Mazda Drops Duo of Sexy Concepts; One Hints At the Next 3

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Mazda is no stranger to creating knockout concepts – witness the Kabura in 2006 and the Shinari a few years later. At this year’s Tokyo Motor Show, though, the Hiroshima designers have outdone themselves with the stunningly beautiful Vision Coupe and Kai concept cars.

Following up on the RX-Vision concept of a couple years ago, the Vision is – despite its coupe moniker – a rakish four-door. Mazda’s KODO design language is in full effect, with deep side scallops and a windshield-to-grille measurement seemingly longer than the entire island of Japan. Despite having four doors, classic coupe proportions are obvious.

Mazda calls the design of the Vision Coupe a mature expression of the KODO language, one which may signal a shift upmarket for some of its products with elegant and premium styling. It is common industry knowledge that Mazda longs to increase its bottom end through a higher average transaction price of its vehicles, rather than more volume. A car like the Vision Coupe would be a big step in that direction.

The interior of the Vision Concept is equally striking and not entirely made of vaporware and moonbeams. A trio of gauges sit ahead of the driver, with an elegant-looking tachometer flanked by two smaller dials, possibly reconfigurable screens. Mazda says this model features a “see-through” screen for driver information, functioning as a display only at those times when it is required, and creating an interior space with great visibility. Okay, then.

A bit more grounded in reality is the Kai concept, which stands an excellent chance of pointing the direction towards the next Mazda 3. Featuring all of Mazda’s next-gen Skyactiv technology, the Kai Concept is Hiroshima’s littlest hatch cranked up to eleven.

This author truly believes the current Mazda 3 is one of the best looking small cars on the market. If the next 3 looks anything like the Kai, the compact end of Mazda’s portfolio will become even more attractive.

As with the Vision Coupe, the Kai evolves Mazda’s KODO design language, smoothing out some of the current 3’s creases in favor of sweeping body panels, an aggressively forward-canted grille, and very narrow headlights. The Kai’s interior looks largely production-ready as well, featuring Mazda hallmarks like a tachometer placed dead-ahead of the driver and a natty three-spoke steering wheel.

Some details will surely be toned down for production once the pencil-necked accounting department gets ahold of the it, but the compact five-door Kai is an excellent starting point for the next 3. As part of Mazda’s “Sustainable Zoom-Zoom 2030” mandate (yes, that’s its real name), we could see a new 3 on North American roads in the latter half of next year as a 2019 model.

The Tokyo Motor Show runs until November 5th.

[Images: Mazda]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 55 comments
  • Vulpine Vulpine on Oct 26, 2017

    I'm not the greatest fan of Mazda's cars, though I don't deny they're pretty good. However, by hiding the back doors to make these at least look like 2-door coupes they begin to grab my interest. Now if they can only bring these out to the general public.

  • David C. Holzman David C. Holzman on Oct 26, 2017

    I like 'em, but I hope they make the windows big enough to see out of.

  • 3-On-The-Tree I have a 2009 C6 Corvette LS3 and the only major repair that I have done on it was replace the radiator. Besides usual plugs, wires oil etc. And yes those tires are expensive as well.
  • 28-Cars-Later We had a red 2003 with less than 100 miles in late 2004/5ish and kept it till the end AFAIK. I do recall being told we had about $28,000 in at the time (about $43,6 in 2023 Clown World Bux). I don't ever recall anyone retail even looking at it, and it lived in the showroom/garage."It's an automatic that just had the linkage repaired and upgraded"This really doesn't bode well. Maybe there's a upgrade I'm simply not aware of so one could tune the 3rd Gen LM4 for higher power but messing with it isn't making me smile because now I know its no longer factory or somehow it broke and with such low miles I'm equally concerned.
  • Analoggrotto With Kia Hyundai you are guaranteed to have the best Maintenance and Service experience in the industry. Complementary diagnostics, open book fees schedules and adherence to published rates with no attempts to tack extra work on are part of the HMC Gold Standard of Service. Recalls are the lowest in the industry but when you bring your Hyundai Genesis Kia vehicle in for Feature Improvement, rest assured that it will be taken care of to the highest pentagon standards, fully free of charge with no pressure for paid work or service unless requested. Hyundai Kia have the highest levels of customer ATP loyalty in the industry and Service is key to the best after sales experience.
  • MaintenanceCosts In Toyota's hands, these hybrid powertrains with a single motor and a conventional automatic transmission have not been achieving the same kind of fuel economy benefits as the planetary-gear setups in the smaller cars. It's too bad. Many years ago GM did a group of full-size pickups and SUVs with a 6.0L V8 and a two-motor planetary gear system, and those got the fuel economy boost you'd expect while maintaining big-time towing capacity. Toyota should have done the same with its turbo four and six in the new trucks.
  • JMII My C7 isn't too bad maintain wise but it requires 10 quarts of expensive 0W-40 once a year (per GM) and tires are pricey due size and grip requirements. I average about $600 a year in maintenance but a majority of that is due to track usage. Brake fluid, brake pads and tires add up quickly. Wiper blades, coolant flush, transmission fluid, rear diff fluid and a new battery were the other costs. I bought the car in 2018 with 18k in mileage and now it has 42k. Many of the items mentioned are needed between 20k and 40k per GM's service schedule so my ownership period just happens to align with various intervals.I really need to go thru my service spreadsheet and put track related items on a separate tab to get a better picture of what "normal" cost would be. Its likely 75% of my spend is track related.Repairs to date are only $350. I needed a new XM antenna (aftermarket), a cargo net clip, a backup lamp switch and new LED side markers (aftermarket). The LEDs were the most expensive at $220.
Next