2020 Genesis G90: Korea's Flagship Tries a Bolder Look

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Representing a good value among the premium full-size sedan set, the Genesis G90 remains thin on the ground — and not just because of America’s fondness for crossovers and SUVs. As it begins its roll-out of standalone Genesis stores, the fledgling brand planned to kick off the new dealer strategy by fielding only 2019 model-year vehicles. That meant a sell-down of existing stock throughout the summer and fall.

For the 2020 model year, the second model launched by Hyundai’s luxury division, the G90, undergoes a significant refresh, though the marque’s future hinges on a trio of yet-to-be-seen crossovers.

Unveiled today in Seoul, the second-generation G90 dons a new face and taillights, with its grille now sweeping south to touch the bumper’s lower lip. A little Acura-esque, in this writer’s view. Headlights are now bisected, a la Volvo, and a newly carved fender port carries on this motif.

Out back, the previous model’s staid, vertically oriented taillights transform into two decks of LEDs, splayed out horizontally across the rear fascia and trunklid. Character lines and formal roofline carry over unchanged. Two additional changes can be found in the extra hood creases and the “Genesis” lettering replacing the brand’s logo on the trunk.

The 19-inch lace alloy wheels seen above are optional units meant to mimic the light reflected by a cut gemstone, Genesis tells us. Inside, things remain pretty much the same, though a new interface for the 12.3-inch touchscreen allows users to zoom in and out.

What Genesis doesn’t tell us is what to expect under the hood. The previous U.S.-spec model saw a 5.0-liter V8 and twin-turbo 3.3-liter V6 paired with an eight-speed automatic, in either rear- or all-wheel-drive guise. It’s hard to imagine the top-flight motor disappearing. That tranny, it should be noted, was exceptionally smooth, as was the model’s Adaptive Control Suspension. Sound insulation was also top notch.

That said, it’s a difficult feat to enter a pricey segment as a new brand and sell cars, even if quality is up to snuff. Between the G90’s launch in September 2016 and the end of October 2018, just 7,269 examples found U.S. buyers. Last month’s tally amounted to 104 vehicles.

[Images: Genesis Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 30 comments
  • Thegamper Thegamper on Nov 27, 2018

    Reminds me quite a bit of the Chrysler Imperial Concept from not too long ago. Good looking.

  • Jaeger Jaeger on Nov 28, 2018

    Genesis owner here. Love this look, and props for a very comprehensive restyle for what is basically a midcycle refresh. The G90 has lost some of its staid blandness for a more edgy, contemporary look. That's a good thing. The fake fender vents - those are not a good thing.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next