Fiat Chrysler Can Look Forward to a Big Summer Eco Payout

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

When Fiat Chrysler Automobiles regails the class with a “how I spend my summer” story this fall, expect some mention of handing over large sums of money to state and federal governments.

The U.S. Department of Justice and California Air Resources Board want the automaker to make things right after accusing it of polluting the nation’s air via its 3.0-liter EcoDiesel V6 engines. Some 104,000 Jeep and Ram vehicles from the 2014 to 2016 model years contained emissions control devices not revealed to the Environmental Protection Agency, which came down hard on the automaker after their discovery. According to FCA’s lawyer, the settlement could come this summer.

What does the DOJ want? According to an earlier settlement offer sent to the automaker, the levelling of “very substantial civil penalties” is the only way to ensure FCA learns its lesson.

At a federal court hearing in San Francisco on Tuesday, FCA lawyer Robert Giuffra said settlement documents were being exchanged between lawyers of both parties. Expect a settlement between FCA and the DOJ “probably sometime during the summer,” he told Reuters.

Talks between the two parties are reportedly progressing at a “swift pace.” That’s the way court-appointed advisor Ken Feinberg describes it, anyway.

So far, neither the DOJ or CARB have mentioned just how much penalty cash FCA might be on the hook for. While the vehicles in question await a fix designed to bring the engines into compliance, any civil payout would have to be accompanied by environmental mitigation efforts — no unlike those seen in the Volkswagen diesel settlement. Just fixing the older vehicles and ensuring new ones remain clean will not be enough. (The EPA gave 2017 Ram and Jeep EcoDiesels the green light back in July.)

FCA never admitted to any wrongdoing in the EcoDiesel saga.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • Carson D It will work out exactly the way it did the last time that the UAW organized VW's US manufacturing operations.
  • Carson D A friend of mine bought a Cayenne GTS last week. I was amazed how small the back seat is. Did I expect it to offer limousine comfort like a Honda CR-V? I guess not. That it is far more confining and uncomfortable than any 4-door Civic made in the past 18 years was surprising. It reminded me of another friend's Mercedes-Benz CLS550 from a dozen years ago. It seems like a big car, but really it was a 2+2 with the utilitarian appearance of a 4-door sedan. The Cayenne is just an even more utilitarian looking 2+2. I suppose the back seat is bigger than the one in the Porsche my mother drove 30 years ago. The Cayenne's luggage bay is huge, but Porsche's GTs rarely had problems there either.
  • Stanley Steamer Oh well, I liked the Legacy. It didn't help that they ruined it's unique style after 2020. It was a classy looking sedan up to that point.
  • Jalop1991 https://notthebee.com/article/these-people-wore-stop-signs-to-prank-self-driving-cars-and-this-is-a-trend-i-could-totally-get-behindFull self stopping.
  • Lou_BC Summit Racing was wise to pull the parts. It damages their reputation. I've used Summit Racing for Jeep parts that I could not find elsewhere.
Next