World's Biggest Rip-off of a Vehicle Gets a Facelift

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

You’ll never guess what Indian-owned, UK-based model this once looked like. Yes, the Landwind X7, arguably the closest automotive ripoff ever fielded by an automaker, no longer resembles its alleged muse.

The Chinese SUV, built as a joint venture between Changan Auto and Jiangling Motors Corporation, has received a mid-life refresh that erases some of the tell-tale cues of the model that inspired not only the vehicle, but its very name. Meanwhile, certain executives in Coventry, UK, are worried the Landwind X7 saga might happen again.

It was Roger Moore eyebrows all around at Jaguar Land Rover headquarters when the X7 debuted in 2015. The X7 wasn’t just inspired by the Range Rover Evoque — it was damn near a carbon copy of the compact SUV.

After all attempts to compel Jiangling Motor to pull the China-only vehicle from the market (and presumably start over with a clean-sheet design) failed, an infuriated JLR filed a lawsuit accusing the Chinese automaker of copyright infringement and unfair competition. It was an unprecedented move, as Chinese courts aren’t in the habit of favoring foreign automakers in such cases. (The Landwind facsimile is one of many copycat designs fielded in China.)

The case remains on the books, but as we can see in these official photos, the refreshed X7 no longer quite resembles the Evoque when viewed from the front or rear. It now sports a Ford Explorer-esque front fascia and taillights whose inspiration is anyone’s guess. Side-on, of course, the tell-tale silhouette remains.

The Landwind experience has left a lasting impression on JLR. Company brass no longer feels confident in releasing a new design in advance of a new model debut, fearing another automaker could copy it and bring it to market first. The iconic automaker has since filed new paperwork targeting Jiangling Motor.

Speaking at a new vehicle launch in mid-October, JLR design boss Gerry McGovern said the company is “wary of showing new concepts,” Auto Express reports.

“The success of Jaguar Land Rover is based partly on its unique design and engineering attributes, which we believe are worth protecting across all markets,” a company spokesperson told the publication.

Is the Landwind X7’s styling refresh the result of JLR’s litigation, or was the Chinese market just getting bored of the old design? Who knows. It’ll be interesting to see what the company does for a second generation X7.

[Images: Jiangling Motor]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 32 comments
  • Vanillasludge Vanillasludge on Nov 04, 2017

    No way they could match Land Rovers build quality however. These will probably be much better.

    • See 1 previous
    • JimZ JimZ on Nov 04, 2017

      @JohnTaurus that's like when Packard signed the contract to build Rolls-Royce Merlin fighter engines under license. They basically had to re-design the engine because they couldn't mass produce it with Rolls-Royce's hilariously loose tolerances.

  • IBx1 IBx1 on Nov 06, 2017

    You'd have to be legally blind to say the refresh looks nothing like the Evoque anymore. All they did was change the shape of the headlights to look like the Explorer and add a chrome squiggle from a current-model AMG in the grille.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next