UAW Prez Gets It All Off His Chest, Slams Ford Motor Company

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

United Auto Workers president Dennis Williams, due to retire in June, isn’t letting Ford Motor Company off the hook for its recent decision to send production of a key product south of the border. Actually, as union heads are wont to do, he’s not letting his government off the hook, either.

The question Williams would like Ford CEO Jim Hackett to answer is: what Mexicans are going to buy an electric Ford?

In an interview with the Detroit Free Press, Williams said he was “angry at Ford” for the unexpected decision, earlier this month, to shift production of its upcoming electric crossover from Flat Rock, Michigan, plant to a facility in Cuautitlan, Mexico.

“[Ford] has an opportunity to do something for the state of Michigan and the United States of America,” Williams said. “People in Mexico are not going to buy electric vehicles. And we desperately need high-paying jobs and technology here. I mean, 7% of vehicle cost is labor. How much do they need to make in profits?”

The 300-mile crossover in question, which Ford hopes will be an early class leader, was intended to start production at a retooled Flat Rock plant in 2020. While the production location has changed, it’s assumed the timeline hasn’t.

In a memo, Ford implied the switch to cheaper Mexican production was key to creating an “affordable,” “mainstream” electric vehicle in this class. Flat Rock, in turn, will become the center of Ford’s autonomous vehicle efforts, with a self-driving commercial hybrid vehicle being its first product. The automaker has pledged $150 million towards this product, expected in 2021.

With Ford choosing high-skilled work like autonomous vehicle development for the Rust Belt locale, Williams worries about blue-collar workers being left behind as traditional manufacturing moves south. If autonomy and electric vehicles are indeed the future, he says, both should remain American built. Ford disputes this, claiming U.S. self-driving vehicle production is beneficial to workers.

Not surprisingly, Williams reserved some harsh criticism for the Trump administration, the recently passed GOP tax bill (which he feels will increase outsourcing), and what he sees as a shortsighted government approach to industrial policy. Meaning that there isn’t any.

“We’ve got to have a higher level of education to meet the next generation of technology,” he said. “We’re being left behind for a lot of greed.”

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 22 comments
  • SuperCarEnthusiast SuperCarEnthusiast on Dec 22, 2017

    All the future EV will be still tiny size vehicles other then Tesla models! Very few people what a subcompact size vehicles but that size all EVs manufacturers are gunning for other then Tesla! LOL! Plus, it has to look dorky too other then Tesla models!

  • D. Saxton D. Saxton on Dec 22, 2017

    The Union head is absolutely right. This move is taking technology away from the U.S to lower wage Countries like Mexico, at the cost to our own citizens employment stability. It's bad enough that Ford is moving their small car production out of the U.S. and sending it to China, but technology transfer should not be allowed if Trump means what he says about Making America Great Again, and bringing jobs back to the U.S.A. . I'm not a Trump supporter by any means, and it's examples like this that only reinforces my beliefs it's all just BS.

  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
Next