Edging Up the Price: Ford's Edge ST Starts at $43,350

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Ford promised a gutsy middleweight crossover that it hopes will satisfy enthusiasts after the automaker finishes eliminating the majority of its sporting passenger car segment. For 2019, the Edge ST replaces the standard Sport trim — resulting in added performance and a higher price.

However, it seems like the inflated MSRP will be worthwhile. At $43,350, the Edge ST plays host to a specially tuned 2.7-liter EcoBoost V6 that generates 335 hp and 380 pound-feet of torque — a not immodest improvement over the Sport. It also gets a new eight-speed transmission, all-wheel drive, performance seats, and implements a specially tuned suspension. Considering all of that comes in at roughly $1,500 more than the trim it’s replacing, we’d say the Edge ST is looking like a bargain.

If you don’t find that satisfactory, you can option in a brake package for $2,695 — which comes with 18-inch disc brakes and 21-inch black aluminum wheels. Those brakes can also be had via an upgraded equipment package that costs an additional $5,585 and includes Ford’s Co-Pilot360 collection of driver-assistance features, heated and cooled seats and a hands-free tailgate.

At its most expensive, Automotive News claims the Edge ST will sticker for around $52,000. Those figures were initially shared by CarsDirect, and verified by Ford dealerships. The company has not made any official announcement on pricing, however.

The ST and the rest of the revamped Edge lineup are scheduled to arrive at dealers later this summer.

[Image: Ford Motor Co.]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 61 comments
  • Carguy Carguy on Jul 19, 2018

    I don't know about "bargain". Given that the Edge's cargo capacity is about the same as the new RDX I would pick the RDX every time. It's plenty fast (5.7 seconds to 60) and beats it in both quality and expected reliability while being thousands cheaper.

    • Rocket Rocket on Jul 19, 2018

      "Similar"? That's a stretch. The Edge offers 25% more (39.2 vs 31.1), but still offers more passenger room in both rows.

  • Vehic1 Vehic1 on Jul 19, 2018

    I generally like the Edge styling (not a Ford fanboy), with the exception of that "wide-open-mouth" grille on this model. On the Fusion, it seemed slimmer and more attractive; here, it looks out of place.

  • 3-On-The-Tree Lou_BCone of many cars I sold when I got commissioned into the army. 1964 Dodge D100 with slant six and 3 on the tree, 1973 Plymouth Duster with slant six, 1974 dodge dart custom with a 318. 1990 Bronco 5.0 which was our snowboard rig for Wa state and Whistler/Blackcomb BC. Now :my trail rigs are a 1985 Toyota FJ60 Land cruiser and 86 Suzuki Samurai.
  • RHD They are going to crash and burn like Country Garden and Evergrande (the Chinese property behemoths) if they don't fix their problems post-haste.
  • Golden2husky The biggest hurdle for us would be the lack of a good charging network for road tripping as we are at the point in our lives that we will be traveling quite a bit. I'd rather pay more for longer range so the cheaper models would probably not make the cut. Improve the charging infrastructure and I'm certainly going to give one a try. This is more important that a lowish entry price IMHO.
  • Add Lightness I have nothing against paying more to get quality (think Toyota vs Chryco) but hate all the silly, non-mandated 'stuff' that automakers load onto cars based on what non-gearhead focus groups tell them they need to have in a car. I blame focus groups for automatic everything and double drivetrains (AWD) that really never gets used 98% of the time. The other 2% of the time, one goes looking for a place to need it to rationanalize the purchase.
  • Ger65691276 I would never buy an electric car never in my lifetime I will gas is my way of going electric is not green email
Next