Germany and Italy Oppose Stiffer European Car Approval Rules

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Italy and Germany are opposing attempts to give the European Union more authority over the way national car regulators approve new cars for sale. As wild as it is to learn that Germany is standing in the way of stricter automotive regulation and oversight, allow us to assure you that you’ve not misread the above statement. For some reason, Deutschland doesn’t want to see enhanced industry surveillance.

Our best guess is that the opposition has something to do with Volkswagen Group’s diesel crisis, recent concerns that BMW may have utilized a “shut off” device that masked NOx emissions, and the ongoing investigation into a German automotive cartel that may have operated for decades. But there’s also a chance these automakers simply don’t want to deal with the red tape that comes along with piling on government oversight.

According to Reuters, Germany’s official stance opposes inspections because “any kind of audit means extra bureaucracy without being beneficial.”

However, European Union Industry Commissioner Elzbieta Bienkowska told the outlet, “We need more quality and independence in the system, more checks of cars already in circulation, and European oversight,” adding that she was optimistic an agreement finally seems within reach.

The EU documents seen by Reuters show lawmakers want the Commission to be able to carry out routine audits of national car approval authorities. While some member states — like France — support two days of verification every five years, Italy and seven other nations are requesting conditions that would weaken the Commission’s oversight power. Obviously, Germany is the biggest fish among them.

One of the biggest issues surrounding the new rules is the possible expansion of on-road emission tests each country is obligated to conduct. After all, those were the types of tests that caught Volkswagen cheating in 2015 and may have also uncovered something similar with BMW this year. However, additional research needs to be done before BMW can be indicted for anything. At present, the company has dismissed the allegations as a smear campaign, claiming the manufacturer would fight any accusations to the contrary.

Still, even if BMW has done nothing wrong, the paranoia that another emissions crisis is just around the corner remains palpable. “It boils down to: do we want the Commission to put its nose in the affairs of the national type-approval authorities?” an unnamed diplomat told Reuters. “After Dieselgate, it’s hard to say no.”

A recent draft compromise has proposed member states conduct checks on one in every 40,000 new vehicles registered; 20 percent of those must include emissions tests. It’s actually less than what the European Parliament originally requested, and environmental groups have criticized the proposal for being more lax than the current U.S. standards.

The European Union also gave up on the Commission’s attempt to stop automakers from using paid laboratories for vehicle testing. Instead, they wanted to implement a system where labs were contracted by the state in hopes they would be more objective. However, the existing draft does include measures allowing the EU to issue continent-wide recalls of suspect automobiles.

[Image: University of West Virginia]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 11 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Dec 06, 2017

    It's funny that they're testing emissions in the photo, and there's a Honda generator with its own tailpipe, generating its own emissions (along with electricity).

    • See 1 previous
    • Jack Denver Jack Denver on Dec 07, 2017

      The U. of W. Virginia is not exactly rolling in dough and they jury rigged their mobile testing machine out of equipment that was designed to be stationary and plugged into house current - thus the Honda generator. I hope that the EPA gives some of the billions in fines that VW is going to pay to U.W.Va. to fund their future work. The EPA with all their billions ($8 billion/year) should have figured this out years ago. Testing the cars on a fixed cycle on a dyno instead of testing them under real world conditions was asking for trouble.

  • Dane61 Dane61 on Dec 07, 2017

    It's West Virginia University, not the University of West Virginia. Different entities.

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next