KPMG Study Has Even More Bad News for the Lowly Sedan

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The hard-done-by sedan, once as commonplace as weeds, junk mail, and shattered dreams, doesn’t need any more of a push as it shuffles towards its waiting grave. The buying public is already killing the segment through neglect. Last month, the once-Godlike midsize sedan fell below 10-percent market share in the U.S.

It’s grim times for the traditional sedan, be it compact, midsize, or land yacht. However, anyone hoping for a plateau or even a sales revival is kidding themselves, according to a study by KPMG. The advent of technology will only push more buyers away from sedans and towards their one true love.

The latest threat? Mobility services like ride-hailing in big and medium-sized cities. An even larger threat comes from automation, as such services stand to become much cheaper once you remove the driver from the equation. Cheaper service means more users. And with it, fewer people buying that commuter car, which is traditionally a smaller sedan or hatch.

In its study, KPMG “projects that sales of personally-owned sedans in the U.S. will drop precipitously – from 5.4 million units sold today to just 2.1 million units by 2030.”

The predicted move towards ride-hailing services among commuters means households could save that one vehicle purchase for something big, something desirable. Something that covers most of the bases. A truck or SUV for vacations, road trips, and the like. But probably not a compact or midsize sedan.

KPMG sees the future of mobility as growing out of some 150 urban and suburban areas in the U.S., with each city possessing its own specific needs. The firm expects a piecemeal start as the technology rolls out. Ride-hailing fleets, helmed by automakers, will not emerge en masse across the landscape. Like with “old fashioned” services like Uber and Lyft, the biggest cities (“islands of autonomy”) will see the option first. This means smaller cities, and certainly towns and rural areas, will remain stuck in a traditional car-buying market for some time to come.

“This creates an extremely complex problem for today’s OEMs, as they can no longer segment markets merely by traditional vehicle segment methodologies to create a vehicle that covers all user needs,” said Gary Silberg, automotive sector leader at KPMG LLP. “Instead, the OEMs that win will be those who identify the correct product portfolio within billions of individual trips across hundreds of islands.”

KPMG feels it’s possible that technology will advance far enough to have autonomous ride-hailing fleets in all decent-sized U.S. cities by the end of next decade. By this time, sedan sales will have shrunk so much, the majority of automakers won’t sell them.

“Several OEMs will likely close plants and exit the segment entirely,” said Tom Mayor, KPMG’s strategy leader for industrial manufacturing. “At these volumes, we would expect the current 10 OEMs serving the U.S. market with more than 800,000 sedans per year to contract to only three or four.”

KPMG’s predictions are just that. So, fallible. The rollout of autonomous vehicles, even in urban fleets, might not be as swift as the firm believes. Still, there’s no denying that we’ll see the culling of a great number of sedan nameplates in the coming years if sales continue on their present course.

[Image: Honda]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • Sanman111 Sanman111 on Nov 28, 2017

    Hmm, will any of these autonomous vehicles that will be picking up future us be... Sedans? No mention of that in the article. Not to mention that all the evidence suggests is that car sales overall will go down. Not sedans as a percentage of car sales. However, I don't disagree with the premise. As cars become more like washing machines, they will all converge toward Max utility. However, autonomous minivans make more sense than autonomous SUVs. Minivans and hatchbacks. Make my personal pod a convertible with a v8, thank you.

  • DearS DearS on Nov 28, 2017

    I love cars like the BRZ and Corvette, but it is great to have more than a sedan to carry stuff around. I am getting a CR-V or like wagon next.

  • SaulTigh Unless we start building nuclear plants and beefing up the grid, this drive to electrification (and not just cars) will be the destruction of modern society. I hope you love rolling blackouts like the US was some third world failed state. You don't support 8 billion people on this planet without abundant and relatively cheap energy.So no, I don't want an electric car, even if it's cheap.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Lou_BCone of many cars I sold when I got commissioned into the army. 1964 Dodge D100 with slant six and 3 on the tree, 1973 Plymouth Duster with slant six, 1974 dodge dart custom with a 318. 1990 Bronco 5.0 which was our snowboard rig for Wa state and Whistler/Blackcomb BC. Now :my trail rigs are a 1985 Toyota FJ60 Land cruiser and 86 Suzuki Samurai.
  • RHD They are going to crash and burn like Country Garden and Evergrande (the Chinese property behemoths) if they don't fix their problems post-haste.
  • Golden2husky The biggest hurdle for us would be the lack of a good charging network for road tripping as we are at the point in our lives that we will be traveling quite a bit. I'd rather pay more for longer range so the cheaper models would probably not make the cut. Improve the charging infrastructure and I'm certainly going to give one a try. This is more important that a lowish entry price IMHO.
  • Add Lightness I have nothing against paying more to get quality (think Toyota vs Chryco) but hate all the silly, non-mandated 'stuff' that automakers load onto cars based on what non-gearhead focus groups tell them they need to have in a car. I blame focus groups for automatic everything and double drivetrains (AWD) that really never gets used 98% of the time. The other 2% of the time, one goes looking for a place to need it to rationanalize the purchase.
Next