By on September 6, 2018

2018 Ford F-150 , Image: Ford

As far as safety recalls go, this one’s pretty sizeable, and it impacts a company that’s seen a lot of money lost on safety recalls in recent years. Ford Motor Company has announced the recall of nearly two million examples of the world’s best-selling vehicle to prevent the seemingly unlikely occurrence of seatbelt-related blazes.

The recall, affecting 1,995,776 trucks in North America — 1,619,112 of them in the United States, is the result of 17 documented fires or reports of smoke in 2015-2018 model year F-150 regular cabs or SuperCrew models sold stateside. Another six incidents took place in Canada.

The fires originated inside the vehicles’ B-pillar, with the seatbelt pretensioner as the source of the issue. While the life-saving device works properly to restrain the front-seat driver and passenger in the event of a crash, it’s what occurs after the device’s deployment that has Ford worried.

According to the automaker, the problem lies in the combination of three factors: the “excessive sparks” generated when the seatbelt pretensioners deploy, the exhaust gasses emitted by the device, and the close proximity of insulation within the B-pillar.

When a pretensioner activates, an electrode ignited a combustible gas at the bottom of a cylinder, pushing a piston upwards. A rack gear connected to the piston engages a gear attached to the seatbelt retractor spool during this upward motion, retracting the seatbelt so that it hugs the occupant tightly against the seat. The device exhausts the gasses generated by the combustion at the same time.

“When sufficient sparks are present, gases exhausted inside the lower portion of the B-pillar by the pretensioners may ignite,” Ford stated. “If this gas ignites, components behind the B-pillar such as insulation and carpet may subsequently catch fire.”

Documents sent to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration show a lengthy investigation occuring as incident reports piled up. Ford’s Critical Concern Review Group first began investigating after post-collision fires broke out in the B-pillar of four 2015 and 2016 F-150s between April and October of 2017. Despite an analysis of the vehicles, plus subsystem testing, Ford couldn’t come up with a cause.

Further fire reports soon came to the automaker’s attention, with Transport Canada becoming involved in November 2017 after a fire occured on its soil. A joint inspection of that F-150 failed to reveal an ignition source. Ford did, however, determine that the insulation and carpeting used met its own standards. It wasn’t until August, two months after the NHTSA contacted the company with concerns, that the group ID’d the cause.

“A comprehensive series of vehicle level tests was performed. During these tests, Ford observed interaction between pretensioner deployment sparks and exhaust gasses, resulting in momentary combustion, and in some cases, igniting material in the B-pillar area,” Ford wrote in the NHTSA document. “Testing confirmed this potential on both 2015-2017 and 2018 model year systems.”

A field action was approved on August 24th. It’s a simple fix — Ford plans to “remove the B-pillar insulation material and wiring harness tape, and install heat resistant tape.” Owners of regular cab models will see the dealer modify the back interior panel of their pickup cabs.

The recall (#18S27), which is free of charge, is expected to begin on September 24th.

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

14 Comments on “Seatbelt-related Fires Spark Recall of Two Million Ford F-150s...”


  • avatar
    wayneoh

    Your prayers have been answered…………If only they hadn’t sold so many of those darn junk F150’s.

  • avatar
    APaGttH

    Ford loves their fire related recalls.

  • avatar
    cicero1

    pffftt, small chance of fire in the B pillar; amateurs,

    /s/ BMW South Korea sales team

  • avatar
    thelaine

    So, what we got here is one’a them “good news, bad news” scenarios.

  • avatar
    gasser

    Another month, another massive Ford recall. I am surprised that the dealers have time for routine service with all the recall warranty work.

  • avatar
    raph

    Damn it’s bad when you dont even need to open the link and you already know who it is…

    Did Mullally really screw up the company this bad or did he just straighten it enough to get that last big check or did it just fall to pieces after he left.

    Gonna be a tough pill to swallow for all the Mustang guys out there that made fun of the Camaro crowd when the Camaro went on hiatus after Ford goes tits up.

    It will be hysterical if GM celebrates 60 years of Camaro and Mustang just a bottle of salty tears at 60.

    Christ Ford get your head out of your ass and get it together or just sell the farm and quit taking up space more competent companies can make money in.

  • avatar
    SCE to AUX

    Given that pretensioners fire just before a crash, I’m surprised there haven’t been injuries or even deaths associated with this issue. Nothing like being trapped in your crashed truck with the seat belt spool on fire.

    Also, I’m dubious of their fix using heat-resistant tape. It doesn’t seem to match the stated sequence of events in the fire scenario.

  • avatar
    Dilrod

    I can hear the old “I’d rather be thrown clear in an accident” crowd chuckling.

  • avatar
    Sub-600

    Ford must have killed more men than Cecil B. DeMille. Can you still get a F-150 with the blazing saddle interior?

  • avatar
    Gardiner Westbound

    Regulators seem to have lost the plot:

    a) GDI engines that require extraordinary maintenance to regain fuel mileage and emissions compliance,
    b) Turbocharged engines that generate high MPG numbers in gentle laboratory testing but not in real world driving,
    c) Gazillion-speed transmissions that cost a king’s ransom to rebuild post warranty, likely resulting in early scrappage,
    d) Exploding airbag inflators have killed over a dozen occupants and caused countless injuries,
    e) ABS brakes that theoretically allow one to steer around danger while braking. How many know this? How many have the sphincter control to manage it in an emergency?
    f) And now, seat belt tensioners that can fricassee crash survivors!

  • avatar
    megaphone

    Another fine bit of engineering by Ford. Remember the Pinto anyone?


Recent Comments

  • ToddAtlasF1: The GMs are garish and tacky. This school bus just looks uncomfortable in its skin. My first thought was...
  • rpn453: I go with GM. In my experience, they were more responsive and less slushy than the Chrysler and Ford...
  • Lou_BC: On the other thread @cdotson had a great explanation for “gutters” being used to conceal body...
  • Lou_BC: It looks much better than the Denali or Escalade.
  • Lou_BC: “where he’s overseeing a massive growth in Ram sales” Both on a Roid RamPage?

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributors

  • Timothy Cain, Canada
  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States