Ace of Base: 2018 Subaru Forester 2.5i

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

At this year’s L.A. Auto Show, Subaru will introduce the Ascent, a seven-passenger crossover that the brand is calling the “biggest yet” and “family-sized.” In a market awash with three-row machines, Subaru is one of the few brands not peddling a vehicle that will seat a shift of hockey players plus their driver.

Until then, let’s toss one of Subaru’s current nameplates, the Forester, under our Ace of Base microscope.

Unless one pops for a 2.0XT model, priced in the thirties, all Forester wagons come with the same engine. A 2.5-liter boxer-four lives between the fenders, making 170 horsepower and rated at 28 mpg on the highway. All-wheel drive is standard, of course, as is a manual transmission.

Gone are the days when Legacy and Outback drivers could row-their-own all the way to their active-lifestyle destination, thanks to aggressive fuel economy regs and a CVT which reliably boosts fuel economy by nearly 14 percent in these vehicles. Fortunately, the Exploding Galaxy has not stripped the Forester of its manual box. This is a large reason why I chose the Forester for today’s Ace of Base and not one of its similarly-sized showroom cousins.

The 2.5i trim, at $22,795, rides on 17-inch steelies providing a not insignificant 8.7 inches of ground clearance. Eagle-eyed shoppers can spot this base model on dealer lots by looking for its black side mirrors and lack of rear spoiler. The 2.5i is also the only Forester not to include a moonroof, but take it from this 6’6” human: it eats into headroom. You don’t need it.

A six-way manually adjustable seat wrapped in cloth greets the driver, along with a sensible dashboard layout and logical analog gauges. Audio controls pepper the tilt/telescope steering wheel, controlling an infotainment system bearing a 6.2-inch screen and rear-facing camera.

Ever the practical one, all Foresters have grocery bag hooks and underfloor storage in the cargo area. A bevy of airbags keep things pillowy in a crash. Discs perform braking duties at all four corners along with the usual suite of traction control assists and dynamic vehicle controls that mete out or rein in power as needed in hair-raising road conditions.

No fewer than seven different paint options are on offer, ranging from the milquetoast grayscale to interesting green, red, and blue. This is pleasing to the discerning Ace of Base customer who desires choice in the hue of their next new car. Infuriatingly, the only way to get a black interior is to spec Crystal Black or Ice Silver exterior paint.

The brand as a whole has never been stronger, now selling triple the number of cars annually it was in 2002. In that year, they sold the Legacy, Impreza, WRX, Outback, and Forester. Today, showrooms are filled with those machines plus the BRZ and Crosstrek. Tripling one’s sales while only adding two models (one of those being low-volume) speaks to the inroads Subaru has made in the minds of American shoppers.

The Forester’s styling doesn’t speak to this author, as I’ve always found it too tall and narrow. That is, of course, strictly subjective. Given the level of standard equipment, and the continued presence of a manual transmission, a base model Forester holds a good bit of appeal for someone seeking a capacious all-wheel drive machine not priced into the stratosphere.

[Image: Subaru]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 65 comments
  • John Scott John Scott on Nov 25, 2017

    My 2017 Forester Premium 6MT has been a great car so far. 10K trouble-free miles, average 31MPG to date. I looked for this specific configuration - gets you heated seats, the nice looking alloy wheels, huge sunroof (my 6'3" son could wear anything short of a ten gallon hat so I don't know how you could want much more head room even with the sunroof) and the "traditional" style Subaru all wheel drive. Solid handling, good ride, plenty of room , yeah, more power would be a plus but there's plenty for the way I drive - with four adults aboard there's no worries keeping up with traffic on Ohio interstates. I have a strange amount of affection for my Forester though calling it "love" would be a stretch. So far it's been the most satisfying car for the money I've owned in nearly 40 years of automotive ownership. We'll see how it goes as the miles add up....

  • Turf3 Turf3 on Nov 27, 2017

    Well, we tried a '16 Forester and a '16 Outback, decided to buy the Outback because it's just a little cushier and more car-like, but we both really really liked the way the Forester drove. By the way, mixed driving returns well over 25 mpg and highway over 30 with the Outback which is mechanically identical to the Forester. The EPA mileage ratings are either the best in its class, or the second best. It has been many years since Subaru four wheel drive came with a big fuel mileage penalty. Current data seem to indicate that any reliability issues with earlier models have been addressed (only time will tell whether addressing them has completely eliminated them, or whether there are others). It is not a sports car or sports sedan, and if you drive it like one and expect it to respond like one, you are not using good sense. It is one of the three vehicles of this type you can see out of. The other two are the same year model Outback and the VW Tiguan. I really enjoyed driving the Tiguan but I am more afraid of buying a VW with their reliability record than a Subaru with their reliability record. I will resist buying a car I can't see out of as long as I can. Frankly I don't give a rat's behind what kind of "lesbian crunchy granola flannel wearer" image some people have decided to assign to Subaru. I am too old to care about that. I am male, so clearly not lesbian, I like granola, rarely wear flannel. Also know how to shoot, favorite dog is a poodle, know how to tie a necktie (three different ways), and carry a set of political beliefs that would curl your hair. I do not want to drive a school bus, thus the three row SUVs have zero appeal for me. Not interested in paying for size, weight, and poor fuel economy that I don't need.

  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
  • BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
  • Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?
Next