Japan's SoftBank Dumps Cash Into America's Autonomous Vehicles, Sets GM Deadline for 2019

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Several months after procuring a large ownership stake in Uber, SoftBank has placed $2.5 billion into General Motors’ self-driving program. The automaker intends to begin deploying autonomous vehicles next year and CEO Mary Barra says her company will invest $1.1 billion of its own funds into the effort to ensure the timeline is adhered to.

Thanks to the hefty investment from SoftBank’s Vision Fund, the Japanese holding company now owns roughly 20 percent of General Motors’ tech subsidiary, known as Cruise Automation. While tech firms and automakers have been driving hard to surpass each other in terms of autonomous development for years, GM currently appears to have the most riding on the hardware.

The long-term strategy for General Motors sees ride sharing, taxi services, and personal data acquisition as a huge financial opportunities. By launching 13 million connected cars over the next several years, the company thinks it can accrue wealth through an in-car digital marketplace that sells apps and services. Afterward, it can collect driver data (purchasing choices, driving habits, etc.), sell it off to whoever wants it (including insurance companies), and issue in-car advertisements — something it’s already pursuing with help from IBM’s Watson.

However, the keystone to all of this is self-driving cars. The less time a driver has to spend looking at the road, the more time they can spend interacting with the digital marketplace and engage with GM’s carefully chosen partners. Essentially, General Motors can continue making money as a car manufacturer while running a healthy data-focused side business.

It’s something other automakers are considering and actively working on, but GM is making the most noise. Wall Street responded favorably following the company’s initial announcements in 2017, but the automaker’s stock price has been comparatively herky-jerky through 2018.

According to Bloomberg, $1.35 billion of SoftBank’s investment is conditional on the carmaker’s autonomous-driving arm being able to deploy vehicles next year. With so much riding on Cruise’s success, it seems unlikely General Motors would agree to a deal without being highly confident it can deliver.

News of the announcement drove GM’s share price up over 10 percent on Thursday. Assuming it maintains that trajectory, it would result in the largest single-day increase of automaker’s shares in almost a decade.

While SoftBank’s investment is the biggest news in the autonomous driving sphere, it’s not the only story. Waymo announced it will add roughly 62,000 Chrysler Pacifica vans to its fleet. The company intends to expand its driverless ride-hailing program into new markets after piloting it in Phoenix, Arizona, this year.

[Image: General Motors]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 5 comments
  • Redgolf Redgolf on Jun 01, 2018

    only if ALL cars are autonomous! all autonomous vehicles must be equipped with multiple restraints, helmets, and crash proof cocoon systems and 2 car lengths distance kept per 10 mph of speed! still wouldn't want to be sitting in one broken down on I 24 going to or from Nashville!

  • "scarey" "scarey" on Jun 01, 2018

    Does anyone remember the cop cars in the movie Demolition Man ? Auto drive with a foam system to protect the driver and passengers in case of a crash. "Take this job and SHOVEL it"".

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next