Ford to Wall Street: Drop Dead

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

At a Detroit Economic Club event held last night in the Motor City, Blue Oval Chairman Bill Ford opined that Ford Motor Co. may have been too forthcoming with Wall Street in past years.

“In the past, maybe we said too much,” Ford said Tuesday.

In a report from Bloomberg, Mr. Ford is quoted as saying the company with his name on the building is trying to provide clarity without tipping their hand in key competitive areas. “The key is providing clarity when we’re ready [emphasis mine] so that investors can make an informed decision.”

This brusque assessment of Wall Street comes on the heels of analysts downgrading their rating of Ford stock just days after new CEO Jim Hackett told investors it’ll take time to for him to turn around the company. According to Bloomberg, which tracks recommendations of certain analysts, five moneymakers suggest buying Ford shares, while nineteen rate them a hold. Two advise selling. Perhaps they were affected by the door latch recall.

Bill Ford went on to say, “This is a very competitive world we’re in. You want to give Wall Street enough information, but you also don’t want to telegraph exactly where you’re going. And I think that’s a balance that we are going to continue to work on.”

Alrighty then. Safe to say the Glass House won’t be sending any cards or brightly wrapped gifts to Wall Street this December.

This new tight-lipped policy is undoubtedly a response to the market’s persistent pessimism of Ford, despite the Blue Oval beating analysts’ earnings expectations every quarter so far this year. This is without mentioning the roughly $40 billion in cash Ford is reported to have lying around.

How has Wall Street rewarded Ford’s good performance? With a stock price mired in the $12 range, down 2.5 percent, year-to-date. Meanwhile, GM is up nearly 20 percent in the same timeframe. Tesla continues to mystify by reaching stratospheric stock market heights, despite its current inability to turn a profit making cars.

Sure, Ford could stand to do a few things in a speedier manner, such as bringing the Ranger and Bronco to market in order to tap hot segments. Ford is not exactly in turmoil, though, so Mr. Ford’s annoyance at Wall Street is largely justified, in this author’s opinion.

Investors seem to buy into the narratives they want to hear, and whatever they’re hearing right now about Ford, they don’t seem to like — despite Ford being profitable for ages and having enough resources to walk its own path. Perhaps Mr. Ford could take a page from Sgt Dignam in The Departed who, when asked about disclosure, opined, “Treat them like mushrooms. Feed ‘em shit and keep ‘em in the dark.”

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 43 comments
  • MrGreenMan MrGreenMan on Nov 01, 2017

    Take it private.

    • See 1 previous
    • Brn Brn on Nov 01, 2017

      Not a terrible idea. I've worked for privately owned companies, family owned companies, publically owned companies, and in the public sector. The worst was the family owned company (it's amazing what money and greed can do, when a small group is fighting over a couple billion dollars). Close to the bottom was the public company (way too focused on today's stock price). The best was the private company, as they focused on the long term. Public sector wasn't too bad either, as they focused on doing the right thing. Biggest problem in the public sector is trying to work with an excessive number of rules.

  • Its me Dave Its me Dave on Nov 01, 2017

    So I should spend my money on Ford stock so they can put it in the bank with the rest of the $40B in STA? I can do that all by myself. These car companies should go back to the strong emphasis on dividends, and let the market price adjust around that.

  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could be made in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next