Daimler's Breaking Up the Band: German Giant Plans Massive Corporate Overhaul

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Daimler AG unveiled a new corporate structure on Thursday that splits its core businesses into a three legally independent entities, with one of the arms focusing entirely on mobility and financial services.

It’s a sign of the times as automakers press ever deeper into an uncertain tomorrow, all thanks to mobility and data services. “The new structure positions Daimler to tackle the rapid pace of change in the mobility sector and the corresponding strategic challenges,” explained Supervisory Board chairman Manfred Bischoff. “Legally independent divisions will sharpen our focus on the future success of the business.”

This is no small feat, as altering the structure involves reassigning more than 700 Daimler subsidiaries in over 60 countries. After which, Mercedes-Benz AG, Daimler Truck AG and Daimler Mobility AG will operate as one under the Daimler AG umbrella.

According to the automaker, the new structure will better prepare for the future with “greater entrepreneurial freedom” for divisions, stronger market and customer focus, and the availability of faster and more flexible partnerships. It also adds some protection for the other divisions, as the mobility unit ventures out into untamed territory and new business opportunities.

Already legally independent, Daimler Financial Services will be baked into Daimler Mobility AG.

Once the structure is fully implemented, Daimler says Mercedes-Benz AG should have around 175,000 employees worldwide. Meanwhile, the Trucks & Buses division, under the leadership of Daimler Truck AG, will have around 100,000 employees and Financial Services plays host to roughly 13,000 employees of its own.

Entitled “Project Future,” Daimler believes the new strategies will better position itself for the challenges and opportunities of what it calls “the new automotive era.”

“Project Future is the consistent continuation of our strategy,” said Mercedes-Benz head Dieter Zetsche. “We are reshaping our organization to put Daimler in the best position for the future: technologically, culturally — as well as structurally. At the heart of all these changes are the needs of our customers around the world: With the new structure we will be able to offer them mobility solutions even better tailored to their needs.”

The Board of Management and Supervisory Board for Daimler AG have already approved the divisional structure of the auto group. The matter will now be submitted for approval by shareholders at Daimler’s annual meeting in May of 2019. Full implementation of the corporate strategy is expected by 2020.

[Images: Daimler]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
 2 comments
  • Stuki Stuki on Jul 27, 2018

    "It also adds some protection for the other divisions, as the mobility unit ventures out into untamed territory and new business opportunities." Clever, those Germans.... Recognizing that they, as opposed to many/most others chomping at hopping on the hype train, have something tangible, hard to recreate and valuble to lose.

    • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Jul 28, 2018

      If there's one thing that will survive the "mobility" fad, it's luxury cars and trucks. Wait - that's two things. But there's a danger lurking there too. Isolating the mobility experiment may limit liability issues, but the parent company has to be careful it doesn't drag down the other two divisions financially.

  • 3-On-The-Tree Besides for the sake of emissions I don’t understand why the OEM’s went with small displacement twin turbo engines in heavy trucks. Like you guys stated above there really isn’t a MPG advantage. Plus that engine is under stress pulling that truck around then you hit it with turbos, more rpm’s , air, fuel, heat. My F-150 Ecoboost 3.5 went through one turbo replacement and the other was leaking. l’ll stick with my 2021 V8 Tundra.
  • Syke What I'll never understand about economics reporting: $1.1 billion net income is a mark of failure? Anyone with half a brain recognizes that Tesla is slowly settling in to becoming just another EV manufacturer, now that the legacy manufacturers have gained a sense of reality and quit tripping over their own feet in converting their product lines. Who is stupid enough to believe that Tesla is going to remain 90% of the EV market for the next ten years?Or is it just cheap headlines to highlight another Tesla "problem"?
  • Rna65689660 I had an AMG G-Wagon roar past me at night doing 90 - 100. What a glorious sound. This won’t get the same vibe.
  • Marc Muskrat only said what he needed to say to make the stock pop. These aren't the droids you're looking for. Move along.
  • SCE to AUX I never believed they cancelled it. That idea was promoted by people who concluded that the stupid robotaxi idea was a replacement for the cheaper car; Tesla never said that.
Next