Breaking Up Isn't Hard to Do: Fiat Chrysler Announces Parts Division Spin-off

by Steph Willems

Published: April 5th, 2018

breaking up em isn t em hard to do fiat chrysler announces parts division

As Magneti Marelli prepares for its 100th birthday next year, the Italian parts supplier can expect to mark the occasion while newly single.

In a bid to streamline its operations, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles has announced it is moving forward with a plan to spin off the weighty subsidiary. The split should be complete by the end of this year or early next.

Magneti Marelli manufactures numerous automotive components, from lighting to powertrain parts to electronics, and employs roughly 43,000 workers in 19 countries. Dozens of manufacturing plants exist under its umbrella. Started as a joint venture between Fiat and Ercole Marelli in 1919, the company officially became a Fiat subsidiary in 1967.

According to Reuters, analysts estimate the division’s net worth at between 4.4 and 6.1 billion dollars.

Early Thursday, FCA issued a statement saying its board of directors had “authorized FCA management to develop and implement a plan to separate the Magneti Marelli business from FCA and to distribute shares of a new holding company for Magneti Marelli to the shareholders of FCA.” The company’s shares will be listen on the Milan stock exchange.

FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne stated that spinning off the division will “deliver value” to FCA shareholders and put Magneti Marelli in a position for growth. “The spin-off will also allow FCA to further focus on its core portfolio while at the same time improving its capital position,” he said.

The parts business was just one of the pieces of the FCA pie rumored to separate from the flock last year. Alfa Romeo and Maserati were included in this list, but Marchionne squashed murmurs of the brands’ impending spin-off. The same rumors circulated around Jeep after reports emerged Chinese automakers expressing interest in acquiring the brand. Jeep, Marchionne said, is not for sale.

FCA remains on a fairly aggressive debt-cutting spree, with the automaker hoping to finish the year in the black.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

#Fca #FiatChryslerAutomobiles #MagnetiMarelli #Spinoffs #Suppliers

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 4 comments

Ect on Apr 05, 2018

"automaker hoping to finish the year in the black." Huh? FCA has been and is in the black. 2017 net profit, for example, was €5 billion.

Like Reply
Ohioeric on Apr 07, 2018

Didn't work out so well for Delphi from GM or Visteon from Ford. Third time is a charm? I doubt it.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.