Toyota Wants More Dudes Buying the RAV4, Along With Everyone Else

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The RAV4 has quickly become Toyota’s most important vehicle. While the Corolla still trumps it in overall global volume, the small crossover has made a ridiculous amount of headway over the past decade. Prior to the recession, domestic sales of the RAV4 just barely surpassed 70,000 units per year. Then, after the introduction of the model’s third generation in 2006, volume suddenly doubled — progressing to 2017’s all-time high of 407,594 deliveries.

Still, Toyota thinks it can further broaden the model’s appeal. It wants to see more men behind the wheel of the redesigned 2019 model that debuted at the New York International Auto Show last week. The recipe involves a more butch design, added power, an upgraded all-wheel drive system, and new trim levels giving a nod to sporting aspirations. Meanwhile, an updated interior provides more space for manspreading and big rubbery knobs some gentleman find totally irresistible.

It’s a different story with the 2018 RAV4. It’s incredibly practical and quite comfortable within its segment, but lacks some of the edge of its successor and isn’t a lot of fun from the driver’s seat — two things we’re told most men care about. According to Toyota General Manager Jack Hollis, the fourth-gen RAV4’s best-selling year saw 56 percent of sales going to women and only 44 percent to men. In a perfect world, he says an even split would be much better for a high-volume model.

The rest of Toyota agreed and the hunt for more men directly influenced the fifth generation’s design. “We’ve doubled RAV4 sales in the last four years, so when you do that and you’re at the 400,000 level, you have to appeal to a broader part of the market,” Bill Fay, senior vice president of automotive operations, told Automotive News in an interview. “We put part of that challenge into the development of this.”

A big part of that will be further separating the trim levels in both appearance and function. Last year, Toyota introduced the Adventure trim to draw in males. But it offers little more than a unique set of wheels, a tow prep package, and some very mild off-road aesthetics. On the new model, the face of the vehicle is completely different from the rest of the lineup — borrowing heavily from the rugged styling of the FT-AC Concept.

However, Toyota doesn’t want to focus entirely on looks. It claims the new RAV4 should be more capable both on and off the pavement. While it’s unlikely to best a Jeep Wrangler on a craggy hillside, it should trounce its predecessor by a wide margin. But we all know the most serious action most examples of this unibody crossover will see are pothole-riddled city streets on a particularly snowy day, something the upgraded suspension and torque-vectoring AWD systems should handle nicely.

Toyota is even covering the sporting angle. The old RAV4 doesn’t really have a sport variant to speak of, despite the hybrid model technically offering more power. But the focus was always on efficiency at the expense of some cargo space, and it delivered overall. For 2019, Toyota keeps the hybrid (now with the battery under the rear seat) as the most fuel-efficient option but adds an XSE trim for those truly interested in performance.

The manufacturer says the XSE will be the fastest and best handling version of the RAV4, thanks to a stronger powertrain (details forthcoming) and sport-tuned suspension. But it also added styling cues not found on any other model. It gets the contrasting roof of the Adventure model in black, along with black-painted fender overriders, mirrors, wheels, and bumpers.

On the other end of the spectrum will be the more luxurious Limited trim, which Toyota has equipped with upscale materials and thinks will make up a large portion of sales to women. This will be further helped by an ad campaign that helps distinguish the trim levels and their purpose, with each targeted at a specific demographic. But will it work?

It certainly did on me. While I haven’t seen the marketing materials yet, I can attest to being utterly taken with the updated RAV4 after spending fifteen minutes with it at the New York Auto Show. Without driving impressions, there is no reason to commit to anything fully. But the new styling and hardware seems like a big win and I’m desperate to find out more. The models themselves are also incredibly different. The Adventure and XSE look totally unique, despite only a handful of trim pieces separating the two. The Limited’s interior is above average for this class of vehicle.

Toyota definitely hit the mark in terms of intent, but it will be interesting to see how the public responds. Building a better car doesn’t always guarantee more volume, but we have a strong feeling the new RAV4 will help close the gender gap for Toyota’s best-selling model.

[Images: Toyota]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 164 comments
  • Mopar4wd Mopar4wd on Apr 03, 2018

    I found a 2007 or 2008 with the V6 white middle trim that was clean back in July but the dealer (BHPH) wanted to much for it cash.

  • Mchan1 Mchan1 on Apr 12, 2018

    Rented a Rav4 LE for a week and it was bad but wasn't great either. No lumbar support and the engine was weak and had to keep the transmission on Sport mode to get life from the engine. The stereo system Sukked Ash and couldn't even program the stations! WTF?! It was relatively roomy for a 6 footer with wide shoulders and average build and had room in back as well. I'd consider buying the newer Hybrid AWD Rav4 in the future considering that there's currently really just 2 options available for Hybrid CUVs... Rav4 or Rogue. Hopefully, the fuel economy is improved and the engines are replaced with new, powerful versions.

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next