Car, Parts Companies Exhale, but Not Everyone's Thrilled by USMCA
Canada’s autoworkers feel pretty confident they’ll still have a job next year, as the free trade agreement reached by the U.S. and its northern neighbor Sunday night pretty much keeps the status quo alive in that country’s auto sector.
Just last week, with headway essentially absent from the trade negotiations, President Trump repeated his threat of levying a 25 percent import tax on Canadian vehicles. Such a tariff could easily have seen 160,000 jobs erased from the auto and parts manufacturing industries; perhaps more.
However, just because the industry came out all right in the end doesn’t mean the future is entirely rosy.
Tariffs remain on steel and aluminum imported into the U.S., including from Canada. Apparently, getting rid of those is a battle to be waged some other day. Trump claims the tariffs (25 percent on steel, 10 percent on aluminum) might be replaced at a later date by import quotas.
Still, Canada’s leadership and the president of its autoworkers union seem pleased, perhaps more so the latter individual. Bloomberg reports that Canadian auto parts suppliers, among them Magna International, saw some wind finally enter their slack sails today. Most are trading upwards. It helps that the country now finds itself bound by new content rules, with the NAFTA rule of 62.5 percent regional content now upped to 75 percent.
In the agreement, tariff exemptions were placed on 2.6 million Canadian-built vehicles exported to the U.S., which shouldn’t pose a problem. The country currently exports about 1.8 million vehicles per year from plants belonging to Honda, Toyota, and the Detroit Three automakers. Actually, it’s because Canada isn’t likely to ever top that number that has some feeling bummed about the country’s long-term auto health.
According to the Center for Automotive Research, Canadian vehicle production are expected to drop by 135,000 vehicles in the 2016-2020 period. In Mexico, still a lower wage jurisdiction despite stricter wage rules contained in USMCA, it’s the opposite. The country is expected to crank out an extra 850,000 vehicles in that time frame.
Nothing in the trilateral agreement changes the fact that it’s pricier to build cars in Canada. Keep in mind that the country at one time housed a Studebaker factory.
“There’s nothing in here that lowers costs for any of the three countries so compared with the rest of the world, all three countries are probably made slightly less competitive over the longer term,” Brett House, deputy chief economist at Bank of Nova Scotia, told Bloomberg. Dennis DesRosiers of DesRosiers Automotive Consulting called the agreement “a lot of theatre with “very little substance.” He added that higher regional content means added costs for all automakers producing in North America, which could hurt efficiency.
The Southern U.S. is frequently singled out as the jurisdiction with the most to gain from the new agreement, which is exactly what Trump was aiming for. Still, leaders from all three nations walked away claiming a win.
[Image: Ford Motor Company]
More by Steph Willems
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- El scotto The badging and nothing else will probably run another 10K. How many of these 60th Anniversary badges will be available at the parts counter? Thinking of Barret-Jackson/Mecum in 30 years
- Scott Automatic braking scares me. I have had the Object Ahead!!! warning-light come on because the pavement ahead changed color. (ie concrete to asphalt or such) If the car had auto-braking it would have been four wheel lockup (except for the antilock)
- Cardave5150 Wow, that front end is an absolute mess in Wimbledon White.
- Scott Sub-headline, "FORD finds Another Way to Tell Me How Old I Am".60th Anniversary,,,, 60th!!
- Ajla I'll admit I am psychologically attached to having an engine. That's obviously a major hurdle for me when it comes to EVs. Beyond cost, range, charging and other things folks have mentioned.
Comments
Join the conversation
Hunmira brought in $18 billion for Abbvie in 2017? Really? I'd like to see where you got that number. I happen to be a long time Abbvie stock holder and a biotech investor. In 2017 Abbvie's net income was a little over $5 billion, 65% of which came from Humira. "...most usable drugs are invented in labs that are sponsored by the federal government." Citation for this? It's false.
This is all about Chinese parts. Billions in Chinese car parts are used in NA vehicle production. The new rules are intended to restrict that.