NAFTA No More: U.S. Reaches Deal With Mexico, Puts Pressure on Canada [Updated]

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
nafta no more u s reaches deal with mexico puts pressure on canada updated

President Donald Trump announced a trade “understanding” with Mexico on Monday — not to be confused with an official deal — that would lead to an overhaul of the North American Free Trade Agreement. Trump made the announcement from the Oval Office, with Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto listening in by speakerphone.

While it’s still too early to show up in a Lockheed S-3 Viking and tell the world “mission accomplished,” the announcement is the most overt example of progress on NAFTA we’ve seen. Interesting, considering it seemed as if Trump was openly calling for its death during the meeting.

Earlier in the day, Mexican officials said trade talks with the U.S. had concluded, adding that an announcement could come later in the day. The White House confirmed the reports an hour later on its government website, with Donald Trump stating there was a “big deal looking good with Mexico” via twitter.

Negotiators from the United States and Mexico have worked for weeks to resolve differences on numerous contentious issues while Canada waits in the wings. Among the biggest issues for Mexico are the rules of origin, which dictate that a certain percentage of every automobile must be built from parts that originated from countries within the NAFTA region to avoid tariffs. The U.S. wants to get that percentage up, while Mexico has taken a hard stance against it. The Trump administration also pushed for the inclusion of a sunset provision, under which the revised NAFTA agreement would expire after five years unless all three countries take steps to extend it. Both Canada and Mexico turned their nose up at the idea.

It’s assumed those issues and a handful of others served as sticking points that frequently stalled meaningful discussion on other aspects of trade. However, Mexican Economy Minister Ildefonso Guajardo Villarreal said Monday that the nations have “continued making progress,” and would eventually reach some kind of agreement. He expects Canada to return to the table soon.

“Once the bilateral issues get resolved, Canada will be joining the talks to work on both bilateral issues and our trilateral issues,” Chrystia Freeland, Canada’s foreign minister, said Friday. “And will be happy to do that, once the bilateral US-Mexico issues have been resolved.”

“Big day for trade. Big day for our country,” Trump said in the opening moments of the hastily assembled announcement before handing the floor over to the Mexican president.

“[We would like to] celebrate the understand we’ve had between both negotiating teams on NAFTA,” said Peña Nieto over the phone before announcing his pleasure that Canada could now rejoin the debate.

Trump seemed less interested in a multilateral deal that included Canada, saying he would contact Prime Minister Justin Trudeau shortly, but noted that he would be happy to establish a separate deal and abandon the NAFTA name, due to negative connotations — calling the current understanding the “United States-Mexico Trade Agreement.”

Specifics on the deal are practically nonexistent, however. Likely referring to the automotive industry, the president said it would be especially great for the manufacturing sector, but gave no details. Future (more formal) announcements are planned. But the president’s statement from the Oval Office seemed targeted at letting American’s know a deal had been reached with Mexico, signatures were forthcoming, and that the trade ball was now in Canada’s court.

Update: Later in the day, details emerged about some of the agreed-upon issues. The new arrangement stipulates that U.S. and Mexico-based, car companies would be required to manufacturer at least 75 percent of an automobile’s total value within North America. The existing rules require 62.5 percent. It was also said that a certain proportion of the vehicles will have to be built by workers earning at least $16 an hour in both countries. Mexican-based companies that don’t adhere to the new regulations would be subjected to a 2.5 percent tariff when exporting to the U.S.

Trump also said he would consider upping tariffs on Canadian automobiles in response to its high dairy taxes, saying it would be the easiest way to hammer out a deal. But he was more than willing to have talks that would result in a mutually beneficial agreement. “We are looking at helping our neighbors too,” he said. “If we can help our neighbors that’s a good thing, not a a bad thing.”

[Image: NAFTA Secretariat]

Join the conversation
9 of 67 comments
  • Cpthaddock Cpthaddock on Aug 27, 2018

    No, there's no deal. The US and MX have an agreement, but to make a deal they now need to get Canada on board. If there's any justice at all in this world, Canada will string he proceedings along until after the mid terms, the way Iran waited for uncle Ronnie to be crowned before releasing their hostages.

    • See 6 previous
    • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey on Aug 28, 2018 A brief history lesson would be quite useful here. Canada existed for nearly 100 years with a very large tariff wall between itself and the USA, called The National Policy. The original Canada-US Free Trade Agreement was the result of the close personal and political friendship between Mulroney and Reagan, at Reagan's urging. Mexico was brought into the agreement a few years later. A great many Canadians were against the Free Trade Agreement and many of their fears were realized. A great many long standing, large and iconic Canadian companies were sold to multi-nationals: Stelco, Dofasco, Algoma, Inco, Falconbridge, Alcan, The Bay, Labatts, Molsons and Tim Hortons being just a few examples. With NAFTA the economies of Canada and the USA have become largely intertwined. The USA could as the POTUS stated 'slap a tariff' on Canadian cars, however FCA would then be doomed as the price of the 300, Charger, Challenger, Caravan and Pacifica would have to be increased to offset the tariff, and production could not just be moved elsewhere. As for negotiations, many Canadians have been hoping to see NAFTA renegotiated for many years, because they believe it 'favours' the USA. Just some examples, it guarantees the USA access to Canadian fresh water and petroleum resources.

  • Hreardon Hreardon on Aug 28, 2018

    On the surface, the new bilateral deals look like a strong slap against China, especially the unlawful routing of components from China, through Mexico. More importantly, this is part of a bigger strategy to start undermining China and strengthen the economies of our southern neighbors. It is much better for America's immigration policy to try and push lower labor cost manufacturing here in the Americas (think Guatemala, Nicaragua, Honduras). The low cost labor manufacturing is going to somewhere, and frankly, I'd rather it stayed in the Americas to help strengthen our neighbors than to support China's rise.

  • Sayahh Is it 1974 or 1794? The article is inconsistent.
  • Laura I just buy a Hyndai Elantra SEL, and My car started to have issues with the AC dont work the air sometimes is really hot and later cold and also I heard a noice in the engine so I went to the dealer for the first service and explain what was hapenning to the AC they told me that the car was getting hot because the vent is not working I didnt know that the car was getting hot because it doesnt show nothing no sign no beep nothing I was surprise and also I notice that it needed engine oil, I think that something is wrong with this car because is a model 23 and I just got it on April only 5 months use. is this normal ? Also my daughter bought the same model and she went for a trip and the car also got hot and it didnt show up in the system she called them and they said to take the car to the dealer for a check up I think that if the cars are new they shouldnt be having this problems.
  • JamesGarfield What charging network does the Polestar use?
  • JamesGarfield Re: Getting away from union plantsAbout a dozen years or so ago, Caterpillar built a huge new engine plant, just down the road here in Seguin TX. Story has it, Caterpillar came to Seguin City council in advance, and told them their plans. Then they asked for no advanced publicity from Seguin, until announcement day. This new plant was gonna be a non-union replacement for a couple of union plants in IL and SC, and Cat didn't want to stir up union problems until the plan was set. They told Seguin, If you about blab this in advance, we'll walk. Well, Seguin kept quiet as instructed, and the plan went through, with all the usual expected tax abatements given.Plant construction began, but the Caterpillar name was conspicuously absent from anywhere on the site. Instead, the plant was described as being a collective of various contractors and suppliers for Caterpillar. Which in fact, it was. Then comes the day, with the big new plant fully operationa!, that Caterpillar comes in and announces, Hey, Yeah it's our plant, and the Caterpillar name boldly goes up on the front. All you contractor folks, welcome aboard, you're now Caterpillar employees. Then, Cat turns and announces they are closing those two union plants immediately, and will be transporting all the heavy manufacturing equipment to Seguin. None of the union workers, just the equipment. And today, the Caterpillar plant sits out there, humming away happily, making engines for the industry and good paying jobs for us. I'd call that a winner.
  • Stuki Moi What Subaru taketh away in costs, dealers will no doubt add right back in adjustments.... Fat chance Subaru will offer a sufficient supply of them.