QOTD: Has Technology Ever Saved Your Hide?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It’s looking like the winter of 2018 is something many of us will talk about, probably with much venom and/or wonder, in the years to come. Unpredictable, erratic, and prone to extremes — at least so far. North Carolina received a blizzard yesterday, providing Bozi Tatarevic’s WRX with an opportunity to shine. As for myself, upon returning home from Detroit I discovered my car’s doors sealed shut with ice. Nothing short of a blowtorch will pry those portals open.

Oh well. It’s going to warm up this week. I have a bottle of Jack and a selection of non-perishables.

While in Detroit, a colleague told of his adventure on a slushy, crowded Toronto-area highway, during which the back end of his F-150 got very loose while navigating the shallowest of turns at high speed. Electronic stability control kicked in, did its job, and the trip continued without incident. This got me to thinking — with new cars leaving the factory with an ever-increasing roster of electronic nannies, how often do these driver aids actually avert disaster?

Have you ever had your ass hauled out of the fire by the last-second intervention of a newfangled safety feature?

To avoid making this question too broad, we’ll exempt things like airbags and seatbelts from the criteria, as well as anti-lock brakes. Only driver aids from the last several years apply: blind spot monitoring, lane-holding, rear cross-traffic alert, automatic emergency braking, collision warning, and the always useful stability control. Maybe it was a backup camera that prevented tragedy. The list goes on and on.

A few times, I’ve had a press car deploy the brakes prematurely to head off a collision, but only because the previous driver cranked the system to its most sensitive setting. In all of those incidents, however, my eyes were on the road ahead and there was plenty of time to put my right leg to use. The same might not true for some of our readers.

Let us know what happened to make you glad you shelled out for a well-equipped vehicle.

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 73 comments
  • Pwrwrench Pwrwrench on Jan 19, 2018

    I do not have a vehicle with any of this stuff. The SOs Mustang has ABS which has activated a few times. I think that this stuff is working for others. Over time I have seen many houses on corners and intersections that regularly have to replace/repair walls and fences due to late night weekend enthusiasts. A house 1/4 mile down the road from mine is on a 90 deg bend and often had cars go through a fence and into their pool. They put a bunch of washing machine size boulders in the yard in front of the fence. There has not been a crash there in at least 4 years so the tech devices might be having some success.

  • HahnZahn HahnZahn on Jan 19, 2018

    Yes. The AEB part of the EyeSight suite in my new Impreza in all likelihood prevented an accident about a week after I got it last year. I was exiting the freeway when another car decided to also exit in front of me very late. The offramp at this particular exit is usually very open, though curvy. On this morning, it was backed up. The driver who yoinked in front of me at the last instant then had to slam on her brakes due to the backup she probably couldn't see due to the curves and driving like an idiot. I was already moving my foot to brake, then the AEB kicked in even sooner. It was hard enough to trigger the antilock brakes. Nothing quite like feeling that sickening vibration in your brand-new car due to someone else's negligence. I don't know that it 100% prevented the accident, but it didn't hurt. That incident also was the factor that led to me getting a dashcam. I see a lot of skeptics on car websites who arrogantly declare that "just paying attention" prevents accidents, but this technology can only help.

  • CanadaCraig My 2006 300C SRT8 weighs 4,100 lbs. The all-new 2024 Dodge Charge EV weighs 5,800 lbs. Would it not be fair to assume that in an accident the vehicles these new Chargers hit will suffer more damage? And perhaps kill more people?
  • Akila Hello Everyone, I found your blog very informative. If you want to know more about [url=
  • Michael Gallagher I agree to a certain extent but I go back to the car SUV transition. People began to buy SUVs because they were supposedly safer because of their larger size when pitted against a regular car. As more SUVs crowded the road that safety advantage began to dwindle as it became more likely to hit an equally sized SUV. Now there is no safety advantage at all.
  • Probert The new EV9 is even bigger - a true monument of a personal transportation device. Not my thing, but credit where credit is due - impressive. The interior is bigger than my house and much nicer with 2 rows of lounge seats and 3rd for the plebes. 0-60 in 4.5 seconds, around 300miles of range, and an e-mpg of 80 (90 for the 2wd). What a world.
  • Ajla "Like showroom" is a lame description but he seems negotiable on the price and at least from what the two pictures show I've dealt with worse. But, I'm not interested in something with the Devil's configuration.
Next