Sacked: Dealerships Owned By Former NFL Linebackers Face Legal Action

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

The financial chicanery of a few automotive dealerships continues apace, with a group of Nissan and Hyundai stores finding themselves in several million dollars’ worth of hot water.

Reps for the captive finance arms of those two brands allege that five dealerships owned by auto retail veteran Michael Saporito and former NFL linebackers Jessie Armstead and Antonio Pierce sold nearly $10.5 million worth of vehicles out of trust. Nearly a hundred machines are allegedly missing, as well.

According to Automotive News, someone suspected something was amiss back in July, when audits carried out by Hyundai Capital America came up with discrepancies between the group’s Hazleton Hyundai and Hazleton Kia locations. Not long after this brouhaha, reps from Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. turned their sights on related Nissan dealerships in Michigan, allegedly identifying more than 400 vehicles that had been financed but could not be located. Last month, lawsuits filed in two separate states purport that Nissan Finance is owed nearly $10 million for vehicles sold out of trust.

In case you missed it last time, here’s a quick course in dealership terminology. For purposes of this post, “out of trust” refers the sale of a car that has been paid for with a loan, but the sale proceeds have not been used to pay back the lender. This creates an unsecured debt the dealer then owes to the finance company.

On July 30, an employee of Data Scan Technologies, hired by Hyundai’s captive finance arm, performed an audit at the Hyundai and Kia stores, identifying 45 Hyundais and 41 Kias — many of which were titled to Hazleton Honda or Hazleton Nissan, according to a verification filing. This is not kosher, as it is said to violate the loan agreements with Hyundai Capital.

If these other stores then granted their brand’s captive finance arms a security interest in the vehicles, that would compound the problem. Folks don’t like it when a person double dips their tortilla chips, let alone floorplan financing. Repayments to the finance companies are reported to also have been missed. Car carriers appeared at a few of the dealer lots and whisked away inventory.

The Nissan dealers in Michigan wrapped up in this debacle currently appear to be in a bit of the shambles. Automotive News reports one of their reporters was told by a person at the store in Dearborn that the place was open but unable to sell or lease vehicles due to “restructuring.” That’s grim. The industry publication went on to say, “On Thursday, Sept. 6, a service department employee at the Dearborn store said all the technicians had left to take jobs with other Nissan dealerships.” Yikes.

Talking heads are speculating the stores aren’t currently dark, thanks to feverish attempts on the part of Nissan to find new owners. Whatever the outcome, the mass exodus of staff will prove a challenge for whoever decides to try and rebuild the place, not to mention the public relations nightmare now associated with those locations. Nissan recently put on a push to increase its market share in the Detroit Three’s playground, with this dealer group being a large piece of that puzzle after All Pro Nissan opened up locations in Dearborn and Macomb about three years ago.

Your author always feels badly for dealer employees who did not create the problem, yet get caught up with — and have their lives affected by — these types of alleged backroom shenanigans. Here’s hoping they all land on their feet.

[Image: All Pro Nissan of Dearborn]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 40 comments
  • CKNSLS Sierra SLT CKNSLS Sierra SLT on Sep 10, 2018

    Just traded in my 2012 GMC Sierra on a new 2018 Crew Cab Silverado LTZ. Ultra clean-ultra low miles. Family run dealership. They offered me $21,000.00 for it which was LOW Bluebook. My sources said $26,000.00 was right in the middle of where it should been. After I countered their $21,000 trade in with $26,000.00 it took them a full half-hour to offer me $25,00.00 which I accepted. I really don't know what took so long-for information I looked up on the Internet in 10 minutes. Other than that-it was a pretty straight forward deal. I hate dealerships.

  • Erikstrawn Erikstrawn on Sep 11, 2018

    "Your author always feels badly for dealer employees who did not create the problem, yet get caught up with — and have their lives affected by — these types of alleged backroom shenanigans. Here’s hoping they all land on their feet." You can make a choice where to work. When I got laid off from the dealership, I said "Forget this." and went into a different industry. The pressure to work dishonestly was worse than any place I'd worked before.

  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next