ZF's New Camera System Focuses on an Oft-ignored Danger: the Driver

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The rollout of semi-autonomous driver assist systems designed to turn long highway slogs into stress-free, breezy jaunts isn’t in any way perfected, but OEMs and suppliers are working on it. Depending on who builds what, lane-holding can be dodgy, automatic braking can be capricious, forward-facing cameras and radar can misidentify or ignore objects, and drivers can easily be put on too long a leash, encouraging misuse.

It’s the latter issue that automotive supplier ZF wants to solve with its new interior camera system.

Currently, few vehicles with a true hands-off highway autocruise feature (for lack of a better description) pay much attention to what the driver’s doing. After a certain period without sensing a touch or a hold on the steering wheel, these systems will flash lights or sound alarms in order to grab the driver’s attention. However, a minimal amount of response sends those safety nannies packing.

Cadillac’s Super Cruise is relatively unique in that a FOVIO driver monitoring system sourced from Seeing Machines monitors the driver’s eyes, keeping track on the level of attention they’re paying to the road ahead.

With ZF’s system, the cameras map the interior of the car and each of its occupants, painting a 3-D picture of the cabin. The interior observation system (IOS) judges not just the driver’s eyes, but their posture, too, determining whether they’re able to retake the wheel and respond to an oncoming danger in a certain amount of time. Other occupants also fall under the system’s gaze. This could prove useful when it comes time to deploy — or not deploy, based on posture — the vehicle’s airbags or seatbelt pretensioners.

A child left accidentally in a parked vehicle would be picked up by the IOS’s camera, with the car taking steps to alert the parents, the authorities, or just lower the windows. Safety doesn’t end after the car’s been placed in park and the engine shut off.

It’s generally agreed that no vehicle with a certain level of self-driving capability can truly be deemed “safe” without a camera trained on the driver. With nearly all automakers chasing greater levels of autonomous control, systems like this will be in high demand. ZF’s setup isn’t available yet, however. The supplier hopes to have it ready for production by late 2021.

[Source: Wards Auto] [Image: Tesla]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 5 comments
  • TMA1 TMA1 on Oct 23, 2018

    I'm sure this will be mandatory in all vehicles in a few years. Just like backup cameras and the upcoming autonomous braking mandate.

  • TimK TimK on Oct 23, 2018

    And an insurance company would never use these data to deny claims or assign fault, would it?

    • Cognoscenti Cognoscenti on Oct 24, 2018

      "And an insurance company would never use these data to deny claims or assign fault, would it?" Classic! =:)

  • Ronin The very asking of the question "Are Plug-In Hybrids the Future?" is an interesting one. Because just 2 or 3 years ago we'd be asking- no, asserting- that E cars are the future. We're no longer asking that question.
  • Peter Benn There apparently were some K-code 4-dr sedan Fairlanes. Collectible Automobile Apr 2024 has found a '63 500 with HD 3/spd.
  • Mia Hey there!I recently stumbled upon the Crack Eraser DIY Windshield Repair Kit (check it out here: https://crackeraser.com/collections/diy-windshield-repair-kits) and decided to give it a shot on a small chip in my windshield. I have to say, it worked like a charm! Super easy to use, and it saved me a trip to the professionals. If you're dealing with a similar issue, this kit is definitely worth considering. 😊
  • Rust-MyEnemy Whoa, what the hell is wrong with Jalop1991 and his condescension? It's as if he's employed by Big Plug-In or something."I've seen plenty of your types on the forums....."Dunno what that means, but I'm not dead keen on being regarded as "A type" by a complete stranger"" I'm guessing you've never actually calculated by hand the miles you've driven against the quantity of gas used--which is your actual miles per gallon."Guess again. Why the hell would you even say that? Yes, I worked it out. Fill-to-fill, based on gas station receipts. And it showed me that a Vauxhall Astra PHEV, starting out with a fully charged PHEV battery, in Hybrid mode, on my long (234-mile) daily motorway daily commute, never, over several months, ever matched or beat the economy of the regular hybrid Honda Civic that I ran for a similar amount of time (circa 5000 miles)."You don't use gasoline at all for 30-40 miles as you use exclusively battery power, then your vehicle is a pure hybrid. Over 234 miles, you will have used whatever gas the engine used for 200 of those miles."At least you're right on that. In hybrid mode, though, the Astra was using battery power when it wasn't at all appropriate. The petrol engine very rarely chimed in when battery power was on tap, and as a result, the EV-mode range quickly disappeared. The regular hybrid Civic, though, deployed its very small electric reserves (which are used up quickly but restore themselves promptly), much more wisely. Such as when on a trailing throttle or on a downward grade, or when in stop-start traffic. As a result, at the end of my 234 miles, the Civic had used less gas than the Astra. Moreover, I hadn't had to pay for the electricity in its battery.I look forward to you arguing that what actually happened isn't what actually happened, but I was there and you were not."Regardless, that you don't understand it appears not to have stopped you from pontificating on it. Please, do us all a favor--don't vote."You really are quite unpleasant, aren't you. But thanks for the advice.
  • Tassos Jong-iL Electric vehicles are mandated by 2020 in One Korea. We are ahead of the time.
Next