart’s content.

Jeep is currently in the throes of selling their wares with the speed of proverbial hotcakes. Responding in kind is Ford, who is seemingly on the cusp of introducing a couple of Bronco rigs as Wrangler and Renegade fighters. Here’s the question for you – would GM make bank if they brought back Hummer?

In case anyone around here has a very short memory, let’s hold a quick history lesson. Hummer began marketing vehicle all the way back in 1992, when it foisted a civilian version of the military Humvee on the American public. The effort was helped along by Hollywood elite and White House Plumbers alike.

Later, GM bought the joint, proceeding to produce H2 and H3 machines based on other General Motors trucks and SUVs. Sadly, it became a pariah for the tree-hugging crowd, a popular punching bag for the argument we were all using too much of the world’s fuel. This, and the economic downturn, led to whispers in Ren Cen about the possibility of binning the brand. GM’s embarrassing sojourn through bankruptcy took care of the rest after a search for a buyer turned up empty.

By the way, it annoys me to no end when GM and its brands tout themselves as “celebrating 100 years” or whatever. Technically, they’re not even a decade old. The current General Motors Company is legally distinct from the original General Motors Corporation founded in 1908. The old GM is now called Motors Liquidation Company and hasn’t made a car since 2009. Anyway.

Big, square brutes are now firmly in vogue, as evidenced by Jeep who’s breaking its own records month after month. Ford will likely do well with their new Bronco and its variants. If GM were to bring back Hummer, marketing three or four SUVs and crossovers plus a midsize pickup with modern powertrains and technologies, they’d probably find themselves with a very popular brand.

Agreed? Or am I completely off the mark?

[Image: Wikipedia]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 85 comments
  • Hummer Hummer on Nov 19, 2018

    Lot of people have no idea on the bones of the H2 I can see from the comments, similarly many should drive a vehicle before giving it a rash. My H2s are the best long distance travelers Ive been able to find, and resale value has been fantastic. The H2s and H3s are plenty capable off-road. My vote; please dear God do not bring back the brand, lest it become a Jeep clone and start building faux off-road vehicles.

    • See 1 previous
    • Hummer Hummer on Nov 20, 2018

      @Lie2me With tears in my eyes I would vote "No" on a ressurection. I absolutely love every vehicle the Hummer brand produced but in today's world the brand would be turned into the travesty that Jeep has become. I never want to see that happen so I would rather live without a new truck and soldier my old trucks on than see crossovers with the Hummer brand affixed.

  • Ttacgreg Ttacgreg on Nov 19, 2018

    I have gotten this far into the comments and, no comments yet from Hummer????? I do recall that the H2 owners' main gripe about H2 was, wait for it, crappy fuel economy. Big duh, buy a massive vehicle as aerodynamic as a brick, with likely the largest frontal area on a "light" truck and expect decent MPG? Current cafe standards, maybe even the proposed new more permissive efficiency standards would rule the H2 out.

    • See 4 previous
    • Erikstrawn Erikstrawn on Nov 21, 2018

      @Hummer I can guarantee you a Suburban drives just fine while loaded for bear and hauling a trailer. I don't need full-time 4WD, but being able to select it while driving down a snowy road works just fine. The 6.0 I understand, but that's available on a standard Chevy truck. You sound like you actually off-road yours, and I get it, but I don't think I've ever seen a Hummer splattered in mud. I'd guess 95% of them are bought for show.

  • MaintenanceCosts In Toyota's hands, these hybrid powertrains with a single motor and a conventional automatic transmission have not been achieving the same kind of fuel economy benefits as the planetary-gear setups in the smaller cars. It's too bad. Many years ago GM did a group of full-size pickups and SUVs with a 6.0L V8 and a two-motor planetary gear system, and those got the fuel economy boost you'd expect while maintaining big-time towing capacity. Toyota should have done the same with its turbo four and six in the new trucks.
  • JMII My C7 isn't too bad maintain wise but it requires 10 quarts of expensive 0W-40 once a year (per GM) and tires are pricey due size and grip requirements. I average about $600 a year in maintenance but a majority of that is due to track usage. Brake fluid, brake pads and tires add up quickly. Wiper blades, coolant flush, transmission fluid, rear diff fluid and a new battery were the other costs. I bought the car in 2018 with 18k in mileage and now it has 42k. Many of the items mentioned are needed between 20k and 40k per GM's service schedule so my ownership period just happens to align with various intervals.I really need to go thru my service spreadsheet and put track related items on a separate tab to get a better picture of what "normal" cost would be. Its likely 75% of my spend is track related.Repairs to date are only $350. I needed a new XM antenna (aftermarket), a cargo net clip, a backup lamp switch and new LED side markers (aftermarket). The LEDs were the most expensive at $220.
  • Slavuta I drove it but previous style. Its big, with numb steering feel, and transmission that takes away from whatever the engine has.
  • Wjtinfwb Rivaled only by the Prowler and Thunderbird as retro vehicles that missed the mark... by a mile.
  • Wjtinfwb Tennessee is a Right to Work state. The UAW will have a bit less leverage there than in Michigan, which repealed R t W a couple years ago. And how much leverage will the UAW really have in Chattanooga. That plant builds ID. 4 and Atlas, neither of which are setting the world afire, sales wise. I'd have thought VW would have learned the UAW plays by different rules than the placid German unions from the Westmoreland PA debacle. But history has shown VW to be exceptionally slow learners. Watching with interest.
Next