Buy Ford Stock for the F-150 Alone, Morgan Stanley Tells Investors
It’s no secret Ford Motor Company cut its previous CEO, Mark Fields, loose after the company’s stock price fell 40 percent during his time at the helm. Eager to attract investors, Fields’ superiors must have looked at General Motors’ and Tesla’s valuation and wondered, Dammit, if a very profitable company and a very unprofitable company can do it, then hell, so should we.
Out the door Fields went. Since taking the big chair in Dearborn, CEO Jim Hackett has pissed off automotive purists with his “future cities” and mobility talk, and word that the Mach 1 will return as an electric crossover hasn’t done anything to endear him to the pony car crowd. The new Mustang Bullitt does not erase this sin.
Animosity aside, Hackett has managed to place a checkmark next to a top item on his to-do list: get Wall Street’s attention.
On Wednesday, Morgan Stanley changed its tune on the company, reversing its classification from “underweight” to “overweight” and raising its price target from $10 to $15. It’s the equivalent of saying “buy this stock.” Since 2014, the investment firm has told investors to do the opposite.
“A window of opportunity has opened up for Ford,” the firm’s analysts wrote in a note.
Hackett’s plan to slash streamline his way to improved profitability impressed the firm, garnering the company a greatly improved earnings forecast. By cutting low-profit, slow-selling models and investing heavily in utility vehicles (Ford’s transferring $7 billion in development funds from cars to trucks and SUVs), as well as chopping $14 billion in engineering costs, Hackett wants to position the Blue Oval as Detroit’s leanest, most forward-thinking automaker. Please, no pushing when you line up to invest.
“We see Ford as an out-of-favor self-help story with room to surprise the market with cost-savings and profit repositioning potential,” Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas wrote in a research note.
The firm also said the F-150 truck franchise might be worth up to 150 percent of the company’s value. It’s indeed a juggernaut, and there’s little reason to believe the F-150 won’t reign over the full-size truck segment for years to come (F-Series sales rose even during the brand’s F ebruary downturn).
The impact of Morgan Stanley’s improved outlook on Ford’s stock was immediate, if slight. Shares rose 2.2 percent by the end of Wednesday trading, adding an extra 1 percent since trading started Thursday. Despite the lift, Ford’s stock hasn’t recouped the losses seen in January, when share prices fell from $13.23 on January 12th to $10.24 on February 5th. The stock currently sits at $11.11.
[Sources: Automotive News, MarketWatch] [Image: Ford Motor Company]
More by Steph Willems
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
- Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
- Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
- Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
- Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
Comments
Join the conversation
Doesn't all this sound like the second coming of Jacques Nasser? He did the exact same thing, only to be blamed when oil prices boomed --and "Detroit" was blamed for not having fuel-efficient *cars* like the Japanese. About the only thing Hackett hasn't done yet is express an interest in junkyards and quick-oil-change shops. I said it before: Ford needs to go private. Despite making tons of profits since Mulally was boss their stock has really gone nowhere. Wall Street could care less if the Ford "Mach 1" is the greatest electric SUV ever built; they kneel down to worship Elon the Great.
Well, have a look at Ford's global performance. China down 30%, Ford Australia, totally reliant on the Ranger and Mustang, what is the plan here? Trump import tariff on aluminium. Remember Ford was the only auto manufacturer to make this complaint due to dismal profits. A potential down swing in US sales. Ford is looking good, or maybe not.