QOTD: Forget Newsletters - Which Automaker Would You Subscribe To?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Newsletters, podcasts, streaming music services — our quest for consumption and thirst for variety knows no bounds. But lately, automakers have taken to experimenting with the same business model. A range of cars, plus insurance coverage, for a fixed monthly price.

Sounds intriguing, if the price is right.

Cadillac’s doing it. Bimmer, too. And so is Porsche. Volvo has such a service, but it only nets you a single compact crossover. Mercedes-Benz recently made its own foray into the subscription arena, offering a bevy of German luxury vehicles for just over a grand per month.

What would it take to lure you aboard the subscription bandwagon?

Maybe it isn’t the business model or the price — it’s the automaker. Cadillacs and Teutonic barges from east of the Rhine are nice, but perhaps not your cup of automotive tea. No, you’re thinking of something more practical, something with the widest variety of roadgoing appliances.

It’s hard not to think of an OEM-wide subscription service offered by Fiat Chrysler, General Motors, or Ford. Swapping back and forth between loaded luxo pickups and muscle cars, with SUVs rounding out the fare, seems like a great idea for the consumer, but maybe not for the company. OEMs like racking up sales of high-margin vehicles. And neither Ford nor Chevrolet nor Ram have much trouble offloading full-size pickups.

To tempt the American consumer, OEMs would need to think long and hard about that subscription price. Book by Cadillac is still unprofitable. BMW’s subscription service just cut back its entry price. Everyone’s starting out small and making baby steps towards a wider roll-out, fearful of losing money and looking like a failure.

Still, we can be assured of more subscription services popping up in the future. Your task today is to describe the automotive subscription service you’d like to see, then come up with the fair and reasonable price you’d be willing to pay.

Have at it.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 33 comments
  • Lockstops Lockstops on Aug 03, 2018

    I'd like a Ferrari subscription service: 10 months of the year I'd have a Fiat 595 Tributo Ferrari and a Ferrari cap, jacket, pen and some stickers. And then for 2 months I'd have a 488 GTB. If it wasn't owned by the antichrist VW Group, I'd maybe also like to subscribe to the Porsche package: one month I could drive a 911, the next month I could have a nice kitchen, then the next month I could have an apartment in Miami and a pen, sunglasses, an umbrella and golf set.

  • Greg Greg on Aug 03, 2018

    Subscriptions work well with one-off or intangible items like the three examples at the start of the article. Not so sure how well it would work with a pool of high-maintenance durable goods like cars. I would hazard a guess that commenters on TTAC take better care of cars than most people. It’s not about hooning a hellcat as much as hoping the previous subscriber knew to drive with the parking brake off. I just completed an extended rental period with a crowd-sourced internet car rental service. Not exactly a subscription plan, but I had a few weeks with a premium car that was not a typical car rental option. Cosmetically, the car was fine, but a lot of deferred maintenance started to reveal itself. The car had over 50k miles, which made me reconsider that I’ve never had a national chain car rental with over 10k on the clock. Anyone know at what mileage rental agencies pull cars out of circulation? The car subscription model sounds like a loser for manufacturers. If you take traditional owners out of the equation, who pays for maintenance?

  • Jkross22 When I think about products that I buy that are of the highest quality or are of great value, I have no idea if they are made as a whole or in parts by unionized employees. As a customer, that's really all I care about. When I think about services I receive from unionized and non-unionized employees, it varies from C- to F levels of service. Will unionizing make the cars better or worse?
  • Namesakeone I think it's the age old conundrum: Every company (or industry) wants every other one to pay its workers well; well-paid workers make great customers. But nobody wants to pay their own workers well; that would eat into profits. So instead of what Henry Ford (the first) did over a century ago, we will have a lot of companies copying Nike in the 1980s: third-world employees (with a few highly-paid celebrity athlete endorsers) selling overpriced products to upper-middle-class Americans (with a few urban street youths willing to literally kill for that product), until there are no more upper-middle-class Americans left.
  • ToolGuy I was challenged by Tim's incisive opinion, but thankfully Jeff's multiple vanilla truisms have set me straight. Or something. 😉
  • ChristianWimmer The body kit modifications ruined it for me.
  • ToolGuy "I have my stance -- I won't prejudice the commentariat by sharing it."• Like Tim, I have my opinion and it is perfect and above reproach (as long as I keep it to myself). I would hate to share it with the world and risk having someone critique it. LOL.
Next