Rare Rides: This Skoda 120 From 1985 is Red, Like the Communism That Built It

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis
Late last week, on our Rare Rides entry for the Renault Alliance GTA, commenter scott25 alerted me to a Skoda he spotted on Kijiji (which is what eBay is called in Canada or something). As most people in North America have likely never seen a Skoda, this odd little sedan should do nicely as today’s Rare Ride.Come along, comrades.
If this bright red Skoda looks a little archaic, that’s because it is. Strolling onto the world market back in 1976, the Skoda 120 (known as the Estelle in other markets) rode on the same platform as its predecessor, the 110, which debuted in 1969. Going against the natural grain for sedans, the 120 is rear-engined and rear-drive. Most are familiar with this sporting layout in the Porsche 911, though there are a few differences between this and the Porsche.Popular enough around the world to keep it going, the 120 soldiered on until the end of the Cold War — the last one rolled off the line in 1990. A welcome relief for Toyota, which had just introduced the Lexus LS400 that year. Imagine the sales fight which surely would have ensued.
The United States did receive one Skoda, the pretty little Felicia back in 1960, but U.S. customers quickly saw to its withdrawal. Unreliability and fuel frugality were of little interest at the time (oh, how things change). Canada however, had a more long-lasting relationship with the Skoda brand. Between 1982 and 1989, a company called SkoCar imported Skoda and various other Eastern Bloc brands into Canada. SkoCar catered to the interesting customer who rejected the fragile Accord for a rough and ready Czech sedan.
But don’t think all Skoda customers suffered in their Red Flag Rides, for our 120 today is the aspirational GLS trim. As you can see, this Skoda has an interior, and a glove box which aligns perfectly. For 1985, the GLS was the highest trim available in sedan guise.
A 1.1-liter inline-four provides the power here, and it sure looks refined. The five-speed manual was a new addition for the ’84 model year, and drivers could barely keep traction with 54 thundering Communist ponies in the trunk. There’s no photo of the side-hinged front trunk in the listing, but it’s huge.Canada gets salty sometimes, so the seller provided shots of the undercarriage — all appears clean and tidy. Located in suburban downtown Canada, the owner is asking $8,000, and I bet that’s pretty negotiable.[Images via seller]
Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 43 comments
  • Scott25 Scott25 on Oct 05, 2017

    I just wish it was slightly cheaper, but the price is understandable for how few (if any) others exist in this condition.

  • Skodaguy Skodaguy on Mar 06, 2018

    I have a 85 Rapid that i bought new in 85 and 3 85 120, must say they are great cars. Cars have spent all there lives in SK so are rust free, and all 4 still run strong even though no parts supply in Canada.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next