Junkyard Find: 1968 Chevrolet Nova Sedan

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

There was a time, from the late 1960s through the late 1980s, when the third-generation Chevrolet Nova was among the most plentiful Chevrolets found on North American roads. These cars were cheap, sturdy, and fuel efficient for their time, but discarded ones are so rare now that this is the first one I have seen in a self-service wrecking yard since this ’73 hatchback in 2011.

1968 was the first model year for this generation of Nova, which shares much of its chassis design with the 1967-1969 Camaro/Firebird. The Chevy II name was still used in 1968 (Nova was the name used for a higher trim level of the 1962-1968 Chevy II); all these cars became just plain Novas for 1969.

This one is a bench seat car with three-on-the-tree manual transmission, six-cylinder engine, and four doors. While many of these cars survive today, just about all of them are V8-powered two-doors.

Even a rusty two-door late-1960s Nova would be snapped up long before it arrived at this sort of junkyard, as old-school drag racers and muscle car fanciers worship the lightweight Nova (into which just about any GM V8 engine may be bolted or near-bolted).

Most of these cars came from the factory with the straight-six engine, as this one did, though the seldom-purchased Super-Thrift 153-cubic-inch inline-four engine was available until 1970. Production figures show 146,300 1968 Novas built with the 250-cubic-inch I6 engine and 53,400 with a V8 engine (either a boat anchor 307 or the much rarer 327).

You’d think someone would want a good old Saginaw three-speed manual transmission for $99.99, but I suppose there’s a glut of these things in garages around the country.

According to the cowl tag, this Grotto Blue Chevy II was built at the Willow Run Assembly plant in Michigan during the fifth week of January, 1968. That means this car rolled off the assembly line within a day or two of the start of the Tet Offensive in Vietnam.

An uncomplicated economical car becomes a beautiful expensive-looking car.





Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 38 comments
  • Ben T Spanner Ben T Spanner on Oct 09, 2017

    I got back from Nam in 1970 and my first employer had a fleet of 1968 and 1969 Chevy Biscaynes in various greys. The only options were powerglide and AM radios. I always thought that Novas would have been much better. but Novas didn't fit the corporate image of a full size car.

  • Synchromesh Synchromesh on Oct 12, 2017

    It started out Grotto Blue and finished Ghetto Blue. How very logical.

  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could be made in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next