QOTD: Forget Newsletters - Which Automaker Would You Subscribe To?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems
qotd forget newsletters which automaker would you subscribe to

Newsletters, podcasts, streaming music services — our quest for consumption and thirst for variety knows no bounds. But lately, automakers have taken to experimenting with the same business model. A range of cars, plus insurance coverage, for a fixed monthly price.

Sounds intriguing, if the price is right.

Cadillac’s doing it. Bimmer, too. And so is Porsche. Volvo has such a service, but it only nets you a single compact crossover. Mercedes-Benz recently made its own foray into the subscription arena, offering a bevy of German luxury vehicles for just over a grand per month.

What would it take to lure you aboard the subscription bandwagon?

Maybe it isn’t the business model or the price — it’s the automaker. Cadillacs and Teutonic barges from east of the Rhine are nice, but perhaps not your cup of automotive tea. No, you’re thinking of something more practical, something with the widest variety of roadgoing appliances.

It’s hard not to think of an OEM-wide subscription service offered by Fiat Chrysler, General Motors, or Ford. Swapping back and forth between loaded luxo pickups and muscle cars, with SUVs rounding out the fare, seems like a great idea for the consumer, but maybe not for the company. OEMs like racking up sales of high-margin vehicles. And neither Ford nor Chevrolet nor Ram have much trouble offloading full-size pickups.

To tempt the American consumer, OEMs would need to think long and hard about that subscription price. Book by Cadillac is still unprofitable. BMW’s subscription service just cut back its entry price. Everyone’s starting out small and making baby steps towards a wider roll-out, fearful of losing money and looking like a failure.

Still, we can be assured of more subscription services popping up in the future. Your task today is to describe the automotive subscription service you’d like to see, then come up with the fair and reasonable price you’d be willing to pay.

Have at it.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Join the conversation
2 of 33 comments
  • Lockstops Lockstops on Aug 03, 2018

    I'd like a Ferrari subscription service: 10 months of the year I'd have a Fiat 595 Tributo Ferrari and a Ferrari cap, jacket, pen and some stickers. And then for 2 months I'd have a 488 GTB. If it wasn't owned by the antichrist VW Group, I'd maybe also like to subscribe to the Porsche package: one month I could drive a 911, the next month I could have a nice kitchen, then the next month I could have an apartment in Miami and a pen, sunglasses, an umbrella and golf set.

  • Greg Greg on Aug 03, 2018

    Subscriptions work well with one-off or intangible items like the three examples at the start of the article. Not so sure how well it would work with a pool of high-maintenance durable goods like cars. I would hazard a guess that commenters on TTAC take better care of cars than most people. It’s not about hooning a hellcat as much as hoping the previous subscriber knew to drive with the parking brake off. I just completed an extended rental period with a crowd-sourced internet car rental service. Not exactly a subscription plan, but I had a few weeks with a premium car that was not a typical car rental option. Cosmetically, the car was fine, but a lot of deferred maintenance started to reveal itself. The car had over 50k miles, which made me reconsider that I’ve never had a national chain car rental with over 10k on the clock. Anyone know at what mileage rental agencies pull cars out of circulation? The car subscription model sounds like a loser for manufacturers. If you take traditional owners out of the equation, who pays for maintenance?

  • Bd2 Other way around.Giorgetto Giugiaro penned the Pony Coupe during the early 1970s and later used its wedge shape as the basis for the M1 and then the DMC-12.The 3G Supra was just one of many Japanese coupes to adopt the wedge shape (actually was one of the later ones).The Mitsubishi Starion, Nissan 300ZX, etc.
  • Tassos I also want one of the idiots who support the ban to explain to me how it will work.Suppose sometime (2035 or later) you cannot buy a new ICE vehicle in the UK.Q1: Will this lead to a ICE fleet resembling that of CUBA, with 100 year old '56 Chevys eventually? (in that case, just calculate the horrible extra pollution due to keeping 100 year old cars on the road)Q2: Will people be able to buy PARTS for their old cars FOREVER?Q3: Will people be allowed to jump across the Channel and buy a nice ICE in France, Germany (who makes the best cars anyway), or any place else that still sells them, and then use it in the UK?
  • Tassos Bans are ridiculous and undemocratic and smell of Middle Ages and the Inquisition. Even 2035 is hardly any better than 2030.The ALMIGHTY CONSUMER should decide, not... CARB, preferably WITHOUT the Government messing with the playing field.And if the usual clueless idiots read this and offer the tired "But Government subsidizes the oil industry too", will they EVER learn that those MINISCULE (compared to the TRILLIONS of $ size of this industry) subsidies were designed to help the SMALL Oil producers defend themselves against the "Big Oil" multinationals. Ask ANY major Oil co CEO and he will gladly tell you that you can take those tiny subsidies and shove them.
  • Dusterdude The suppliers can ask for concessions, but I wouldn’t hold my breath . With the UAW they are ultimately bound to negotiate with them. However, with suppliers , they could always find another supplier ( which in some cases would be difficult, but not impossible)
  • AMcA Phoenix. Awful. The roads are huge and wide, with dedicated lanes for turning, always. Requires no attention to what you're doing. The roads are idiot proofed, so all the idiots drive - they have no choice, because everything is so spread out.