BMW Replaces M2 Coupe With 'M2 Competition' This Summer

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

For a long time BMW was being accused of losing its touch when it came to building the “ultimate driving machine.” People would gripe that the company’s tech was overshadowing driving enjoyment. That may be true to some degree but you could usually point them to the M division and tell them not to worry.

However, most people don’t have the kind of money required to facilitate the purchase of an M3 — and if they don’t have the cash for that, then they definitely aren’t going to pick up the superb M5. But that’s okay because BMW eventually built the M2 and it’s probably the best car in its lineup.

That’s why we are somewhat surprised to learn BMW will be giving the fun-loving coupe a dirt nap, replacing it with the more hardcore “M2 Competition.” It’s not a new car in the strictest sense, but it is a slightly different mindset.

More is more. That’s the theory the M2 Competition works under as it borrows heavily from the M3 and M4, starting with their engine. BMW opted to ditch N55 and replace it with the S55, leaving us with an twin-scroll inline-six of the same displacement and more power. The 3.0-liter now makes 405 horsepower and 406 pound-feet of torque — which is an increase of 40 and 63, respectively.

That shaves off roughly a quarter of a second from the M2’s 0-to-60 time, although the 7-speed dual-clutch automatic is a touch faster than the manual. According to BMW, DTC-equipped models can hit the mark in four seconds flat but the manual takes an additional 0.2 seconds.

The M2 Competition gets a number of chassis improvements to handle the upgraded power, which also appear to be borrowed from the bigger M cars. A carbon fiber strut helps out with front-end stiffness, while aluminum is the new material of choice for control arms and the front and rear axles.

Steering has been “enhanced” but we’re hoping not in the same way as the M3/M4. Both models offer an unpleasant electronic vagueness that takes some time to become accustomed to and is among their biggest drawbacks. We’d like to have seen BMW talk about feedback but instead the improvements made in regard to steering appear to revolve around how it works with speed. It’s electronically adjustable.

You can actually customize most of the car’s settings and assign them as presets, including the engine and transmission, if you have the dual clutch. A slick-sounding electronic limited-slip differential handles power delivery to the rear wheels and bigger M Sport brakes are said to bring the vehicle down to a stop faster than its predecessor.

Aesthetically, it’s not all that different from the outgoing M2 Coupe. However, we’re not convinced all the changes made were wise ones. First of all the seats, which seem very nice, come with an illuminated M2 logo embedded in the backrest. That’s borderline tacky, but whatever. The new 19-inch wheels, wrapped in 254/35-series front and 265/35-series rear tires, only come in various shades of black. You can either have all black or a bi-color design that is still partially blacked out.

The enlarged kidney grille also ditches its chrome for a shade of midnight crude. Can you guess what color the new exhaust tips are? I bet you can.

While the de-chroming of the M2 does give it sort of a track-car vibe we’re sure many will appreciate, it seems strange they wouldn’t offer it as part of an appearance package. In fact, the whole car has a sort of “special edition” feel about it. However, BMW is doing this kind of stuff on all of the M vehicles so it makes sense in a broader context. I just feel that Competition lacks the broader appeal the coupe has. Fortunately, it’ll probably make up for it in performance. We just pray copying the M3/M4 exhaust setup (flaps and all) and styling doesn’t involve copying fake noises being piped in through the audio system.

The 2019 M2 Competition should arrive at BMW dealerships this summer. Pricing has yet to be announced but expect it to surpass the 2018 M2 coupe’s $54,500 base price.

[Images: BMW Group]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 16 comments
  • DearS DearS on Apr 19, 2018

    Glad the V6 Camaro exists. $26k 330HP.

    • Cognoscenti Cognoscenti on Apr 19, 2018

      I'm glad too. Unfortunately, you can't see out of the thing - it's so dark in there!

  • Lon888 Lon888 on Apr 20, 2018

    Where in the hell are the other 4 cylinders? In the motor picture above I can visualize 2 cylinders under the plastic cover but the other 4 must be buried in the firewall. If a plug change cost $10,000 on this car, I'd believe it! What a shade tree mechanics nightmare.

  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next