While Not Yet Official, Fuel Economy's on the Rise in the Ford Mustang Stable

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Those Ford Mustang owners. Obsessed with just one thing — a feverish, burning desire to consume as little gasoline as possible.

No, that can’t be right. Mustang buyers know what they want when purchasing the original pony car, and it usually involves the velocity of wind through one’s hair. Ford Motor Company, however, doesn’t have the luxury of such simple-mindedness. For a number of reasons, the largest of them being regulatory, the automaker requires its newest vehicles to burn less fuel than the previous generation.

The 2018 Mustang is no different. For the coming model year, the massaged and freshened Mustang promises owners less time spent at the gas pump.

While Ford’s just-released fuel economy figures aren’t yet confirmed by the Environmental Protection Agency, but estimates aren’t likely to stray far from the mark, if at all.

For 2018, both four-cylinder EcoBoost models and traditional V8 powertrains receive Ford’s 10-speed automatic, instantly upping the number of gears by 40 percent. Further economy enhancements come in the form of aero improvements. Active grille shutters, a smoother underside, and a controversial squishing of the model’s face all conspire to boost the ‘Stang’s slipperiness.

What does that mean for fuel economy? Compared to last year’s model, a 2018 EcoBoost model with six-speed manual is estimated at 21 mpg in the city, 31 on the highway, and 25 mpg combined. That’s a 1 mpg improvement for the highway and combined ratings.

Springing for the 10-speed brings about larger gains. So equipped, the EcoBoost now boasts a 32 mpg highway figure, 21 mpg in the city, and 25 mpg combined. That’s a 2 mpg increase on the highway, and a 1 mpg overall gain.

The 3.7-liter V6 doesn’t apply in this comparison, as the former base engine disappears from the model in 2018. The 5.0-liter V8, with a manual tranny, returns an estimated 15 mpg city, 25 mpg highway, and 18 mpg combined. In other words, the absolutely no change for stick-shift V8s. Adding four more cogs to the Mustang GT’s automatic does bring about a change, however, and it’s the largest of the lineup. City, highway, and combined fuel economy all rise by 1 mpg in the automatic-equipped V8 model, for an estimated rating of 16/25/19.

We’ll have confirmation of the gains once the EPA gets around to posting official numbers on fuel economy.gov.

As for the hottest Mustang variants, don’t expect anything new for 2018. The GT350 and GT350R soldier on unchanged in output, economy, and appearance. With the elimination of the base V6 engine, the Mustang’s entry prices rises, but not by a lot. Getting into a lesser ‘Stang now means paying more for a V8, and less for a four-cylinder.

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 40 comments
  • TMA1 TMA1 on Oct 12, 2017

    Might as well share my mileage numbers, since I just drove from Ohio to DC in a '16 GT with the old 6-speed auto. For the first 50 miles of the trip, on the flat NE Ohio turnipike, I was at 29.1 mpg, driving about 75. Flooring it to get around some moron while leaving the tool booth instantly dropped me to 28.4. After 264 miles, into hilly PA, I was at 27.7 mpg. Average speed of 68 mph. Not sure how I was driving so slow, since I was touching 80 at times, but that's what I calculated from my trip computer. Ran into road construction with stopped traffic at 321 miles. Down to 27.4 mpg by the time I started again. Another bout of construction stalling had me down to 27.1 by the time I got off the interstate. Just my experience, numbers are based off the trip computer. Not bad for a heavy car with 430 hp. My '09 Mazda3 hatch didn't do any better on that trip.

  • Tele Vision Tele Vision on Oct 12, 2017

    My '07 V gets some kinda mileage, I'm sure, but I don't really give a care what it is. It's in a fine state of tune with good tires, which is about all I can do for a 10-year-old sports sedan with the aerodynamics of a house. It pulls hard when prodded and happily lopes along when not. I'm pretty sure I spend more money on coffee per day than gasoline. Job done.

  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could be made in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next