Buy/Drive/Burn: The 1993 C-body Showdown to End All Showdowns

by Corey Lewis

Published: May 3rd, 2018

buy drive burn the 1993 c body showdown to end all showdowns

I’ve been saving this one for a while on my Big List of Buy/Drive/Burns. The year is 1993, and you’re shopping the large front-drive sedan offerings from General Motors (rear-drive provides less traction and is archaic). Making a stop at the Oldsmobile, Buick, and Cadillac showrooms, three ruched leather and wood tone sedans await you in top-spec trim. Let’s go.

The ’93 model year was selected because it was the last where all three GM brands had a C-body. For ’94, the DeVille moved on to the Northstar-ready K-body and lost the Touring Sedan variant for a while.

Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight Regency Elite

The Ninety-Eight remained at the top of the sedan offerings for Oldsmobile throughout its final 1991-1996 generation. GM didn’t fit the Rocket brand with its own rear-drive B-body sedan, but opted for the Custom Cruiser estate as its B-body for ’91 and ’92. Ninety-Eight’s Regency Elite trim was introduced for ’92, and came with Buick’s supercharged 3800 L67 engine. The Oldsmobile was the tech marvel of our trio: digital gauges, copious button count, and many trip computer functions across the very horizontal dashboard. Prominence faded from Ninety-Eight by 1995, when the Aurora took over as the new hotness flagship from Oldsmobile.

Buick Park Avenue Ultra

Buick’s C-body is the most upright and traditional of the C-bodies on offer today. Introduced in 1991 next to the Ninety-Eight, the Park Avenue shed its former Electra restraints and struck out on its own. Initially available only in standard trim, Ultra came along a year later. All Ultra models were loaded up, featuring the same supercharged 3800 you’d find in the Oldsmobile. The Park Avenue sat in second place on the Buick model list, slotted beneath the rear-drive Roadmaster. While its interior proved more conservative than the Oldsmobile’s, it was also easier to use. No digital gauge frippery here.

Cadillac DeVille Touring Sedan

The only way to get a V8 (4.9 impressive liters) in your C-body was to head over to the Cadillac showroom. The elder statesman here, DeVille models were part of the first wave of mid-eighties downsizing. It was all new for ’85, as Deville swapped rear-drive for front-drive. The Deville Touring took an interesting mid-pack place in the Cadillac lineup for ’93, above the standard DeVille, but underneath the front-drive Fleetwood and Sixty Special, and rear-drive B-body Fleetwood Brougham. Lengthening and modernization occurred in ’89 and ’91, bringing the DeVille in line with its C-body brethren. Speed-sensitive steering and traction control came standard on the Touring Sedan, as well as special camel-colored leather seats. The conservative interior was rounded out with a horizontal speedometer and minimal buttons and instrumentation. Exterior features included a lack of hood ornament, special Touring wheels, and minimal exterior chrome decoration.

Three flavors of GM’s finest sedan offering of the ’90s. Which one goes home for keeps?

[Images: General Motors]

#1990s #Buick #Buick3800 #BuickParkAvenue #Buy/Drive/Burn #Cadillac #CadillacDeville #GeneralMotors #GM #LuxuryCars #UsedCars #Oldsmobile #Sedans #OldsmobileNinety-eight #NewsBlog

Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 86 comments

Delerium75 on May 04, 2018

The normally aspirated 3800 was standard on all 98s in '93. Only the 98 Touring Sedan had the supercharged 3.8 available as an option...it was not available on the Elite.

Like Reply
Gearhead77 on May 09, 2018

Burn the Olds. This is most definitely "Your Grandfathers Oldsmobile" and it's just too old looking. Drive the Cadillac. Plain (compared to the others), I have a soft spot for Cadillacs thanks to my 84 Eldo and my folks 94 Deville Concours. In blue collar Pittsburgh, a Cadillac in those days always got more of nod to "making it" than the other two. Buy the Buick- None of these are stellar automobiles compared to their forebearers wearing the same badge. But the Buick doesn't look as Old as the Olds nor as rich as the Caddy. Supercharged 3800 would have more than enough oomph compared to the 4.9 if not the smoothness, though I did like the sound of the 4.9

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Ltcmgm78 It depends on whether or not the union is a help or a hindrance to the manufacturer and workers. A union isn't needed if the manufacturer takes care of its workers.
Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.