When Will We See Chinese Cars On North American Roads?

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

It seems like we’ve been hearing about it forever — that fateful day when China surpasses the United States by every single metric imaginable and forces everyone to drive its cars. While that premonition has already come to pass in some respects, there’s still no overtly Chinese automobiles milling around on North American roads.

However, manufacturers from The People’s Republic have been looking westward for a decade. I can recall BYD Auto, along with other Chinese firms, having a booth in the basement of the North American International Auto Show way back in 2008. They weren’t there because they had nothing better to do — they were there to size up the competition and let America know they were coming. Of course, nothing happens overnight and Chinese automakers have been a little busy converting their domestic market into the world’s largest. But the time for westward expansion is fast approaching.

Geely Automotive may be among the closest to achieving the goal. Having already stated its intention to bring its Lynk & Co subsidiary to Europe and North America, it’s also the current owner of both London Taxi Co and Volvo Cars. While neither of those brands are distinctively Chinese, Volvo’s XC40 rides on the same Compact Modular Architecture as Lynk & Co’s 01 crossover.

“We have in the Western world an outrageous arrogance. We think we’re ahead. It’s going to change,” Alain Visser, senior vice president of Lynk & Co, told Reuters in a recent interview. “China is passing you at a speed that, in our arrogance, we don’t even see.”

Geely has tasked Visser specifically with the global expansion of Lynk and, so far, that strategy involves selling cars through directly-owned stores or online instead of through traditional dealer franchises. That’s going to be a little harder in the U.S., but the brand has a solution — subscription services. Volvo is even testing the waters for Lynk & Co by offering the proposed services on the XC40.

However, GAC Motor president Yu Jun recently stated that his company is still hoping to beat everyone else to the party and launch products in the American market within the next two years.

“We are building the first North America R&D Center in Silicon Valley this year and planning to enter the North American market by 2019,” he said in a release. GAC has also said it wants to have a strong presence at the 2018 North American International Auto Show and intends to bring the GA4, GA8, GM8, GS8, and a handful of concept models to Detroit next month.

Market research has positioned its likely entry point somewhere on the East Coast of the United States, with Massachusetts, Connecticut, Maine and New York being the obvious candidates. The first car it wants to sell? Probably the Trumpchi GS8 sport utility vehicle. However, its name will be adjusted to avoid any political complications. “We respect culture in the U.S. and understand there’s no precedence to use the current president’s name as a brand name,” the company explained.

It’s not going to be a silky smooth entry for Chinese automakers, however. Most countries are exceptionally wary of unproven foreign brands. Japan still isn’t particularly fond of American autos and it took the U.S. years before it was willing to accept cars developed in The Land of the Rising Sun. Meanwhile, Korean brands have only just begun to witness the softening of Western hearts.

“A key obstacle in markets like the United States is a consumer bias against Chinese-made goods,” said Jeff Cai, a Beijing-based senior director at JD Power & Associates. “Our research found most U.S. consumers think China is a third-world country that builds low-quality products.”

Further complicating the matter is China’s repeated sin of copying other country’s designs. Every Changan SUV is basically a Land Rover doppelganger; the LandWind X7 is a Range Rover Evoque, the JAC A6 is an Audi A6, the Lifan 330 is a Mini Cooper, the Kawei K1 and JAC 4R3 are both the Ford F-150, and it just goes on and on like that.

In the past, foreign companies filing claims of copyright infringement in the region are usually defeated by the Chinese government, which frequently sides with domestic carmakers. So there is little reason for manufacturers not to copy. It certainly hasn’t made anyone sympathetic to the plight of Chinese manufacturers (even those not guilty of the misdeed) trying to break into Europe and North America.

That said, we doubt it’ll be any single automaker’s undoing. Most consumers are unaware of China’s penchant for duplicating designs, and will only need to be convinced that its brands can offer a solid product for a reasonable price.

[Image: GAC]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 58 comments
  • Toxicroach Toxicroach on Dec 18, 2017

    I don't want to be that guy, but I'm going to be that guy. Half the taxis in Costa Rica are cheap Chinese sedans, the kind that makes 2007 Chryslers look like BMWs. Costa Rica is in North America, so... gotcha.

  • 415s30 415s30 on Dec 30, 2017

    Not in a million years would I buy a Chinese car.

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next